journal article·2019-10Open access

Predicting failure load of a non-crimp fabric composite by means of a 3D finite element model including progressive damage

Luis Miguel Ferreira, Enrique Graciani, Federico París

Abstract

A mesoscopic scale 3D finite element model of its representative unit cell is used to study the progressive damage of a [0,90]n non-crimp fabric laminate under compressive loading. The tows of the unit cell have been generated with a straight finite element mesh, and the out-of-plane fibre crimp has been incorporated into the model by defining the mechanical properties of each element according to the actual direction of the fibres. The material properties degradation (MPDG) method has been used to study the damage evolution. Non-interactive criteria (Maximum Stress and Maximum Strain), and interactive criteria (Hashin and Puck), associated with failure modes, have been employed to determine the onset of the material degradation at the fibre tows. The progressive damage throughout the mesoscopic unit cell, from the load at which damage is initiated, until the load at which the failure of the laminate is predicted, has been analysed. The mechanism responsible for the failure of the laminate has also been identified. The numerical predictions of the failure stress and failure strain, for the considered failure criteria, are discussed and compared with experimental data obtained from direct compression tests on biaxial cross-ply NCF laminates. A satisfactory agreement between the numerical and experimental failure stress, failure strain as well as the compressive stress-strain curves has been obtained for the MPDG method when using Maximum Stress, Hashin’s or Puck’s failure criteria.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Methodology for characterization of internal structure parameters governing performance in NCF composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.04.004 ↗
2. Finite-element investigation of the compressive strength of non-crimp-fabric-based composites10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00165-1 ↗
3. Improving the delamination resistance of CFRP by stitching—a review10.1016/0266-3538(94)90019-1 ↗
4. Miller · 1996
5. A finite-element investigation of the interlaminar shear behaviour of non-crimp-fabric-based composites10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00091-3 ↗
6. Prediction of in-plane stiffness properties of non-crimp fabric laminates by means of 3D finite element analysis10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.026 ↗
7. Marklund E, Asp LE. Multiscale methodology for matrix failure prediction in non-crimp fabric composites. 14th European Conference on Composite Materials. Budapest, Hungary; 2010.
8. Damage in NCF composites under tension: effect of layer stacking sequence10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.014 ↗
9. Average strain in fiber bundles and its effect on NCF composite stiffness10.1115/1.2400266 ↗
10. Meso-FE modelling of textile composites: road map, data flow and algorithms10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.017 ↗
11. Lomov SV, Verpoest I. Modelling of the internal structure and deformability of textile reinforcements: WiseTex software. Composites for the Future, 10th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM-10). Brugge, Belgium; 2002.
12. Estimation of the mechanical behaviors for textile composites based on multi-scale analysis
13. Kurashiki T, Watanabe Y, Matsushima Y, Zako M, Lomov S, Verpoest I. Effects of stitching parameters on damage development for non-crimp fabric composites under tensile loading. ECCM15 – 15th European Conference on Composite Materials. Venice, Italy; 2012.
14. Meso-scale modelling of 3D woven composite T-joints with weave variations10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.024 ↗
15. Geometric modelling of industrial preforms: woven and braided textiles
16. Geometric modelling of industrial preforms: warp-knitted textiles
17. Late-stage fatigue damage in a 3D orthogonal non-crimp woven composite: an experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.020 ↗
18. Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00074-8 ↗
19. A further assessment of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: comparison with experimental evidence10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00227-6 ↗
20. Time of the rupture process under creep conditions
21. Lemaitre · 1992
22. Lemaitre · 1990
23. Continuous damage mechanics — a tool to describe phenomena before crack initiation10.1016/0029-5493(81)90007-8 ↗
24. A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites10.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-0 ↗
25. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
26. A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part I – constitutive model10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.005 ↗
27. A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part II – Computational implementation and validation10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.006 ↗
28. A constitutive model for elastic damage in fiber-reinforced PMC laminae10.1106/6PQ6-31JW-F69K-74LU ↗
29. An anisotropic damage model for the description of transverse matrix cracking in a graphite–epoxy laminate10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00013-7 ↗
30. Progressive failure analysis of carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates using continuum damage mechanics10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.023 ↗
31. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
32. Experimental and numerical investigation of progressive damage in composite laminates based on continuum damage mechanics10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.08.013 ↗
33. Progressive damage analysis and testing of composite laminates with fiber waves10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.005 ↗
34. Determination of material properties for ANSYS progressive damage analysis of laminated composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.074 ↗
35. A three-dimensional progressive damage FE model for GFRP composites under monotonic loading10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.008 ↗
36. ANSYS. 18 ed.; 2018.
37. Modelling the waviness of the fibres in non-crimp fabric composites using 3D finite element models with straight tows10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.038 ↗
38. Three dimensional finite element study of the behaviour and failure mechanism of non-crimp fabric composites under in-plane compression10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.022 ↗
39. Ferreira LM, Graciani E, París F. Progressive damage study of NCF composites under compressive loading. ECCM16 – 16th European Conference on Composite Materials. Seville, Spain; 2014. p. 56.
40. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-1 ↗
41. Sinclar · 2005
42. Chamis · 1984 · 41
43. Mechanical modelling of 3D woven composites considering realistic unit cell geometry10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.005 ↗
44. A progressive damage model of textile composites on meso-scale using finite element method: static damage analysis10.1177/0021998313507008 ↗
45. HEXCEL. HexPly M36 Product data sheet; 2019.
46. TohoTenax America Inc HTS40 data sheet; 2008.
47. Mattsson D, Joffe R, Varna J. Characterisation of processability and manufacturing. Characterisation of microstructure. FALCOM/WP2:D2.1-4/LTU; 2004.
48. Longitudinal Shear Modulus of Single Aramid, Carbon and Glass Fibres by Torsion Pendulum Tests. Int J Mech, Aerospace Ind, Mechatron Manuf Eng. 2014;8:422–8.
49. Shear moduli of carbon, Si-C-O, Si-C-Ti-O and alumina single ceramic fibers as assessed by torsion pendulum tests10.1016/0266-3538(93)90059-P ↗
50. Transverse properties of carbon fibres by nano-indentation and micro-mechanics10.1007/s10443-008-9057-3 ↗
51. Comparison of experimental and theoretical transverse elastic modulus of carbon fibers10.1016/j.carbon.2006.01.026 ↗
52. Herakovich · 1997
53. Asp LE, Öhgren I, Holmberg JA. Determination of fibre content on RFI plates for G1c and OHT testing. FALCOM/WP3/SI/TECH001; 2004.
54. Lubin · 1998
55. Creemers · 2010
56. Sun · 1996 · 132
57. Ferreira · 2012
58. Compressive failure analysis of non-crimp fabric composites with large out-of-plane misalignment of fiber bundles10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.028 ↗
59. Guidelines for the determination of the parameters in Puck’s action plane strength criterion10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00202-0 ↗