Dimensionality and size effects on the strength of fiber-reinforced composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The tensile failure of fiber-reinforced composites in 2D (l-ply) and thin multi-ply samples has been studied numerically in order to assess the role of dimensionality on the absolute magnitude, reliability, and size scaling of composite strength. Single-ply tapes, often used in model calculations because of the simplifications attending the reduced dimensionality, and 2-ply tapes are shown to have (i) lower strengths than 4-ply specimens, with the latter approaching 'bulk' response, and (ii) broader failure probability distributions than 4-ply samples. These two effects together indicate that using a 1-ply or 2-ply geometry to investigate composite strength size effects and reliability, or to compare against real composites, is not quantitatively accurate. Calculations are also performed on the same systems but with fiber 'pull-out' loads, i.e. the residual load carrying capability of broken fibers in the composite, essentially eliminated. Such a model approximates the 'chain of bundles' models widely developed for prediction of composite failure. In the absence of fiber pull-out, the composite strength is much lower and again more broadly distributed. Overall, the present results suggest that simplified analytic and computational models based on a 2D tape geometry and/or neglecting fiber 'pull-out' must be viewed with caution in applications to real composite systems. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Daniels · Proc. Roy. Soc. A · 1945 · 183 · 40510.1098/rspa.1945.0011 ↗
2. Coleman · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1958 · 7 · 6010.1016/0022-5096(58)90039-5 ↗
3. Gucer · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1962 · 10 · 36510.1016/0022-5096(62)90007-8 ↗
4. Rosen · AIAA J. · 1964 · 2 · 198510.2514/3.2699 ↗
5. Zweben · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1970 · 18 · 18910.1016/0022-5096(70)90023-2 ↗
6. Scop · J. Comp. Mater. · 1969 · 3 · 3010.1177/002199836900300103 ↗
7. Harlow · Int. J. Fract. · 1981 · 17 · 60110.1007/BF00681559 ↗
8. Smith · Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A · 1983 · 388 · 35310.1098/rspa.1983.0087 ↗
9. Batdorf · Int. J. Fract. · 1984 · 26 · 11310.1007/BF01157548 ↗
10. Fukuda · J. Comp. Mater. · 1981 · 15 · 7910.1177/002199838101500107 ↗
11. Duxbury · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 280510.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2805 ↗
12. Durham · J. Comp. Mater. · 1997 · 31 · 185610.1177/002199839703101805 ↗
13. Majumdar BS. TMS Annual Mtg., Chicago (IL), 1998; Majumdar BS, Matikas TE, Miracle DB. Composites B 1998;29B:131–145.10.1016/S1359-8368(97)00004-8 ↗
14. Zhou · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1995 · 43 · 309310.1016/0956-7151(95)00003-E ↗
15. Ibnabdeljalil M, Curtin WA. Int J Solids Struct 1997;34:2649.10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00179-5 ↗
16. Curtin · Adv. Appl. Mech. · 1999 · 36 · 16310.1016/S0065-2156(08)70186-8 ↗
17. Hedgepth JM. NASA TN D-882, NASA report, USA, 1961.
18. Hedgepeth · J. Comp. Mater. · 1967 · 1 · 29410.1177/002199836700100305 ↗
19. Foster GC, Ibnabdeljalil M, Curtin WA. Int J Solids Struct 1998;35:2523.10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00148-0 ↗
20. Ramamurty · Acta Mater. · 1997 · 45 · 460310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00133-X ↗
21. Curtin · J. Comp. Mater. · 1998 · 32 · 206010.1177/002199839803202204 ↗
22. Curtin WA. J Comp Mater, submitted for publication.
23. Sastry · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1993 · 12 · 159610.1007/BF00627024 ↗
24. Beyerlein · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1996 · 44 · 199710.1016/S0022-5096(96)00068-3 ↗
25. Curtin · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1991 · 74 · 283710.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x ↗
26. Foster G. MS thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & SU, Blacksburg (VA), 1998.
27. Phoenix · Acta Metall. · 1992 · 40 · 281310.1016/0956-7151(92)90447-M ↗
28. Smith · J. Appl. Mech. · 1981 · 103 · 7510.1115/1.3157595 ↗
29. Phoenix · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 1997 · 34 · 54510.1016/S0020-7683(96)00034-0 ↗
30. Pitt · Int. J. Fract · 1983 · 22 · 24310.1007/BF01140156 ↗
31. Wagner · J. Mater. Sci. · 1997 · 31 · 116510.1007/BF00353095 ↗
32. Amer · Comp. Sci. Technol. · 1997 · 57 · 112910.1016/S0266-3538(96)00181-9 ↗
33. Beyerlein · Sci. Eng. Comp. Mater. · 1998 · 7 · 15110.1515/SECM.1998.7.1-2.151 ↗
34. He · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1999 · 47 · 46510.1016/S0022-5096(98)00053-2 ↗
35. Beyerlein · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1997 · 57 · 24110.1016/S0013-7944(97)00012-X ↗
36. Beyerlein · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1997 · 57 · 26710.1016/S0013-7944(97)00013-1 ↗
37. Curtin · Acta Metall. · 1991 · 38 · 205110.1016/0956-7151(90)90072-O ↗
38. Curtin · Phys. Rev. B. · 1997 · 55 · 1127010.1103/PhysRevB.55.11270 ↗
39. Marshall · Acta Metall. · 1987 · 35 · 2013
40. O'Connell · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1994 · 42 · 45110.1016/0956-7151(94)90478-2 ↗
41. Ibnabdejalil · Acta Mater. · 1998 · 45 · 364110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00056-6 ↗