journal article·2018Open access

Graphene/TiO2-Ag Based Composites Used as Sensitive Electrode Materials for Amaranth Electrochemical Detection and Degradation

Florina Pogacean, Marcela-Corina Rosu, Maria Coros, Lidia Magerusan, Marioara Moldovan, Codruta Sarosi, Alin-Sebastian Porav, Raluca-Ioana Stefan-van Staden, Stela Pruneanu

Abstract

Graphene/TiO 2 -Ag based composites having various quantities of TiO 2 -Ag nanoparticles (5, 10 or 15 wt%) were successfully prepared through a facile chemical-thermal route. The morphological and structural characteristics of the synthesized materials denoted GTA-5, GTA-10 and GTA-15 were investigated by TEM, XRD and FTIR techniques. The composites were used for the modification of three gold electrodes (Au/GTA-5, Au/GTA-10, Au/GTA-15) which were next employed in the electrochemical detection and degradation of amaranth (an azo dye model). The electrode with the best performance in terms of sensitivity was the Au/GTA-10 electrode. It had considerably larger sensitivity (24 mA/M), in comparison with that of Au/GTA-5 and Au/GTA-15 electrode (8 mA/M and 12 mA/M, respectively). The limit of detection was the same for all modified electrodes (LOD = 1 × 10 −7 M; S/N = 3). The Au/GTA-10 electrode was also tested at the electrochemical degradation of amaranth, from aqueous solutions. The degradation reaction followed a first order kinetics with a half-time of degradation of 203 minutes. The response characteristics of the proposed sensor made it a good candidate for integration in the Ubiquitous sensor's network for IOT.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dye analysis and toxicity · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1139/a11-01810.1139/a11-018 ↗
2. 10.19080/CTBEB.2017.03.55561810.19080/CTBEB.2017.03.555618 ↗
3. Chequer F. M. Drumond Dorta D. Junqueira de Oliveira D. Palma , “Azo dyes and their metabolites: Does the discharge of the azo dye into water bodies represent human and ecological risks?”, Advances in Treating Textile Effluent, Prof. Hauser Peter (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-704-8, InTech (2011).
4. Azo dyes – biological activity and synthetic strategy
5. The azo derivatives of salicylic acid
6. Azo dyes: Characterization and toxicity–a Review
7. 10.1108/EUM000000000599210.1108/EUM0000000005992 ↗
8. Toxicity assessment and microbial degradation of azo dyes
9. 10.1016/S1383-5742(02)00008-X10.1016/S1383-5742(02)00008-X ↗
10. 10.1093/carcin/bgp26710.1093/carcin/bgp267 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.09.00310.1016/j.jfda.2014.09.003 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.09.01510.1016/j.talanta.2007.09.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.01.00710.1016/j.dyepig.2013.01.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.07110.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.071 ↗
15. 10.1002/elps.20070020810.1002/elps.200700208 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jksus.2015.05.00910.1016/j.jksus.2015.05.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.03.03510.1016/j.talanta.2017.03.035 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1872-2040(13)60650-710.1016/S1872-2040(13)60650-7 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12161-017-0889-z10.1007/s12161-017-0889-z ↗
20. Ahmed M. U. Zourob M. Tamiya E. , “Food Chemistry, Function and Analysis”, Food Biosensors, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge (2017).10.1039/9781782623908 ↗
21. 10.1155/2013/76395310.1155/2013/763953 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.06.00110.1016/j.mattod.2014.06.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jes.2014.09.02310.1016/j.jes.2014.09.023 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2016.07.00210.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2016.07.002 ↗
25. 10.3390/s12020165710.3390/s120201657 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.12.01310.1016/j.snb.2014.12.013 ↗
27. 10.1371/journal.pone.016275510.1371/journal.pone.0162755 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10854-017-6685-010.1007/s10854-017-6685-0 ↗
29. 10.2147/IJN.S2818910.2147/IJN.S28189 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.11410.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.114 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.02.04110.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.02.041 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bios.2012.05.03310.1016/j.bios.2012.05.033 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.08410.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.084 ↗
34. 10.1039/c3ra48065h10.1039/c3ra48065h ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.07810.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.078 ↗
36. 10.1080/02786826.2015.105008610.1080/02786826.2015.1050086 ↗
37. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa6e5d10.1088/1361-6528/aa6e5d ↗
38. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.12410.1016/j.snb.2015.02.124 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.00310.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.003 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp205261810.1021/jp2052618 ↗
41. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-46510.1186/1556-276X-8-465 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.07810.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.078 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.14310.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.143 ↗
44. 10.3390/s1711266510.3390/s17112665 ↗
45. 10.1007/s12161-013-9676-710.1007/s12161-013-9676-7 ↗
46. 10.1039/C7PP00090A10.1039/C7PP00090A ↗
47. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.08510.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.085 ↗
48. Amaranth food dye photochemical and photoelectrochemical degradation: Experiments and mathematical modeling
49. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.07.14110.1016/j.electacta.2014.07.141 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2009.04.01010.1016/j.jelechem.2009.04.010 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.06310.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.063 ↗
52. 10.4236/jep.2013.4101610.4236/jep.2013.41016 ↗