journal article·2024-06-03Open access

Low pH Titanium Electrochemistry in the Presence of Sulfuric Acid and its Implications for Redox Flow Battery Applications

Sheikh Imran Uddin Ahmed, Shrihari Sankarasubramanian

Abstract

Titanium (Ti) is a promising elemental redox active species for redox flow batteries (RFBs) due to its 100x availability in the Earth crust, and 10x lower cost (compared to elemental vanadium). Furthermore, Ti salts are highly soluble in water and concentrations >5 M can be easily obtained. Seeking to harness the higher solubility (and hence energy density) of the Ti electrolyte for flow battery applications, the Ti4+/Ti3+ redox couple was investigated at high concentrations (up to 5 M) relevant to RFB applications. The behavior of Ti ions in H2SO4 supported electrolytes was investigated by varying the ratio of Ti redox active species to counterion. The electrochemical characteristics, transport properties, and redox kinetics of the Ti4+/Ti3+ redox couple were measured and the impact of the Tix+ to solvating ligand ratio was examined. The coordination structures around solvated Tix+ ions were spectroscopically determined and the effect of solvation structure on the Ti3+/Ti4+ redox rate constants were examined and correlated to the calculated solvation energy (hence distinguishing between inner- and outer-sphere processes) and the role of catalysts was addressed. The Ti electrolyte development guidelines presented herein will advance the development of Ti-based RFBs as a promising pathway towards cost effective, grid-scale energy storage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Valentine · 2011
2. Thaller · 1976
3. Ahmed · Front. Energy Res. · 2022 · 10 · 110.3389/fenrg.2022.1021201 ↗
4. Dong · SEI Tech. Rev. · 2017 · 84 · 35
5. Dong · ECS Trans. · 2015 · 69 · 5910.1149/06918.0059ecst ↗
6. Kaku · ECS Trans. · 2016 · 72 · 110.1149/07210.0001ecst ↗
7. Kaku · ECS Trans. · 2017 · 77 · 17310.1149/07711.0173ecst ↗
8. Kaku · ECS Meet. Abstr. · 2019 · MA2019-01 · 40110.1149/MA2019-01/3/401 ↗
9. Savinell · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1979 · 126 · 35710.1149/1.2129043 ↗
10. Liu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1982 · 129 · 250210.1149/1.2123592 ↗
11. U. S. Geological-Survey · 2021
12. U. S. Geological-Survey · 2021
13. Cservenyák · Electrochim. Acta · 1996 · 41 · 56310.1016/0013-4686(95)00343-6 ↗
14. Bahdad · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2021 · 16810.1149/1945-7111/ac0e4e ↗
15. Miyanaga · Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 1990 · 63 · 328210.1246/bcsj.63.3282 ↗
16. Choe · AIP Adv. · 2021 · 1110.1063/5.0038061 ↗
17. Tsurumura · J. Mol. Liq. · 2020 · 30510.1016/j.molliq.2020.112867 ↗
18. Sole · Hydrometallurgy · 1999 · 51 · 23910.1016/S0304-386X(98)00081-4 ↗
19. Cservenyák · Electrochim. Acta · 1996 · 41 · 57310.1016/0013-4686(95)00344-4 ↗
20. Lingane · Anal. Chim. Acta · 1956 · 15 · 29410.1016/0003-2670(56)80053-6 ↗
21. Kavan · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 1993 · 346 · 29110.1016/0022-0728(93)85020-H ↗
22. Habashy · Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. · 1960 · 306 · 31210.1002/zaac.19603060511 ↗
23. Kotsyubynsky · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2017 · 12 · 36910.1186/s11671-017-2144-3 ↗
24. Tsurumura · J. Mol. Liq. · 2018 · 261 · 46810.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.074 ↗
25. Choe · AIP Adv. · 2021 · 1110.1063/5.0038061 ↗
26. Kadyrova · Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. · 1983 · 28 · 1075
27. Pourbaix · 1966
28. Premović · Can. J. Chem. · 1974 · 52 · 291910.1139/v74-425 ↗
29. Kelsall · 1994 · 129
30. Szilágyi · Inorg. Chem. · 2009 · 48 · 220010.1021/ic801722r ↗
31. Baillon · J. Mol. Liq. · 2008 · 143 · 810.1016/j.molliq.2008.04.010 ↗
32. Skocaj · Radiat. Oncol. J. · 2011 · 45 · 227
33. Chen · Small · 2013 · 9 · 176510.1002/smll.201201506 ↗
34. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1996 · 213 · 13410.1016/0921-5093(96)10243-4 ↗
35. Gultepe · Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. · 2010 · 62 · 30510.1016/j.addr.2009.11.003 ↗
36. Ziental · Nanomater. (Basel) · 2020 · 10 · 38710.3390/nano10020387 ↗
37. Wang · Int J Nanomedicine · 2016 · 11 · 481910.2147/IJN.S108847 ↗
38. Qiao · Chem. Eng. J. · 2022 · 43410.1016/j.cej.2022.134588 ↗
39. Fatouros · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2004 · 568 · 5510.1016/j.jelechem.2004.01.006 ↗
40. Kiekens · Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. · 1981 · 90 · 35110.1002/bscb.19810900411 ↗
41. Piotrowski · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 145 · 236210.1149/1.1838644 ↗
42. Sum · J. Power Sources · 1985 · 16 · 8510.1016/0378-7753(85)80082-3 ↗
43. Sharma · Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. · 2021 · 11810.1073/pnas.2105889118 ↗
44. Sankarasubramanian · Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. · 2019 · 116 · 1489910.1073/pnas.1901329116 ↗
45. Beukenkamp · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1960 · 82 · 302510.1021/ja01497a014 ↗
46. Carey · 1996
47. Herranz · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 1908410.1021/jp304277z ↗
48. Beck · Electrochim. Acta · 1973 · 18 · 80710.1016/0013-4686(73)85032-7 ↗
49. Fletcher · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2009 · 13 · 53710.1007/s10008-008-0670-8 ↗
50. Fang · ACS Catal. · 2014 · 4 · 436410.1021/cs501312v ↗
51. Goroshchenko · Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. · 1961 · 6 · 744
52. Fuller · 2018
53. Li · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 637010.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11874 ↗
54. Duarte Ramos Matos · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 2017 · 62 · 155910.1021/acs.jced.7b00104 ↗
55. Ward · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2021 · 125 · 599010.1021/acs.jpca.1c01960 ↗
56. Rensonnet · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2024 · 26 · 293610.1039/D3CP04741E ↗