Influence of Hydrogen Electrode Active Layer Thickness on Electrochemical Performance of Solid Oxide Cell Operating in Electrolysis Mode
Source abstract
Abstract
Reversible solid oxide cell technology (RSOC) is a key technology in future hydrogen energy concept and may play a significant role in stabilizing intermittent renewable electric power sources. This work handles an attempt to optimize the thickness of the hydrogen electrode active layer (HEAL) for solid oxide cells designed and developed initially for fuel cell application (SOFC). Five cells with HEAL thickness of 0, 7, 12, 16 and 20 μm, prepared using industrial manufacturing methods, are analyzed using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) methods under a wide range of operating conditions. Optimal thickness of an active layer studied depends on operating conditions. Depending on the temperature and feed gas water content applied highest performances were achieved for cells with HEAL thicknesses between 7 and 16 μm. At 800 °C and 90% feed gas water content, the best cell had an active layer of 7 μm, drawing −3.5 A cm−2 current at −1.4 V.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Arkenberg · ECS Trans. · 2017 · 78 · 180510.1149/07801.1805ecst ↗
2. Lang · Fuel Cells · 2020 · 20 · 69010.1002/fuce.201900245 ↗
3. Commercialization of energy storage in Europe: Final report
4. Mogensen · Clean Energy · 2019 · 3 · 17510.1093/ce/zkz023 ↗
5. Vialetto · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2019 · 44 · 960810.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.145 ↗
6. Mocoteguy · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2013 · 38 · 1588710.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.045 ↗
7. Tao · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 328 · 45210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.055 ↗
8. Kukk · Energies · 2021 · 14 · 82410.3390/en14040824 ↗
9. Chen · Electrochim. Acta · 2019 · 298 · 11210.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.078 ↗
10. Hassan · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2002 · 4 · 12510.1002/1527-2648(200203)4:3<125::AID-ADEM125>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
11. Chen · Electrochim. Acta · 2008 · 53 · 782510.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.063 ↗
12. Sumi · Electrochim. Acta · 2020 · 33910.1016/j.electacta.2020.135913 ↗
13. Subotić · Energy Convers. Manag. · 2020 · 22610.1016/j.enconman.2020.113509 ↗
14. Hauch · Solid State Ion. · 2016 · 293 · 2710.1016/j.ssi.2016.06.003 ↗
15. Yan · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 258 · 125410.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.180 ↗
16. Leonide · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2008 · 155 · B3610.1149/1.2801372 ↗
17. Schefold · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B89710.1149/1.3138701 ↗
18. Caliandro · J. Power Sources · 2019 · 436 · 22683810.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226838 ↗
19. Fang · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · F90710.1149/2.0941508jes ↗
20. Hjalmarsson · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 262 · 31610.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.133 ↗
21. Rao · Fuel Cells · 2019 · 19 · 44510.1002/fuce.201800166 ↗
22. Leonide · ECS Trans. · 2009 · 19 · 8110.1149/1.3247567 ↗
23. Primdahl · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · 340910.1149/1.1838026 ↗
24. Pan · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · F10610.1149/2.0801602jes ↗
25. Koyama · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2001 · 148 · A79510.1149/1.1378290 ↗
26. Papurello · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 258 · 9810.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.052 ↗
27. Endler-Schuck · Solid State Ion. · 2015 · 269 · 6710.1016/j.ssi.2014.11.018 ↗
28. Yang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 41710.1016/j.cej.2021.129260 ↗
29. Nechache · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 210 · 59610.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.014 ↗
30. Wuillemin · ECS Trans. · 2013 · 57 · 56110.1149/05701.0561ecst ↗
31. Köck · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 1642810.1021/acsami.6b03566 ↗
32. Kim · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 38 · 656910.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.115 ↗
33. Königshofer · J. Power Sources · 2021 · 49710.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229875 ↗