Examining Performance Loss Mechanisms in Lithium-Ion Batteries with the High-Voltage Mn-Rich Spinel Positive Electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
The high-voltage spinel, with the nominal composition of LiNi0.5-xMn1.5+xO4 (LNMO), could be a sustainable alternative to the layered-oxide positive electrodes used in lithium-ion batteries. However, commercial acceptance has been limited as LNMO cells display rapid performance loss during cycling. To examine reasons for this loss we prepared cells with LNMO-based positive and either graphite or lithium titanate (LTO) based negative electrodes. Our initial cells displayed high impedance and rapid impedance rise during cycling. Adding single walled carbon nanotubes in the positive lowered initial cell impedance but impedance increased during cycling because of coating delamination from the Al foil. Using a primed Al current collector solved the delamination problem: cells with this current collector showed only a small impedance rise. Regarding capacity, cells with the LTO negative showed higher initial capacities and smaller fade. Our data indicate that cell capacity retention is determined by reduction reactions at the negative electrode that lower capacity and oxidation reactions at the positive electrode that increase capacity: both types of reactions deplete the cell electrolyte during extended cycling. All things considered, species generated at high voltages, either in the electrolyte or at the LNMO electrode, drive cell capacity fade.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Thackeray · Mater. Res. Bull. · 1983 · 18 · 46110.1016/0025-5408(83)90138-1 ↗
2. Manthiram · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 133910.1039/c3ee42981d ↗
3. Fu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2023 · 1110.1039/D3TA01777J ↗
4. Zhan · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 24310.1039/C7EE03122J ↗
5. Liang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 810.1039/D0TA02812F ↗
6. Xu · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 287110.1021/acsenergylett.9b01871 ↗
7. Dettlaff-Weglikowska · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · A17410.1149/1.3526601 ↗
8. Bizot · Electrochem. Commun. · 2021 · 12610.1016/j.elecom.2021.107008 ↗
9. Kuenzel · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 21810.1021/acsaem.9b01302 ↗
10. Rodrigues · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A99610.1149/2.0401906jes ↗
11. Abraham · Int. J. Energy Res. · 2010 · 34 · 19010.1002/er.1665 ↗
12. Gilbert · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A38910.1149/2.1111702jes ↗
13. Fehse · Chem. Mater. · 2022 · 34 · 652910.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01360 ↗
14. Qiao · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2015 · 11910.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07479 ↗
15. Jin · RSC Adv. · 2023 · 1310.1039/D3RA00586K ↗
16. Arunkumar · Electrochim. Acta · 2005 · 50 · 556810.1016/j.electacta.2005.03.033 ↗
17. Konya · Powder Diffr. · 2019 · 34 · S810.1017/S0885715619000083 ↗
18. Pang · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 1810.1039/C6CP00947F ↗
19. Gaberscek · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2008 · 11 · A17010.1149/1.2964220 ↗
20. Landesfeind · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 16410.1149/2.0131709jes ↗
21. Mayer · Energy Technology · 2020 · 810.1002/ente.201900161 ↗
22. Qi · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 1610.1039/C4CP04113E ↗
23. Li · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2006 · 9 · A12610.1149/1.2161442 ↗
24. Pritzl · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A58210.1149/2.0451904jes ↗
25. Okasinski · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 2210.1039/D0CP04436A ↗
26. Markovsky · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 157 · A42310.1149/1.3294774 ↗
27. Yoon · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 32
28. Rodrigues · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 16510.1149/2.0611809jes ↗
29. Zuo · Small · 2024 · 2010.1002/smll.202306807 ↗
30. Tornheim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/ab9ee8 ↗
31. Smith · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 15810.1149/1.3625232 ↗
32. Keil · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 16410.1149/2.0091701jes ↗
33. Sloop · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 119-121 · 33010.1016/S0378-7753(03)00149-6 ↗
34. Jusys · Electrochim. Acta · 2019 · 314 · 18810.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.076 ↗
35. Metzger · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A79810.1149/2.1151605jes ↗
36. He · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 239 · 26910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.141 ↗
37. Shkrob · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2016 · 12010.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05756 ↗
38. Yu · Small Methods · 2021 · 5
39. Zou · Energy Storage Mater. · 2021 · 43 · 49910.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.033 ↗