CNT-reinforced iron and titanium nanocomposites: Strength and deformation mechanisms
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The mechanical reinforcement of embedding a carbon nanotube inside metals with different crystal structures (BCC-Fe and HCP-Ti) is investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Two metallic elements were chosen representing different crystal structures, based on the foreseeable technological benefits of improving the strength of these widely used metals while reducing their weight. Tensile and compressive loadings are applied to CNT-Fe and CNT-Ti nanocomposites which are modeled by inserting a (6,6) CNT into a single-crystal rectangular prism. Two limit boundary conditions are applied to the embedded CNT: (i) loading applied only to the metal matrix and (ii) loading applied to both the metal matrix and the embedded CNT. Curves of energy vs strain and stress vs strain are presented and the mechanical properties are calculated for both situations. Additionally, the mechanical behavior and buckling of the encapsulated carbon nanotube as a result of compression loading applied to the metal nanocomposites is also studied. Lastly, an analysis of the influence of the embedded CNT in the deformation mechanisms of the nanocomposites is presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Iijima · Nature · 1991 · 35410.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. Bakshi · Int Mater Rev · 2010 · 55 · 4110.1179/095066009X12572530170543 ↗
3. Guo · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 472610.1088/0957-4484/17/18/033 ↗
4. Sun · Carbon · 2011 · 4 · 140810.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.008 ↗
5. Wang · J Phys Condens Matter · 2009 · 2110.1088/0953-8984/21/30/305301 ↗
6. Guo · Carbon · 2010 · 48 · 412910.1016/j.carbon.2010.07.023 ↗
7. Wang · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 103
8. Inoue · Chem Phys Lett · 2008 · 464 · 16010.1016/j.cplett.2008.09.014 ↗
9. Inoue · Chem Phys Lett · 2009 · 469 · 12510.1016/j.cplett.2008.12.093 ↗
10. Song · Phys B Condens Matter · 2011 · 406 · 99210.1016/j.physb.2010.12.045 ↗
11. Zhang · Appl Surf Sci · 2018 · 433 · 54010.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.241 ↗
12. Yazdandoost · Phys. Rev. Mat. · 2017 · 1
13. Montazeri · Appl Surf Sci · 2018 · 457 · 107210.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.038 ↗
14. Kumar · Mater Chem Phys · 2017 · 202 · 32910.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.043 ↗
15. Roman · Adv Eng Mater · 2014 · 16 · 86210.1002/adem.201400160 ↗
16. Xiao · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 11540610.1103/PhysRevB.73.115406 ↗
17. Song · Comput Mater Sci · 2010 · 49 · 89910.1016/j.commatsci.2010.06.044 ↗
18. Song · Phys Lett A · 2010 · 374 · 106810.1016/j.physleta.2009.12.035 ↗
19. Silvestre · Compos Sci Technol · 2014 · 90 · 1610.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.027 ↗
20. Choi · Compos B Eng · 2008 · 91 · 11910.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.031 ↗
21. Xiang · Comput Mater Sci · 2017 · 128 · 35910.1016/j.commatsci.2016.11.032 ↗
22. Bashirvand · Mater Des · 2016 · 91 · 30610.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.111 ↗
23. Duan · Physica E: · 2017 · 88 · 25910.1016/j.physe.2017.01.015 ↗
24. Duan · Mater Des · 2017 · 133 · 45510.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.019 ↗
25. Yan · Comput Mater Sci · 2018 · 151 · 27310.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.012 ↗
26. Sharma · J Compos Mater · 2017 · 51 · 329910.1177/0021998316682363 ↗
27. Faria · Compos B Eng · 2018 · 145 · 10810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.033 ↗
28. Munizaga · J Appl Phys · 2017 · 12110.1063/1.4986484 ↗
29. Zhou · J Compos Mater · 2016 · 50 · 19110.1177/0021998315572710 ↗
30. Komanduri · Int J Mech Sci · 2001 · 43 · 223710.1016/S0020-7403(01)00043-1 ↗
31. Healy · Acta Mater · 2014 · 70 · 10510.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.021 ↗
32. Stuart · J Chem Phys · 2000 · 112 · 647210.1063/1.481208 ↗
33. Mendelev · Phil Mag · 2003 · 83 · 397710.1080/14786430310001613264 ↗
34. Mendelev · J Chem Phys · 2016 · 14510.1063/1.4964654 ↗
35. Kutana · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 9710.1103/PhysRevLett.97.245501 ↗
36. Zhen · Phys Status Solidi · 1983 · 78 · 59510.1002/pssa.2210780226 ↗
37. Plimpton · J. Comp. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
38. Zimmerman · Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · 12 · S31910.1088/0965-0393/12/4/S03 ↗
39. Tsai · J Chem Phys · 1979 · 70 · 137510.1063/1.437577 ↗
40. Sainath · Comput Mater Sci · 2016 · 111 · 40610.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.055 ↗
41. Chang · J Mater Sci Technol · 2018 · 34 · 86410.1016/j.jmst.2017.03.011 ↗
42. Ren · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2014 · 615 · 2210.1016/j.msea.2014.07.065 ↗
43. Silvestre · Compos Struct · 2012 · 94 · 135210.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.029 ↗
44. A. G. Jackson, Ed. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1991, 83–88.
45. Meyers · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 402510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-7 ↗
46. Stukowski · Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng · 2012 · 2010.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007 ↗
47. Larsen · Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng · 2016 · 2410.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055007 ↗
48. Stukowski · Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · 1810.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
49. Dutta · Acta Mater · 2017 · 125 · 21910.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.062 ↗
50. Britton · Proc. R. Soc. A · 2015 · 471 · 217810.1098/rspa.2014.0881 ↗
51. Sun · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 47310.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.033 ↗