Commentary and Notes on the Original Derivations of the Scharifker-Hills Model
Source abstract
Abstract
The Scharifker-Hills (S-H) model for the potentiostatic transients is one of the most widely utilized model in electrodeposition. With the concept of diffusion zones and the Kolmogorov-Johnson-Mehl-Avrami (KJMA) model, the occurrence of a peak current in the potentiostatic transient was elucidated. Unfortunately, the derivations of the S-H model had been scattered among several original papers. Herein, we have summarized the S-H model into the framework of the diffusion zone problem and compared the S-H model with the Classical model, the Scharifker and Mostany (S-M) model, the approach by Sluyters-Rehbach et al. (the SRWBS model), and the Heerman-Tarallo/Mirkin-Nilov (H-T/M-N) model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Hills · Electrochim. Acta · 1974 · 19 · 65710.1016/0013-4686(74)80008-3 ↗
2. Astley · Trans. Faraday Soc. · 1968 · 64 · 19210.1039/tf9686400192 ↗
3. Hyde · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2003 · 549 · 110.1016/S0022-0728(03)00250-X ↗
4. Sluyters-Rehbach · J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. · 1987 · 236 · 110.1016/0022-0728(87)88014-2 ↗
5. Heerman · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 1999 · 470 · 7010.1016/S0022-0728(99)00221-1 ↗
6. Bobbert · Physica A · 1987 · 146 · 6910.1016/0378-4371(87)90223-8 ↗
7. Shao · Coatings · 2021 · 11 · 156310.3390/coatings11121563 ↗
8. Sun
9. Ustarroz · Current Opinion in Electrochemistry · 2020 · 19 · 14410.1016/j.coelec.2019.12.001 ↗
10. Ustarroz · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 1155010.1021/ja402598k ↗
11. Politi · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2018 · 22 · 308510.1007/s10008-018-4011-2 ↗
12. Heerman · Electrochim. Acta · 2001 · 47 · 90510.1016/S0013-4686(01)00792-7 ↗
13. Mirkin · J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. · 1990 · 283 · 3510.1016/0022-0728(90)87377-V ↗
14. Scharifker · Electrochim. Acta · 1983 · 28 · 87910.1016/0013-4686(83)85163-9 ↗
15. Gunawardena · J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. · 1982 · 138 · 22510.1016/0022-0728(82)85080-8 ↗
16. Scharifker · J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. · 1984 · 177 · 1310.1016/0022-0728(84)80207-7 ↗
17. Scharifker · 2007 · 512
18. Bard · 2001 · p. 156
19. Tong · J. Mater. Res. · 1997 · 12 · 150110.1557/JMR.1997.0206 ↗
20. Barmak · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B · 2018 · 49 · 361610.1007/s11663-010-9421-1 ↗
21. Mamme · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 197 · 30710.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.035 ↗
22. Bergmann · J. Cryst. Growth · 2008 · 310 · 313510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.03.034 ↗
23. Bard · 2022
24. Di Biagio · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2019 · 23 · 266710.1007/s10008-019-04361-y ↗
25. Kosov · Materials · 2022 · 15 · 360310.3390/ma15103603 ↗
26. Kruijt · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 1994 · 371 · 1310.1016/0022-0728(93)03242-H ↗
27. Teran · Physical Review B · 2010 · 8110.1103/PhysRevB.81.075319 ↗
28. Selman · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1971 · 118 · 107010.1149/1.2408249 ↗
29. Sun · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · D33910.1149/2.1231908jes ↗