journal article·2023-02-01Open access

Fully Printed pH Sensor based on Polyaniline/Graphite Nanocomposites

Shirin Mahinnezhad, Ricardo Izquierdo, Andy Shih

Abstract

Recently, there is an exceptional growth in research related to the development of flexible sensors for health analysis. pH measurements can be done non-invasively and continuously, making it an excellent parameter for monitoring different stages of wound healing. Here, we report pH functionality of a polyaniline/graphite (PANI/G) composite in a fully-printed potentiometric pH sensor and the effect of graphite loading on sensor functionality. PANI/G composites in different ratios were aerosol-jet printed on Ag/AgCl with and without a graphite layer as the working electrode in a two-electrode potentiometric sensor on a flexible substrate. The role of graphite layer on working electrode in functionality of the sensor has been investigated. The PANI/G composites were prepared by a solution processing method using a graphite paste and polyaniline emeraldine salt powder. Samples were characterized by XRD, SEM, and FTIR analysis to investigate the relations between the physical and chemical relations and the performance of the sensors. The sensors were tested in the pH range from 3 to 10, exhibiting a linear, stable and near-Nernstian sensitivity of 53 mV pH−1 and a response time of 15 s.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Conducting polymers and applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Seo · J. Ind. Eng. Chem. · 2018 · 64 · 9710.1016/j.jiec.2018.03.031 ↗
2. Scott · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022 · 110.1149/2754-2726/ac5fb3 ↗
3. Santos · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022 · 110.1149/2754-2726/ac5cdf ↗
4. Ray · Chem. Rev. · 2019 · 119 · 546110.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00573 ↗
5. Stefan-van Staden · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022 · 110.1149/2754-2726/ac5ddd ↗
6. Chaudhary · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022 · 1 · 01360110.1149/2754-2726/ac5ac6 ↗
7. Singh · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022 · 1 · 02340110.1149/2754-2726/ac70e2 ↗
8. Grummt · Anal. Chim. Acta · 1997 · 357 · 25310.1016/S0003-2670(97)00572-2 ↗
9. Varela · J. Braz. Chem. Soc. · 2000 · 11 · 3210.1590/S0103-50532000000100007 ↗
10. Qu · Polymers · 2018 · 10 · 119110.3390/polym10111191 ↗
11. Alam · Ceram. Int. · 2017 · 43 · 1137610.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.345 ↗
12. Namilae · Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. · 2019 · 26 · 133310.1080/15376494.2018.1432812 ↗
13. Bychanok · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 5110.1088/1361-6463/aab1a5 ↗
14. Fukushima · J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. · 2006 · 85 · 23510.1007/s10973-005-7344-x ↗
15. Toan · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022 · 110.1149/2754-2726/ac8436 ↗
16. Sharma · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022 · 110.1149/2754-2726/ac612c ↗
17. Bilbao · Sens. Actuators B Chem. · 2021 · 34610.1016/j.snb.2021.130558 ↗
18. Guinovart · Electroanalysis · 2014 · 26 · 134510.1002/elan.201300558 ↗
19. Crowley · Chem. Pap. · 2013 · 67 · 77110.2478/s11696-012-0301-9 ↗
20. Atiqah · Polym. Bull. · 2018 · 75 · 20910.1007/s00289-017-2031-1 ↗
21. Sapurina · New Polym. Spec. Appl. · 2012 · 740 · 272
22. Wang · Electrochim. Acta · 2012 · 66 · 15110.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.088 ↗
23. Gupta · Opt. Commun. · 1997 · 140 · 3210.1016/S0030-4018(97)00162-4 ↗
24. Adhikari · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2004 · 29 · 69910.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.03.002 ↗
25. Qi · Sens. Actuators B Chem. · 2014 · 202 · 73210.1016/j.snb.2014.05.138 ↗
26. Clark · React. Funct. Polym. · 2009 · 69 · 59410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2009.03.011 ↗
27. Alizadeh · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2013 · 248 · 40110.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.12.019 ↗
28. Ihdene · Sens. Actuators B Chem. · 2014 · 203 · 64710.1016/j.snb.2014.07.030 ↗
29. Kim · Sens. Actuators B Chem. · 2005 · 108 · 40910.1016/j.snb.2004.11.072 ↗
30. Nobrega · Polym. Degrad. Stab. · 2015 · 113 · 6610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.015 ↗
31. Yu · Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. · 2012 · 43 · 203910.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.001 ↗
32. Ho · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022 · 110.1149/2754-2726/ac8438 ↗
33. Das · ECS Sens. Plus · 2022
34. Yang · Mater. Lett. · 2021 · 28810.1016/j.matlet.2021.129335 ↗
35. Pawar · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2012 · 125 · 141810.1002/app.35468 ↗
36. Boday · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2012 · 358 · 157510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.04.020 ↗
37. Li · J. Mater. Sci., Mater. Electron. · 2011 · 22 · 101610.1007/s10854-010-0252-2 ↗
38. Sun · Appl. Energy · 2021 · 28210.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116041 ↗
39. McCreery · Chem. Rev. · 2008 · 108 · 264610.1021/cr068076m ↗
40. Xiang · Mater. Lett. · 2010 · 64 · 131310.1016/j.matlet.2010.03.018 ↗
41. Zeng · Appl. Energy · 2014 · 115 · 60310.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.061 ↗
42. Bourdo · Carbon · 2005 · 43 · 298310.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.016 ↗
43. Dai · 2004
44. Diantoro · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2018 · 101110.1088/1742-6596/1011/1/012065 ↗
45. Kakde · Indian J. Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 10 · 2010.17485/ijst/2017/v10i20/112920 ↗
46. Holland · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 1996 · 8 · 299110.1088/0953-8984/8/17/011 ↗
47. Ameen · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 4210.1088/0022-3727/42/10/105104 ↗
48. Elnaggar · J. Nanostructure Chem. · 2017 · 7 · 7510.1007/s40097-017-0217-6 ↗
49. Atiqah · Mater Sci. Forum · 2017 · 889 · 910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.889.9 ↗
50. Yoon · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2017 · 490 · 5310.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.033 ↗
51. Hu · TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. · 2016 · 76 · 10210.1016/j.trac.2015.11.004 ↗