An Energy and Power Dense Aqueous Zinc-Ion Hybrid Supercapacitor with Low Leakage Current and Long Cycle Life
Source abstract
Abstract
Imparting high energy density to already power dense capacitor leads to hybrid supercapacitor (SC), which is most sought after in automobile, heavy-duty electronics application, and internet of things. The hybrid SCs with lithium or sodium ion chemistry demand organic electrolytes for their operation, which is environmental unfriendly and poses fire-hazard. As an alternative, here we report a low cost and highly safe energetic hybrid SC based on zinc-ion chemistry operated in 3 M ZnSO 4 with high surface area (1018 ± 4 m 2 g −1 ) hierarchical porous carbon cathode material derived from the Tamarindusindica seeds (ACTS-800), a bio-source. The hybrid SC demonstrates a maximum energy density of 127 (± 3) Wh kg −1 (254 μ Wh cm −2 ) at 0.1 A g −1 and power density of 7920 (± 24) W kg −1 (15.84 mW cm −2 ) at 10 A g −1 . Besides having excellent power/energy density values, ∼ 100% capacity retention over 5000 galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles was observed. The most interesting feature of this SC is its low open-circuit voltage decay (34% in 60 h) and low leakage current density (11 mA g −1 ), which allows it to hold charge for longer duration qualifying it as one of the best aqueous SC known in the literature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced battery technologies research · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 910.1002/aenm.201902915 ↗
2. Deng · Chem. Commun. · 2019 · 55 · 148610.1039/C8CC08391F ↗
3. Li · Adv. Sci. · 2019 · 610.1002/advs.201801665 ↗
4. Gao · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 961110.1039/c2ee22284a ↗
5. Xu · Angew. Chemie · 2012 · 124 · 95710.1002/ange.201106307 ↗
6. Chen · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 778410.1039/C9TA00733D ↗
7. Ma · Energy Storage Mater. · 2019 · 20 · 33510.1016/j.ensm.2018.10.020 ↗
8. Nie · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 110.1038/s41598-018-37186-2 ↗
9. Wang · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 3010.1002/adma.201800963 ↗
10. Ye · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 282 · 17410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.028 ↗
11. Dong · Energy Storage Mater. · 2018 · 13 · 9610.1016/j.ensm.2018.01.003 ↗
12. Liu · Energy Storage Mater. · 2020 · 25 · 85810.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.004 ↗
13. Li · Energy Storage Mater. · 2020 · 31 · 25210.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.014 ↗
14. Yang · Front. Chem. · 2019 · 7 · 27410.3389/fchem.2019.00274 ↗
15. Ramesh · ACS omega · 2018 · 3 · 1283210.1021/acsomega.8b01850 ↗
16. Chen · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 431910.1021/nn300920e ↗
17. Ding · RSC Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 1258110.1039/c3ra41260a ↗
18. Raja · Sustain. Energy Fuels · 2019 · 3 · 76010.1039/C8SE00530C ↗
19. Liu · Nano Res. · 2019 · 12 · 283510.1007/s12274-019-2521-6 ↗
20. Liu · New J. Chem. · 2019 · 43 · 371310.1039/C8NJ05718D ↗
21. He · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2017 · 5 · 1806410.1039/C7TA04685E ↗
22. Yang · Adv. Sci. · 2017 · 410.1002/advs.201600408 ↗
23. Bar‐Tow · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1999 · 146 · 82410.1149/1.1391688 ↗
24. Wang · Inorg. Chem. Commun. · 2020 · 11410.1016/j.inoche.2020.107817 ↗
25. Sun · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 336710.1039/C8EE02567C ↗
26. Zhang · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 3110.1002/adma.201904948 ↗
27. Zhuo · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/aba3ff ↗
28. Potphode · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/abbfdb ↗
29. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1492510.1021/jp074464w ↗
30. Shao · Energy Storage Mater. · 2019 · 18 · 45610.1016/j.ensm.2018.12.017 ↗
31. Cheng · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 16610.1149/2.1081906jes ↗
32. Alshareef · J. Electron. Mater. · 2017 · 46 · 162810.1007/s11664-016-5206-x ↗
33. Tomiyasu · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 110.1038/srep45048 ↗
34. Ramavath · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 489 · 86710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.343 ↗
35. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 863310.1039/C9TA01028A ↗
36. Abbas · Energy Technol. · 2019 · 710.1002/ente.201900430 ↗
37. Menzel · Electrochim. Acta · 2020 · 33210.1016/j.electacta.2019.135435 ↗
38. Ike · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 66110.1039/C5CP05459A ↗
39. Fic · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 584210.1039/C1EE02262H ↗
40. Ratajczak · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 2014 · 44 · 47510.1007/s10800-013-0644-0 ↗
41. Macdonald · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1988 · 135 · 241010.1149/1.2095348 ↗
42. Oda · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 1848110.1021/ja4077342 ↗
43. Li · Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 829910.1002/anie.201102320 ↗
44. Qi · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 676210.1021/ja400757c ↗
45. Pan · Nat. Energy · 2016 · 1 · 110.1038/nenergy.2016.39 ↗
46. Ye · Natl Sci. Rev. · 2020 · 7 · 19110.1093/nsr/nwz140 ↗
47. Durmus · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 1010.1002/aenm.202000089 ↗
48. Du Pasquier · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 115 · 17110.1016/S0378-7753(02)00718-8 ↗
49. Simon · Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 84510.1038/nmat2297 ↗
50. Ahn · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 4051910.1149/1945-7111/ab77a1 ↗
51. Chen · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 5050610.1149/1945-7111/ab6a84 ↗