Improving Performance and Durability of Low Temperature Direct Ammonia Fuel Cells: Effect of Backpressure and Oxygen Reduction Catalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
Low temperature direct ammonia fuel cells (DAFCs) are attractive for transportation applications. The primary obstacle to their commercial use is their low performance and poor durability. In the present work, we focus on improving DAFCs performance and durability by examining the effect of operating backpressure and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts such as Acta 4020, Pd/C and Pt/C. DAFCs with Acta 4020 cathode can reach a peak power density of 390 mW cm −2 which is among the best reported performance, but they can be operated for a period of 11 h at 300 mA cm −2 . DAFCs with Pd/C cathode offer a moderate performance with a peak power density of 304 mW cm −2 , but has a much improved durability - a continuous operation for up to 36 h with a slow decay rate of ∼1 mV h −1 at 300 mA cm −2 . In addition, the degradation pathways for DAFCs with Pd/C cathode are probed by characterizing the initial and final electrodes by XPS, suggesting that cathodic Pd dissolution occurs during the durability test.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhao · Joule · 2019 · 3 · 247210.1016/j.joule.2019.07.005 ↗
2. Abbasi · Current Opinion in Electrochemistry · 2020 · 21 · 33510.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.021 ↗
3. Santamaria · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 10450710.1149/1945-7111/ab995e ↗
4. Guo · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 47610.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228454 ↗
5. Lan · Electrochem. Solid State Lett. · 2010 · 13 · B8310.1149/1.3428469 ↗
6. Assumpcao · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 514810.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.053 ↗
7. Assumpção · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 268 · 12910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.025 ↗
8. Assumpção · Appl. Catalysis B · 2015 · 174–175 · 13610.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.021 ↗
9. Lee · RSC Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 563810.1039/c3ra44057e ↗
10. Gottesfeld · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · J340510.1149/2.0431815jes ↗
11. Endo · Electrochim. Acta · 2004 · 49 · 250310.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.025 ↗
12. Suzuki · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 208 · 25710.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.043 ↗
13. Li · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 228 · 35110.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.020 ↗
14. Fu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 1788310.1039/C4TA03601H ↗
15. Okanishi · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 173 · 36410.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.066 ↗
16. Silva · Appl. Catal. A-Gen. · 2015 · 490 · 13310.1016/j.apcata.2014.11.015 ↗
17. Fomena · Chemelectrochem · 2017 · 4 · 132710.1002/celc.201600844 ↗
18. Jiang · Electrochem. Commun. · 2017 · 75 · 5210.1016/j.elecom.2016.12.017 ↗
19. Kang · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2017 · 42 · 1895910.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.216 ↗
20. Wang · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 150610.1038/s41467-019-09503-4 ↗
21. Peng · Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit. · 2019 · 58 · 104610.1002/anie.201811099 ↗
22. Neyerlin · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2006 · 153 · A195510.1149/1.2266294 ↗
23. Xu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2006 · 153 · L110.1149/1.2128654 ↗
24. Song · Electrochim. Acta · 2007 · 52 · 255210.1016/j.electacta.2006.09.008 ↗
25. Pratt · J. Propul. Power · 2007 · 23 · 43710.2514/1.20535 ↗
26. Benziger · AIChE J. · 2011 · 57 · 250510.1002/aic.12455 ↗
27. Wang · ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 64510.1021/acsenergylett.7b00071 ↗
28. Parry · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 253010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.027 ↗
29. Brun · J Electron Spectrosc · 1999 · 104 · 5510.1016/S0368-2048(98)00312-0 ↗