journal article·2020-01-06Open access

Simple Way of Making Free-Standing Battery Electrodes and their Use in Enabling Half-Cell Impedance Measurements via μ-Reference Electrode

Robert Morasch, Bharatkumar Suthar, Hubert A. Gasteiger

Abstract

Free-standing electrodes can be useful for a plethora of diagnostic measurements, as they allow transmissive measurements, stacking of electrodes, and/or measurements where the current collector would be disturbing the signal. Another advantage displayed in this publication is their use in Li-ion battery half-cells to decrease and stabilize the impedance of the counter electrode that is usually made of metallic lithium, allowing to conduct electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of a battery-type working electrode via μ-reference electrode which would otherwise show artefacts over a wide range of frequencies. Using measurements on an equivalent circuit mimicking a Li-ion battery half-cell with a μ-reference electrode we show how such artefacts arise from the large resistance in the μ-reference electrode and the imbalance in working and counter electrode resistance. We also show how the use of a free-standing graphite electrode attached to the Li-metal counter electrode (Li/FSG) reduces the counter electrode resistance and allows an artefact-free impedance measurement of the working electrode via a μ-reference electrode. Finally, we show the stability of the Li/FSG electrode and compare it to a Li-metal electrode.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Aurbach · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1995 · 142 · 287310.1149/1.2048658 ↗
2. Zaban · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 308910.1021/jp9514279 ↗
3. Song · J. Power Sources · 2002 · 111 · 25510.1016/S0378-7753(02)00310-5 ↗
4. Burns · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · A141710.1149/2.084112jes ↗
5. Petibon · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 160 · A11710.1149/2.005302jes ↗
6. Ogihara · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · A103410.1149/2.057207jes ↗
7. Chen · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 96 · 32110.1016/S0378-7753(00)00666-2 ↗
8. Solchenbach · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A226510.1149/2.0581610jes ↗
9. Landesfeind · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A177310.1149/2.0131709jes ↗
10. Pritzl · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A214510.1149/2.0461810jes ↗
11. Gómez-Cámer · Electrochem. Commun. · 2013 · 34 · 20810.1016/j.elecom.2013.06.016 ↗
12. Raijmakers · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 259 · 51710.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.132 ↗
13. Ender · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A7110.1149/2.0231702jes ↗
14. Costard · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A8010.1149/2.0241702jes ↗
15. Battistel · Electrochim. Acta · 2014 · 135 · 13310.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.011 ↗
16. Raccichini · Batteries · 2019 · 5 · 110.3390/batteries5010012 ↗
17. Thorat · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 188 · 59210.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.032 ↗
18. Pouraghajan · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A264410.1149/2.0611811jes ↗
19. Linsenmann · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A366810.1149/2.0741915jes ↗