journal article·2012Open access

A Model-Based Interpretation of the Influence of Anode Surface Chemistry on Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electrochemical Impedance Spectra

Huayang Zhu, Alexander Kromp, Andre Leonide, Ellen Ivers-Tiffée, Olaf Deutschmann, Robert J. Kee

Abstract

This paper reports a combined experimental and modeling study to explain the influences of detailed surface chemistry within solid-oxide fuel cell (SOFC) composite anode structures on electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS). Typically, SOFC models either neglect surface chemistry or include global reforming and water-gas-shift reactions using empirical rate expressions. In addition to improving the fidelity of representing heterogeneous chemistry within the anode, incorporating detailed surface chemistry is found to introduce capacity effects that alter the EIS. The model predicts frequency shifts that are measured in the complex impedance of SOFCs operating on hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and syngas mixtures. The significant influence of detailed heterogeneous chemistry on SOFC EIS is reported for the first time.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Barsoukov E. Macdonald J. R. , Impedance spectroscopy theory, experiment, and applications, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.10.1002/0471716243 ↗
2. Orazem M. E. Tribollet B. , Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2008.10.1002/9780470381588 ↗
3. Deutschmann O. , editor, Modeling and simulation of heterogeneous catalytic reactions: From the molecular process to the technical system, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2011.10.1002/9783527639878 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.211660710.1149/1.2116607 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.08.00310.1016/j.apcata.2005.08.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.08.01710.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.08.017 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.08610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.086 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.02310.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.023 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.222006510.1149/1.2220065 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.294341110.1149/1.2943411 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.350529610.1149/1.3505296 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.02010.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.020 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.01910.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.019 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apcata.2003.11.03310.1016/j.apcata.2003.11.033 ↗
15. Stöver D. Buchkremer H. P. Huijsmans J. P. P. , MEA/cell preparation methods: Europe/USA, In Vielstich W. Lamm A. Gasteiger H. A. , editors, Handbook of Fuel Cells, pages 1015–1031. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2003.
16. Stöver D. Buchkremer H. P. Tietz F. Menzler N. H. , Trends in processing of SOFC components, In Huijsmans J. P. P. , editor, Proceedings of the 5th European Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Forum, pages 1–9, 2002.
17. 10.1149/1.290886010.1149/1.2908860 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.07.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.07.019 ↗
19. 10.1149/1.280137210.1149/1.2801372 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.052 ↗
21. 10.1149/1.359717710.1149/1.3597177 ↗
22. Johnson D. , ZPlot, ZView electrochemical impedance software, Technical report, Scribner Associates, Inc., Southern Pines, NC, USA, 2000, Version 2.3b.
23. 10.1023/A:102059952516010.1023/A:1020599525160 ↗
24. 10.1149/1.327004710.1149/1.3270047 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.351841310.1149/1.3518413 ↗
26. Mason E. A. Malinauskas A. P. , Gas Transport in Porous Media: the Dusty-Gas Model. American Elsevier, New York, 1983.
27. 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.27710.1016/j.proci.2004.08.277 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00358-610.1016/S0378-7753(03)00358-6 ↗
29. 10.1149/1.277209210.1149/1.2772092 ↗
30. 10.1149/1.324756710.1149/1.3247567 ↗
31. 10.1149/2.015206jes10.1149/2.015206jes ↗