Polymer-in-Ceramic Nanocomposite Solid Electrolyte for Lithium Metal Batteries Encompassing PEO-Grafted TiO2 Nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium Metal Batteries (LMB) require solid or quasi-solid electrolytes able to block dendrites formation during cell cycling. Polymer-in-ceramic nanocomposites with the ceramic fraction exceeding the one normally used as the filler (>10 ÷ 15 wt%) are among the most interesting options on the table. Here, we report on a new hybrid material encompassing brush-like TiO2 nanocrystals functionalized with low molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). The nanocomposite electrolyte membranes are then obtained by blending the brush-like nanocrystals with high molecular weight PEO and LiTFSI. The intrinsic chemical compatibility among the PEO moieties allows a TiO2 content as high as ∼39 wt% (90:10 w/w functionalized nanocrystals/PEO-LiTFSI), while maintaining good processability and mechanical resistance. The 50:50 w/w nanocomposite electrolyte (18.8 wt% functionalized TiO2) displays ionic conductivity of 3 × 10−4 S cm−1 at 70 °C. Stripping/plating experiments show an excellent long-term behavior even at relatively high currents of 200 μA cm−2. Upon testing in a lab-scale Li/electrolyte/LiFePO4 cell, the material delivers 130 mAh g−1 and 120 mAh g−1 after 40 and 50 cycles at 0.05 and 0.1 mA, respectively, with Coulombic efficiency exceeding 99.5%, which demonstrates the very promising prospects of these newly developed nanocomposite solid electrolyte for future development of LMBs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Pomerantseva · Science · 2019 · 36610.1126/science.aan8285 ↗
2. Albertus · Nat. Energy · 2018 · 3 · 1610.1038/s41560-017-0047-2 ↗
3. Bruce · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 1910.1038/nmat3191 ↗
4. Quartarone · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167
5. Quartarone · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2011 · 40 · 252510.1039/c0cs00081g ↗
6. Liu · Joule · 2018 · 2 · 83310.1016/j.joule.2018.03.008 ↗
7. Tikekar · Nat. Energy · 2016 · 1 · 1611410.1038/nenergy.2016.114 ↗
8. Wang · Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 102610.1038/nmat4369 ↗
9. Keller · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 353 · 28710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.014 ↗
10. Bachman · Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 116 · 14010.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00563 ↗
11. Manthiram · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2017 · 2 · 1610310.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 ↗
12. Quartarone · Solid State Ionics · 1998 · 110 · 110.1016/S0167-2738(98)00114-3 ↗
13. Fan · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 810.1002/aenm.201702657 ↗
14. Chen · Nano Energy · 2018 · 46 · 17610.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.037 ↗
15. Keller · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 392 · 20610.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.099 ↗
16. Li · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 706910.1021/acsami.7b18123 ↗
17. Bonizzoni · PCCP · 2019 · 21 · 614210.1039/C9CP00405J ↗
18. Piana · Journal of Energy Storage · 2019 · 2610.1016/j.est.2019.100947 ↗
19. Selli · Chem. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 753110.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02329 ↗
20. Magistris · Solid State Ionics · 2000 · 136–137 · 124110.1016/S0167-2738(00)00594-4 ↗
21. Capiglia · Solid State Ionics · 1999 · 118 · 7310.1016/S0167-2738(98)00457-3 ↗
22. Mustarelli · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 722810.1103/PhysRevB.60.7228 ↗
23. Meligrana · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 160 · 51610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.067 ↗