journal article·2019Open access

Correlative X-ray Tomographic Imaging of Catalyst Layer Degradation in Fuel Cells

Robin T. White, Dilip Ramani, Sebastian Eberhardt, Marina Najm, Francesco P. Orfino, Monica Dutta, Erik Kjeang

Abstract

Effective catalyst layer design is vital for high-performing polymer electrolyte fuel cells. However, the desired catalyst layer structure may be compromised by operational degradation, causing performance decay. The present work investigates the multi-scale catalyst layer structure and properties across different stages of degradation, including liquid water distribution in an operating fuel cell. A correlative, multi-scale imaging workflow with a combined analysis by operando lab-based micro-X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and nano-XCT is developed for this purpose. From operando XCT results, the catalyst layer solid area fraction was found to gradually decrease by 25% with crack formation and severe localized corrosion accompanied by up to 50% thinning and significantly altered liquid water distribution. Localized degradation features such as nano-scale cracks and internal pore-size distribution changes were resolved using nano-XCT and tracked by 3+1D imaging at different stages of degradation. Porosity changes quantified by nano-XCT on the order of 40% from beginning-of-life to end-of-life with reduction in connected pore fraction were observed as well as increase in average pore size by 50%. The effect of changes at the nano-scale on diffusion properties were calculated and an empirical model is proposed for degraded catalyst layer structures where Knudsen effects are dominant.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/fuce.20160000810.1002/fuce.201600008 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00305-310.1016/S0017-9310(03)00305-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00603-010.1016/S0013-4686(03)00603-0 ↗
4. 10.1002/9780470974001.f30304610.1002/9780470974001.f303046 ↗
5. 10.2138/rmg.2015.80.0410.2138/rmg.2015.80.04 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-710.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-7 ↗
7. 10.1149/06501.0059ecst10.1149/06501.0059ecst ↗
8. 10.1149/2.0091707jes10.1149/2.0091707jes ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.016 ↗
10. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:3<258::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:3<258::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.019 ↗
12. 10.1111/jmi.1218210.1111/jmi.12182 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20110152510.1002/adfm.201101525 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms510510.1038/ncomms5105 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.7b0971610.1021/acsami.7b09716 ↗
16. 10.1039/c2cp42969a10.1039/c2cp42969a ↗
17. 3D Failure Analysis of PEM Fuel Cell Catalyst Layers Using Multi-Length Scale X-Ray Computed Tomography10.1149/MA2015-02/37/1357 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.001 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11666-017-0532-y10.1007/s11666-017-0532-y ↗
20. 10.1002/fuce.20160017610.1002/fuce.201600176 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.6b0884410.1021/acsami.6b08844 ↗
22. 10.1002/fuce.20130000810.1002/fuce.201300008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.09210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.092 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-018-38464-910.1038/s41598-018-38464-9 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.05810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.058 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.04910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.049 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0251806jes10.1149/2.0251806jes ↗
28. 10.1149/2.0451713jes10.1149/2.0451713jes ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.14410.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.144 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598-018-38464-910.1038/s41598-018-38464-9 ↗
31. 10.1017/S143192761701088110.1017/S1431927617010881 ↗
32. 10.1149/2.068203jes10.1149/2.068203jes ↗
33. 10.1021/am200590w10.1021/am200590w ↗
34. 10.1149/2.0321709jes10.1149/2.0321709jes ↗
35. 10.1149/2.061304jes10.1149/2.061304jes ↗
36. 10.1149/1.313996310.1149/1.3139963 ↗
37. 10.1149/2.0211514jes10.1149/2.0211514jes ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.11910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.119 ↗
39. 10.1149/2.036404jes10.1149/2.036404jes ↗
40. 10.1038/nphys176510.1038/nphys1765 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.04.02310.1016/j.ces.2016.04.023 ↗
42. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
43. 10.1149/06917.0591ecst10.1149/06917.0591ecst ↗
44. 10.1149/1.359655610.1149/1.3596556 ↗
45. 10.1109/ICCSP.2011.573930510.1109/ICCSP.2011.5739305 ↗
46. 10.1115/1.297104510.1115/1.2971045 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.08610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.086 ↗
48. 10.1149/2.0881702jes10.1149/2.0881702jes ↗
49. 10.1149/2.024309jes10.1149/2.024309jes ↗
50. 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.05.01110.1016/j.mtener.2018.05.011 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.026 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.070 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.08.01810.1016/j.elecom.2016.08.018 ↗
54. 10.1017/S143192760707443010.1017/S1431927607074430 ↗
55. Kok M. D. R. Tranter T. Lam M. Gostick J. T. , PoreSpy: An image analysis toolkit for voxel images of porous materials. J. Open Source Softw., (2018).
56. 10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.00210.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.10710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.107 ↗
58. 10.1149/2.1141409jes10.1149/2.1141409jes ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.034 ↗