Correlative X-ray Tomographic Imaging of Catalyst Layer Degradation in Fuel Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Effective catalyst layer design is vital for high-performing polymer electrolyte fuel cells. However, the desired catalyst layer structure may be compromised by operational degradation, causing performance decay. The present work investigates the multi-scale catalyst layer structure and properties across different stages of degradation, including liquid water distribution in an operating fuel cell. A correlative, multi-scale imaging workflow with a combined analysis by operando lab-based micro-X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and nano-XCT is developed for this purpose. From operando XCT results, the catalyst layer solid area fraction was found to gradually decrease by 25% with crack formation and severe localized corrosion accompanied by up to 50% thinning and significantly altered liquid water distribution. Localized degradation features such as nano-scale cracks and internal pore-size distribution changes were resolved using nano-XCT and tracked by 3+1D imaging at different stages of degradation. Porosity changes quantified by nano-XCT on the order of 40% from beginning-of-life to end-of-life with reduction in connected pore fraction were observed as well as increase in average pore size by 50%. The effect of changes at the nano-scale on diffusion properties were calculated and an empirical model is proposed for degraded catalyst layer structures where Knudsen effects are dominant.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/fuce.20160000810.1002/fuce.201600008 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00305-310.1016/S0017-9310(03)00305-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00603-010.1016/S0013-4686(03)00603-0 ↗
4. 10.1002/9780470974001.f30304610.1002/9780470974001.f303046 ↗
5. 10.2138/rmg.2015.80.0410.2138/rmg.2015.80.04 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-710.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-7 ↗
7. 10.1149/06501.0059ecst10.1149/06501.0059ecst ↗
8. 10.1149/2.0091707jes10.1149/2.0091707jes ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.016 ↗
10. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:3<258::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:3<258::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.019 ↗
12. 10.1111/jmi.1218210.1111/jmi.12182 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20110152510.1002/adfm.201101525 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms510510.1038/ncomms5105 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.7b0971610.1021/acsami.7b09716 ↗
16. 10.1039/c2cp42969a10.1039/c2cp42969a ↗
17. 3D Failure Analysis of PEM Fuel Cell Catalyst Layers Using Multi-Length Scale X-Ray Computed Tomography10.1149/MA2015-02/37/1357 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.001 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11666-017-0532-y10.1007/s11666-017-0532-y ↗
20. 10.1002/fuce.20160017610.1002/fuce.201600176 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.6b0884410.1021/acsami.6b08844 ↗
22. 10.1002/fuce.20130000810.1002/fuce.201300008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.09210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.092 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-018-38464-910.1038/s41598-018-38464-9 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.05810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.058 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.04910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.049 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0251806jes10.1149/2.0251806jes ↗
28. 10.1149/2.0451713jes10.1149/2.0451713jes ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.14410.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.144 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598-018-38464-910.1038/s41598-018-38464-9 ↗
31. 10.1017/S143192761701088110.1017/S1431927617010881 ↗
32. 10.1149/2.068203jes10.1149/2.068203jes ↗
33. 10.1021/am200590w10.1021/am200590w ↗
34. 10.1149/2.0321709jes10.1149/2.0321709jes ↗
35. 10.1149/2.061304jes10.1149/2.061304jes ↗
36. 10.1149/1.313996310.1149/1.3139963 ↗
37. 10.1149/2.0211514jes10.1149/2.0211514jes ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.11910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.119 ↗
39. 10.1149/2.036404jes10.1149/2.036404jes ↗
40. 10.1038/nphys176510.1038/nphys1765 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.04.02310.1016/j.ces.2016.04.023 ↗
42. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
43. 10.1149/06917.0591ecst10.1149/06917.0591ecst ↗
44. 10.1149/1.359655610.1149/1.3596556 ↗
45. 10.1109/ICCSP.2011.573930510.1109/ICCSP.2011.5739305 ↗
46. 10.1115/1.297104510.1115/1.2971045 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.08610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.086 ↗
48. 10.1149/2.0881702jes10.1149/2.0881702jes ↗
49. 10.1149/2.024309jes10.1149/2.024309jes ↗
50. 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.05.01110.1016/j.mtener.2018.05.011 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.026 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.070 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.08.01810.1016/j.elecom.2016.08.018 ↗
54. 10.1017/S143192760707443010.1017/S1431927607074430 ↗
55. Kok M. D. R. Tranter T. Lam M. Gostick J. T. , PoreSpy: An image analysis toolkit for voxel images of porous materials. J. Open Source Softw., (2018).
56. 10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.00210.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.10710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.107 ↗
58. 10.1149/2.1141409jes10.1149/2.1141409jes ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.034 ↗