Effect of Partial Cycling of NCA/Graphite Cylindrical Cells in Different SOC Intervals
Source abstract
Abstract
A quasi-realistic aging test of NCA/graphite lithium-ion 18650 cylindrical cells is performed during a long-term low c-rate cycling and using a new protocol for testing and studying the aging. This to emulate a characteristic charge/discharge profile of off-grid PV-battery systems. The cells were partially cycled at four different cut-off voltages and two state of charge ranges (ΔSOC) for 1000 and 700 cycles over 24 months. Differential voltage analysis shows that a combination of loss of active material (LAM) and loss of lithium inventory (LLI) are the causes of capacity loss. Cells cycled with high cut-off voltages and wide ΔSOC (20% to 95%) were severely affected by material degradation and electrode shift. High cut-off voltage and narrow ΔSOC (65% to 95%) caused greater electrode degradation but negligible cell unbalance. Cell impedance is observed to increase in both cells. Cells cycled with middle to low cut-off voltages and narrow ΔSOC (35%–65% and 20% to 50%) had comparable degradation rates to calendar-aged cells. Cycling NCA/graphite cells with low c-rate and high cut-off voltages will degrade the electrode in the same way high c-rate would do. However, low c-rate at low and middle cut-off voltages greatly decrease cell degradation compared to similar conditions at middle to high c-rate, therefore increasing battery lifetime.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Benavente · Appl. Energy · 2019 · 235 · 51910.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.084 ↗
2. Bourlot · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 684110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.103 ↗
3. Watanabe · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 260 · 5010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.103 ↗
4. Muto · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · 37110.1149/1.3076137 ↗
5. Abraham · Electrochim. Acta · 2005 · 51 · 50210.1016/j.electacta.2005.05.008 ↗
6. Watanabe · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 247 · 41210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.079 ↗
7. Bloom · J. Power Sources, · 2006 · 157 · 53710.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.07.054 ↗
8. Darcovich · Appl. Energy · 2013 · 111 · 85310.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.088 ↗
9. Mao · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 29 · 110.1002/adfm.201900247 ↗
10. Zhou · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2017 · 5 · 272410.1039/C6TA09921A ↗
11. Bloom · J. Pow. Sour. · 2010 · 195 · 87710.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.019 ↗
12. Watanabe · ECS Transactions · 2012 · 41 · 6510.1149/1.4717964 ↗
13. Watanabe · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 690610.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.028 ↗
14. Mohanty · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 110.1038/srep26532 ↗
15. Kalyani · Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 6 · 68910.1016/j.stam.2005.06.001 ↗
16. Du · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 1771310.1021/acsami.6b05629 ↗
17. Li · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 174 · 112210.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.099 ↗
18. Keil · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · 187210.1149/2.0411609jes ↗
19. Keil · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · 606610.1149/2.0091701jes ↗
20. Ryu · Chem. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 115510.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05269 ↗
21. Huang · Ceram. Int. · 2014 · 40 · 1322310.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.029 ↗
22. Zhao · Scientific. Net. · 2012 · 528 · 202
23. Smith · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · 210.1149/2.056206jes ↗
24. Li · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A268210.1149/2.0491811jes ↗
25. Harlow · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A303110.1149/2.0981913jes ↗
26. Benavente-Araoz · Energy Procedia · 2017 · 142 · 371510.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.266 ↗
27. Mussa · J. Energy Storage · 2017 · 13 · 32510.1016/j.est.2017.07.004 ↗
28. Eddahech · Electrochim. Acta · 2013 · 114 · 75010.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.101 ↗
29. Lewerenz · J. Energy Storage · 2019 · 21 · 68010.1016/j.est.2019.01.004 ↗
30. Watanabe · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 258 · 21010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.018 ↗
31. Birkl · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 341 · 37310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.011 ↗
32. Abraham · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 170 · 46510.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.071 ↗
33. Gantenbein · J. Power. Sources. · 2018 · 379 · 31710.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.043 ↗
34. Honkura · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 1014110.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.020 ↗
35. Stiaszny · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 258 · 6110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.019 ↗
36. Dubarry · J. Power. Sources. · 2009 · 194 · 54110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.05.036 ↗
37. Liu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 15710.1149/1.3294790 ↗
38. Dubarry · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 258 · 40810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.052 ↗
39. Safari · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · A112310.1149/1.3614529 ↗
40. Dubarry · J. of Power Sources · 2012 · 219 · 20410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.016 ↗
41. Han · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 268 · 65810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.111 ↗
42. Sarasketa-Zabala · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 89610.1021/jp510071d ↗
43. Pastor-fern · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 360 · 30110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.042 ↗
44. Honkura · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 264 · 14010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.036 ↗
45. Svens · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 270 · 13110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.050 ↗
46. Kleiner · J. Power. Sources. · 2015 · 273 · 7010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.133 ↗
47. Shim · J. Power. Sources. · 2003 · 122 · 18810.1016/S0378-7753(03)00351-3 ↗
48. Zhang · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2017 · 12 · 110.1186/s11671-016-1773-2 ↗
49. Xiao · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 110.1038/s41598-017-01657-9 ↗
50. Vetter · J. Power. Sources. · 2005 · 147 · 110.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 ↗
51. Lang · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 326 · 39710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.010 ↗