journal article·2019

Facile Synthesis of In Situ Graphitic-N Doped Porous Carbon Derived from Ginkgo Leaf for Fast Capacitive Deionization

Zhengzheng Xie, Xiaohong Shang, Kaibing Xu, Jianmao Yang, Bin Hu, Pengfei Nie, Wenwen Jiang, Jianyun Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

The ginkgo leaf-derived graphitic-N-doped porous carbon was fabricated by one-step carbonization in the presence of KOH agent. The morphology, surface functional groups, element state and porous structure of the obtained carbon were investigated systematically. Compared with the carbon samples by ginkgo-leaf carbonization and KOH post-activation (two-step), the one-step activated porous carbon exhibits high graphitic-N content and good electric conductivity. The conductive-agent-free carbon sheet was made successfully and the resultant carbon electrode possesses good conductivity and excellent electrochemical properties, with the specific capacitance of 176.1 F g −1 . When being applied for capacitive deionization, the desalination amount of the electrode arrived at 16.5 mg g −1 . Meanwhile, the salt adsorption rate is very rapid, with the average salt adsorption rate reaching 1.5 mg g −1 min −1 . This work provides an easy and environmentally benign route for the synthesis of the conductive carbon from natural raw materials for highly efficient capacitive deionization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c5ee00519a10.1039/c5ee00519a ↗
2. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.005 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.desal.2013.08.01710.1016/j.desal.2013.08.017 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.05810.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.058 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.01710.1016/j.energy.2014.09.017 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.05010.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.050 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.7b0271210.1021/acsami.7b02712 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.00110.1016/j.desal.2017.04.001 ↗
9. 10.1039/C8TA04058C10.1039/C8TA04058C ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.08410.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.084 ↗
11. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0088410.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00884 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.02510.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.025 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.00110.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.04910.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.049 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.07110.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.071 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.03610.1016/j.desal.2017.11.036 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.desal.2017.09.02610.1016/j.desal.2017.09.026 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.08.00510.1016/j.desal.2007.08.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.08910.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.089 ↗
20. Highly mesoporous activated carbon electrode for capacitive deionization10.1016/j.seppur.2012.10.041 ↗
21. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0175010.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01750 ↗
22. 10.1039/c2nr31154b10.1039/c2nr31154b ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.10010.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.100 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.flatc.2018.01.00210.1016/j.flatc.2018.01.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.00410.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.004 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20170108210.1002/aenm.201701082 ↗
27. 10.1039.C8TA06184J10.1039.C8TA06184J ↗
28. 10.1007/s11581-018-2478-610.1007/s11581-018-2478-6 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl203103710.1021/nl2031037 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20160410310.1002/adma.201604103 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.03680810.1103/PhysRevLett.101.036808 ↗
32. 10.1039/c1jm10845j10.1039/c1jm10845j ↗
33. 10.1126/science.116804910.1126/science.1168049 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20170160110.1002/aenm.201701601 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.005 ↗
36. 10.1039/C4CP05995F10.1039/C4CP05995F ↗
37. 10.1039/c3cc45641b10.1039/c3cc45641b ↗
38. 10.1039/C6TA11057F10.1039/C6TA11057F ↗
39. 10.1149/2.1391712jes10.1149/2.1391712jes ↗
40. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.03710.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.037 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.11.00110.1016/j.matlet.2017.11.001 ↗
42. 10.1039/C6RA26039J10.1039/C6RA26039J ↗
43. 10.1080/21663831.2016.125083410.1080/21663831.2016.1250834 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.10410.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.104 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0162910.1021/acs.est.7b01629 ↗
46. 10.1002/adfm.20160574510.1002/adfm.201605745 ↗
47. 10.1039/c0ee00347f10.1039/c0ee00347f ↗
48. 10.1002/jctb.566310.1002/jctb.5663 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.00910.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.009 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.00710.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.007 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.03010.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.030 ↗
52. 10.1039/C8TA04409K10.1039/C8TA04409K ↗
53. Meilia D. Khunur M. Misbah Setianingsih T. , “Effect of metal cation ratio on chemical properties of ZnFe2O4/AC composite and adsorption of organic contaminant,” 299, 012036 (2018).10.1088/1757-899X/299/1/012036 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.10810.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.108 ↗
55. 10.1126/science.121913410.1126/science.1219134 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.11110.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.111 ↗
57. Mei-Lin W. U. Zhou C. S. Chen L. S. Zhong S. A. Fang-Fang G. U. , “Study on the Extraction of Total Flavonoids From Ginkgo Leaves by Enzyme Hydrolysis,” Natural Product Research & Development, (2004).
58. 10.1002/ejlt.20080029910.1002/ejlt.200800299 ↗
59. 10.1039/C2EE21166A10.1039/C2EE21166A ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.06910.1016/j.cej.2017.11.069 ↗
61. 10.1039/C7TA00339K10.1039/C7TA00339K ↗
62. 10.1039/C7TA00339K10.1039/C7TA00339K ↗
63. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.03710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.037 ↗
64. 10.1039/b813846j10.1039/b813846j ↗
65. 10.1039/b618139m10.1039/b618139m ↗
66. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.11.16110.1016/j.snb.2017.11.161 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.08010.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.080 ↗
68. 10.1021/ja511539a10.1021/ja511539a ↗
69. 10.1038/nenergy.2015.610.1038/nenergy.2015.6 ↗
70. 10.1021/acsami.8b0656810.1021/acsami.8b06568 ↗
71. 10.1039/C8TA01128A10.1039/C8TA01128A ↗
72. 10.1038/srep1122510.1038/srep11225 ↗