journal article·2021-04-01Open access

Achieving 5,000-h and 8,000-h Low-PGM Electrode Durability on Automotive Drive Cycles

R. K. Ahluwalia, X. Wang, J-K Peng, V. Konduru, S. Arisetty, N. Ramaswamy, S. Kumaraguru

Abstract

Whereas total Pt loading in anode and cathode catalysts below 0.125 mg cm−2 is required to meet the stringent cost target for automotive fuel cell systems (FCS) for light duty vehicles, low-loaded cathode catalysts are susceptible to unacceptable aging-related performance losses at high current densities. A framework model, validated by accelerated stress test data, has identified cell voltage, relative humidity (RH) and temperature as the key operating variables that affect degradation of a high-activity d-PtCo/C cathode catalyst with 0.1 mg cm−2 Pt loading. Drive cycle simulations indicate that these can be controlled by properly selecting the minimum FCS power, compressor-expander module (CEM) turndown, and stack coolant temperature. The optimum system parameters are 4-kWe minimum power for an 80-kWe FCS, CEM turndown of 12.5, and 66 °C average coolant exit temperature that combine to limit the maximum cell voltage to 850 mV and outlet RH to 90%–100%. Depending on Pt loading, the mismatch between actual and allowable degradation for 10% power loss over 5,000-h lifetime requires the stack to be oversized by 2.4%–5%, resulting in 8.4%–41% lower Pt utilization and 7.1%–20.5% penalty in stack cost. The corresponding results for 8,000-h lifetime are 10.3%-14% stack oversizing, 23%–51.8% lower Pt utilization, and 24.1%–35.4% stack cost penalty.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Direct hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle cost analysis: system and high-volume manufacturing description, validation, and outlook10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.100 ↗
2. Fuel cells program area plenary presentation
3. Fuel cell system modeling and analysis
4. FC-PAD: fuel cell performance and durability consortium10.2172/1505949 ↗
5. Technology assessment of a fuel cell vehicle: 2017 Toyota Mirai,’ ANL/ESD-18/12
6. Strategic Analysis, Inc, 2017Mass production cost estimation of direct H2 PEM fuel cell systems for transportation applications10.13140/RG.2.2.36532.55683 ↗
7. , ‘The impact of platinum loading on oxygen transport resistance10.1149/2.061212jes ↗
8. The priority and challenge of high-power performance of low platinum proton-exchange membrane fuel cells10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
9. Impact of platinum loading and catalyst layer structure on PEMFC performance10.1149/2.072308jes ↗
10. Platinum-alloy cathode catalyst degradation in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: nanometer-scale compositional and morphological changes10.1149/1.3258275 ↗
11. Impact of platinum loading on performance and degradation of polymer electrolyte fuel cell electrodes studied in a rainbow stack10.1002/fuce.201700099 ↗
12. Current progress and performance improvement of Pt/C catalysts for fuel cells10.1039/D0TA08312G ↗
13. Mesoporous platinum prepared by electrodeposition for ultralow loading proton exchange membrane fuel cells10.1038/s41598-019-38855-6 ↗
14. Carbon support microstructure impact on high current density transport resistances in PEMFC cathode10.1149/1945-7111/ab819c ↗
15. Enhancement of service life of polymer electrolyte fuel cells through application of nanodispersed ionomer10.1126/sciadv.aaw0870 ↗
16. Systems strategies to mitigate carbon corrosion in fuel cells10.1149/1.2356198 ↗
17. Durability of Low-PGM electrodes under automotive drive cycles10.1149/MA2020-02362343mtgabs ↗
18. Measurement of catalyst layer electrolyte resistance in PEFCs using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy10.1149/1.1888367 ↗
19. Recent advances in catalyst accelerated stress tests for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells10.1149/2.0881807jes ↗
20. Measurement of oxygen transport resistance in PEM fuel cells by limiting current methods10.1149/1.3152226 ↗
21. A semi- empirical catalyst degradation model based on voltage cycling under automotive operating conditions in PEM fuel cells10.1149/2.0641902jes ↗
22. Voltage cycling induced losses in electrochemically active surface area and in H2/air-performance of PEM fuel cells10.1149/2.0561606jes ↗
23. The impact of potential cycling on PEMFC Durability10.1149/2.083308jes ↗
24. Dissolution of platinum: limits for the deployment of electrochemical energy conversion10.1002/anie.201207256 ↗
25. The effect of humidity and oxygen partial pressure on degradation of Pt/C catalyst in PEM fuel cell10.1016/j.electacta.2008.10.008 ↗
26. Temeprature effects on PEM fuel cells Pt/C catalyst degradation10.1149/1.2819680 ↗
27. Rapid self-start of polymer electrolyte fuel cells from subfreezing temperatures10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.071 ↗
28. Long-term stability of nanostructured thin film electrodes at operating potentials10.1149/2.0881704jes ↗
29. Performance of advanced automotive fuel cell systems with heat rejection constraint10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.060 ↗
30. Cathode catalyst utilization for the ORR in a PEMFC10.1149/1.2400626 ↗
31. Performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cell electrodes with atomically dispersed (AD) Fe-C-N ORR catalyst10.1149/2.0851914jes ↗
32. Potential dependence of Pt and Co dissolution from platinum-cobalt alloy PEFC catalysts using time-resolved measurements10.1149/2.0031806jes ↗
33. GCtool for fuel cell systems design and analysis: user documentation
34. Islam · 201810.2172/1463258 ↗
35. High-current density durability of Pt/C and PtCo/C catalysts at similar particle sizes in PEMFCs10.1149/1945-7111/abe5ea ↗