journal article·2020-01-06Open access

Investigating Liquid Water Transport in Different Pore Structure of Gas Diffusion Layers for PEMFC Using Lattice Boltzmann Method

M. Sepe, P. Satjaritanun, S. Hirano, I. V. Zenyuk, N. Tippayawong, S. Shimpalee

Abstract

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) require a gas diffusion layer (GDL) to aid in the transport of liquid fuel to the catalyst layer. In this work, direct modeling using the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) was applied to X-ray CT scans of four different carbon gas diffusion layers to understand the mass transport properties through the samples. Three injection orientations were used to study local saturation levels, water evolution through the sample, and mass transport behavior at breakthrough conditions. The LBM, combined with computational fluid dynamic modeling techniques, can accurately predict liquid saturation at the macro and micro scale, which provides more insight into the mass transport phenomena through the GDL. The change of pore structure and orientation in both the in-plane and through-plane determines the path that liquid water must take, which could aid or impact PEMFC performance. The outcomes from this work will also benefit any research that needs knowledge of internal mass transport qualities of gas diffusion media.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Bazylak · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 163 · 78410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.045 ↗
2. Satjaritanun · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · 111510.1149/2.0201814jes ↗
3. Fazeli · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · 66110.1149/2.0191507jes ↗
4. Nam · Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. · 2003 · 46 · 459510.1016/S0017-9310(03)00305-3 ↗
5. Lee · Electrochim. Acta · 2009 · 54 · 116610.1016/j.electacta.2008.08.068 ↗
6. Flückiger · Electrochim. Acta · 2011 · 56 · 225410.1016/j.electacta.2010.12.016 ↗
7. Deevanhxay · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2011 · 36 · 1090110.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.160 ↗
8. Cetinbas · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F300110.1149/2.0011907jes ↗
9. García-Salaberri · Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer · 2018 · 127 · 68710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.07.030 ↗
10. García-Salaberri · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 295 · 86110.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.089 ↗
11. Shimpalee · Electrochemica Acta · 2009 · 54 · 289910.1016/j.electacta.2008.11.008 ↗
12. Shimpalee · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 160 · 39810.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.099 ↗
13. Shimpalee · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2007 · 32 · 84210.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.032 ↗
14. Jeon · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2008 · 33 · 105210.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.11.015 ↗
15. Shimpalee · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2011 · 3610.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.146 ↗
16. Shimpalee · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 167 · 13010.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.004 ↗
17. Shimpalee · Electrochim. Acta · 2007 · 52 · 674810.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.115 ↗
18. Shimpalee · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 163 · 48010.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.038 ↗
19. Shimpalee · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 161 · E313810.1149/2.015408jes ↗
20. Lilavivat · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 174 · 125310.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.081 ↗
21. Shimpalee · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 222 · 121010.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.095 ↗
22. You · Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer · 2002 · 45 · 227710.1016/S0017-9310(01)00322-2 ↗
23. Yoon · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 118 · 19310.1016/S0378-7753(03)00093-4 ↗
24. Büchi · J. Power Sources · 2005 · 145 · 6210.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.039 ↗
25. Pasaogullari · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A39910.1149/1.1646148 ↗
26. Jiang · Electrochim. Acta · 2007 · 53 · 61010.1016/j.electacta.2007.07.032 ↗
27. Meng · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 171 · 73810.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.029 ↗
28. Phillips · J. Power Sources · 2008 · 180 · 30910.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.089 ↗
29. Wang · Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer · 2011 · 54 · 237510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.02.024 ↗
30. Yesilyurt · J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 910.1115/1.4005626 ↗
31. Dadda · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 38 · 709210.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.142 ↗
32. Wang · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 153 · 13010.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.207 ↗
33. Hao · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · F74410.1149/2.1461607jes ↗
34. Jeon · J. Energy Inst. · 2019 · 92 · 75510.1016/j.joei.2018.02.007 ↗
35. Jeon · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 294 · 39310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.080 ↗
36. Jeon · J. Power Sources · 2019 · 423 · 28010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.079 ↗
37. Satjaritanun · ECS Trans. · 2017 · 80 · 18710.1149/08008.0187ecst ↗
38. Satjaritanun · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · E335910.1149/2.0391711jes ↗
39. Satjaritanun · Chem. Eng. Res. Des. · 2018 · 130 · 6310.1016/j.cherd.2017.12.010 ↗
40. Satjaritanun · ECS Trans. · 2019 · 92 · 3910.1149/09208.0039ecst ↗
41. Satjaritanun · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/2.0162001JES ↗
42. Zenyuk · J. Phys. Chem. · 2016 · 120 · 2870110.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10658 ↗
43. Rueden · BMC Bioinf. · 2017 · 18 · 52910.1186/s12859-017-1934-z ↗
44. Zenyuk · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 328 · 36410.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.020 ↗
45. Schindelin · Nat. Methods · 2012 · 9 · 67610.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗