Electrochemical Method for Studying Localized Corrosion beneath Disbonded Coatings under Cathodic Protection
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a new method for measuring localized corrosion under disbonded coatings by means of an electrochemical sensor, denoted differential aeration sensor (DAS). It measures the distribution of electrochemical currents over an electrode array surface partially covered by a crevice that simulates a disbonded coating. The DAS has been evaluated using immersion tests at open circuit and under cathodic protection (CP) conditions. Under both conditions, anodic as well as cathodic current densities were detected within the crevice. A fundamental understanding for the detection of anodic currents under CP has been explained in terms of basic electrochemistry. Based on the current distribution data provided by the sensor, two different analysis methods have been used to estimate corrosion and its distribution. These methods consisted of a direct application of Faraday's Law to the anodic currents detected by the array, and on a sensor-specific method denoted ' corrected currents' method. It has been demonstrated that under diffusion controlled conditions this latter method produces a better corrosion estimation than the direct application of Faraday's Law. The 'corrected currents' method allowed the estimation of corrosion patterns outside the crevice under CP. Good correlation between electrochemical calculations and surface profilometry results has been obtained.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Pikas J. L. , Case histories of external microbiologically influenced corrosion underneath disbonded coatings, in CORROSION/96, p. 198/1, NACE, Denver, CO (1996).10.5006/C1996-96198 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1350-6307(01)00032-210.1016/S1350-6307(01)00032-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.00810.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.02410.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.024 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.00210.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.002 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.11.01410.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.11.014 ↗
7. 10.1016/0033-0655(83)80002-810.1016/0033-0655(83)80002-8 ↗
8. Cherry · Mater. Perform. · 1990 · 29 · 22
9. Jack · Mater. Perform. · 1994 · 33 · 17
10. 10.5006/1.329348110.5006/1.3293481 ↗
11. 10.5006/1.328398310.5006/1.3283983 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0010-938X(99)00136-510.1016/S0010-938X(99)00136-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00103-710.1016/S0010-938X(00)00103-7 ↗
14. 10.5006/1.329038710.5006/1.3290387 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00042-710.1016/S0010-938X(01)00042-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.01.00410.1016/j.corsci.2008.01.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.05.02410.1016/j.corsci.2007.05.024 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.02710.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.027 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.07.02510.1016/j.corsci.2010.07.025 ↗
20. 10.5006/1.336091110.5006/1.3360911 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.03.01710.1016/j.corsci.2011.03.017 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.10.01310.1016/j.corsci.2011.10.013 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.02.00710.1016/j.jlp.2014.02.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.04.00310.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.04.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tust.2011.10.01110.1016/j.tust.2011.10.011 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.02.07610.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.02.076 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.snb.2006.02.02910.1016/j.snb.2006.02.029 ↗
28. 10.5006/1.329031910.5006/1.3290319 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.03210.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.032 ↗
30. Jankowski · Corros. Rev. · 2002 · 20 · 15910.1515/CORRREV.2002.20.3.159 ↗
31. Jankowski · Corros. Rev. · 2002 · 20 · 17910.1515/CORRREV.2002.20.3.179 ↗
32. 10.5006/1.328058110.5006/1.3280581 ↗
33. 10.5006/0010-9312-29.10.40610.5006/0010-9312-29.10.406 ↗
34. 10.5006/081910.5006/0819 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.08.02410.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.08.024 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00190-610.1016/S0010-938X(00)00190-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00191-810.1016/S0010-938X(00)00191-8 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00192-X10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00192-X ↗
39. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.01.01810.1016/j.corsci.2011.01.018 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.03.00210.1016/j.corsci.2009.03.002 ↗
41. 10.1002/maco.20100603510.1002/maco.201006035 ↗
42. 10.5006/1.328078910.5006/1.3280789 ↗
43. Varela F. Tan Y. J. Forsyth M. , A Novel Approach for Monitoring Pipeline Corrosion under Disbonded Coatings, in 10th International Pipeline Conference, p. 1, Calgary, Canada (2014).10.1115/IPC2014-33097 ↗
44. Varela F. Tan Y. J. Forsyth M. , Monitoring Cathodic Shielding and Corrosion under Disbonded Coatings in 19th International Corrosion Congress, p. 1, Jeju, Korea (2014).10.1115/IPC2014-33097 ↗
45. Varela F. Tan Y. J. Forsyth M. Hinton B. , Corrosion Monitoring under Disbonded Coatings, in 54th Annual Conference of the Australasian Corrosion Association, Darwin, Australia (2014).
46. 10.1149/2.0091501eel10.1149/2.0091501eel ↗
47. G1-03, “Standard practice for preparing, cleaning, and evaluating corrosion test specimens” (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2011).
48. Stears C. D. Degerstedt R. M. Moghissi O. C. Bone L. III , Field program on the use of coupons to monitor cathodic protection of an underground pipeline, in Corrosion 97, p. 1, NACE international, New Orleans, Louisiana (1997).10.5006/C1997-97564 ↗
49. NACE SP0104, “The use of coupons for cathodic protection monitoring applications” (Houston, TX: NACE International, 2014).