Mitigated Start-Up of PEMFC in Real Automotive Conditions: Local Experimental Investigation and Development of a New Accelerated Stress Test Protocol
Source abstract
Abstract
This study combines local electrochemical diagnostics with ex situ analysis to investigate degradation mechanism associated to start-up/shut-down (SU/SD) of PEMFC and mitigation strategies adopted in automotive stacks. Local degradation resulting from repeated SU/SD was analyzed with and without mitigation strategies by means of a macro-segmented cell setup provided with Reference Hydrogen Electrodes (RHEs) at both anode and cathode to measure local electrodes potential and current. Accelerated Stress Test (AST) for start-up with and without mitigation strategies are proposed and validated. A ten-fold acceleration of performance loss due to un-mitigated SU/SD has been calculated with respect to AST for catalyst support. Under mitigated SU/SD, instead, a strong degradation was observed as localized at cathode inlet region (i.e. −38% ECSA loss and −22 mV voltage loss after 200 cycles) due to local potentials transient reaching up to 1.5 V vs RHE. These localized stress conditions were additionally reproduced in a zero-gradient and a new AST protocol (named start-up AST) was proposed to mimic the potential profile observed upon SU/SD cycling. Representativeness of the start-up AST for real world degradation was confirmed up to 200 cycles. Platinum dissolution and diffusion/precipitation within the polymer electrolyte was shown to be the dominant mechanism affecting performance loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Hydrogen: the next wave for electric vehicles?
2. A future for hydrogen in European transportation10.1038/s41929-020-0438-9 ↗
3. New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z ↗
4. Nygaard · 2015
5. Zhang · Appl. Energy · 2018 · 223 · 24910.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.049 ↗
6. Reiser · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2005 · 8 · A27310.1149/1.1896466 ↗
7. Lamibrac · Energy Procedia · 2012 · 29 · 31810.1016/j.egypro.2012.09.038 ↗
8. Gaumont · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2017 · 42 · 180010.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.035 ↗
9. Macauley · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F314810.1149/2.0061806jes ↗
10. Shen · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 189 · 111410.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.075 ↗
11. Dillet · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 250 · 6810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.141 ↗
12. Durst · Appl. Catal. B Environ. · 2013 · 138–139 · 41610.1016/j.apcatb.2013.03.021 ↗
13. Mittermeier · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · F12710.1149/2.1061702jes ↗
14. Mittermeier · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F134910.1149/2.0931816jes ↗
15. Yu · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 205 · 1010.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.059 ↗
16. Homogenous gas in shut down fuel cells
17. Fuel Cell Voltage Control
18. Oyarce · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 254 · 23210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.058 ↗
19. Jo · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 990610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.035 ↗
20. Yuan · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 910710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.082 ↗
21. Bloom · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 243 · 45110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.026 ↗
22. Bednarek · Data Br. · 2020 · 3110.1016/j.dib.2020.105945 ↗
23. Bednarek · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 47310.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228319 ↗
24. Rabissi · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 404 · 13510.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.094 ↗
25. Rabissi · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 397 · 36110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.034 ↗
26. Piela · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 651210.1021/jp067669y ↗
27. Brightman · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 267 · 16010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.040 ↗
28. Rabissi · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2018 · 43 · 979710.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.043 ↗
29. Mench · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · A7910.1149/1.1526108 ↗
30. Noponen · J. Power Sources · 2002 · 106 · 30410.1016/S0378-7753(01)01063-1 ↗
31. Wieser · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 2000 · 30 · 80310.1023/A:1004047412066 ↗
32. Geiger · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A39410.1149/1.1646147 ↗
33. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers10.1016/j.nima.2009.01.145 ↗
34. Cleghorn · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 1998 · 28 · 66310.1023/A:1003206513954 ↗
35. Tsotridis · 201510.2790/54653 ↗
36. Roy · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2007 · 154 · B88310.1149/1.2747533 ↗
37. Gasteiger · Appl. Catal. B Environ. · 2005 · 56 · 910.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 ↗
38. 2016
39. Neyerlin · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2006 · 15310.1149/1.2266294 ↗
40. Harzer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F311810.1149/2.0161806jes ↗
41. Baker · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B99110.1149/1.3152226 ↗
42. Baker · ECS Trans. · 2006 · 3 · 98910.1149/1.2356218 ↗
43. Greszler · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · F83110.1149/2.061212jes ↗
44. Rice · Metrologia · 2013 · 50 · 66310.1088/0026-1394/50/6/663 ↗
45. Colombo · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · 2021 · 1 · 110.1149/1945-7111/abf4eb ↗
46. Lamibrac · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 945110.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.013 ↗
47. Vilekar · J. Power Sources · 2010 · 195 · 224110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.023 ↗
48. Cheng · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 1010.1002/aenm.202000623 ↗
49. Yu · ECS Trans. · 2006 · 3 · 79710.1149/1.2356199 ↗
50. Mittermeier · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · F12710.1149/2.1061702jes ↗
51. Maranzana · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · F69410.1149/2.0451507jes ↗
52. Springer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1996 · 143 · 58710.1149/1.1836485 ↗
53. Schwämmlein · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F131210.1149/2.0611816jes ↗
54. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2007 · 111 · 4910.1021/jp076104 ↗
55. Gould · 2011
56. Sethuraman · Electrochim. Acta · 2010 · 55 · 568310.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.004 ↗
57. Zhang · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 296 · 32710.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.063 ↗
58. Greszler · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · F83110.1149/2.061212jes ↗
59. Kneer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F324110.1149/2.0271806jes ↗
60. Myers · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F317810.1149/2.0211806jes ↗
61. Weber · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 1720710.1039/C4TA02952F ↗
62. Yu · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 247 · 115510.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.093 ↗
63. Yu · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 247 · 116910.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.145 ↗
64. Borup · Chem. Rev. · 2007 · 107 · 390410.1021/cr050182l ↗
65. Borup · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 163 · 7610.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.009 ↗
66. Sanchez · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 352 · 4210.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.057 ↗
67. Sanchez · ECS Trans. · 2014 · 64 · 60310.1149/06403.0603ecst ↗