journal article·2021-05-01

Proficient Sanitary Wastewater Treatment in Laboratory and Field-Scale Microbial Fuel Cell with Anti-Biofouling Cu 0.5 Mn 0.5 Fe 2 O 4 as Cathode Catalyst

Indrasis Das, Sovik Das, Swati Das, M. M. Ghangrekar

Publisher page

Abstract

For successful field-scale application of microbial fuel cell (MFC), the power recovery from field-scale MFC needs to be improved considerably with simultaneous reduction in its fabrication cost. These problems can be addressed by applying low-cost and efficient cathode catalyst in MFCs. In this regard, Cu 0.5 Mn 0.5 Fe 2 O 4 (CuMnFe) was synthesized and applied as cathode catalyst in lab and field-scale MFCs with capacity of 150 ml and 25 l, respectively. Lab-scale MFC having CuMnFe as cathode catalyst demonstrated power density of 176.0 ± 8.2 mW m −2 , which was competitive with MFC having Pt as cathode catalyst (183.0 ± 12.6 mW m −2 ) and it was about seven times higher than control MFC (25.5 ± 4.5 mW m −2 ) having no catalyst. Application of CuMnFe as cathode catalyst in field-scale MFC produced power density of 7.74 mW m −2 , which was three-times higher than the power produced by the field-scale MFC operated without any cathode catalyst (2.58 mW m −2 ). The cathode catalyst CuMnFe also demonstrated excellent anti-biofouling properties, which in turn improved the power production of field-scale MFC. Therefore, low-cost CuMnFe can be anticipated as an efficacious cathode catalyst for application in MFCs that would produce long term stable higher power, while offering simultaneous treatment to wastewater.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Bodík · Environ. Prot. Eng. · 2013 · 39 · 1510.5277/EPE130202 ↗
2. Logan · 2007 · 1
3. Sonu · Int. J. Environ. Stud. · 2020 · 77 · 69210.1080/00207233.2020.1736438 ↗
4. Türk · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2018 · 43 · 2302710.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.143 ↗
5. Das · J. Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact. Waste · 2020 · 2410.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000501 ↗
6. Behera · Bioresour. Technol. · 2010 · 101 · 118310.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.089 ↗
7. Das · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 75110.1016/j.cplett.2020.137536 ↗
8. Jadhav · J. Water Process Eng. · 2020 · 3810.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101566 ↗
9. Jaouen · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 162310.1021/am900219g ↗
10. Noori · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2016 · 41 · 363810.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.163 ↗
11. Das · J. Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact. Waste · 2020 · 2410.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000498 ↗
12. Hiegemann · Bioresour. Technol. · 2019 · 29410.1016/j.biortech.2019.122227 ↗
13. Rossi · Water Res. · 2019 · 148 · 5110.1016/j.watres.2018.10.022 ↗
14. Rossi · Bioresour. Technol. · 2018 · 265 · 20010.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.008 ↗
15. Kumar · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 2357110.1039/C6RA03598A ↗
16. Gadkari · Chem. Eng. J. · 2020 · 38810.1016/j.cej.2020.124176 ↗
17. Noori · Bioresour. Technol. · 2016 · 220 · 18310.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.061 ↗
18. Das · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2018 · 43 · 1919610.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.113 ↗
19. Das · J. Hazardous, Toxic Radioact. Waste · 2020 · 24 · 110.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000518 ↗
20. Khilari · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 2065710.1021/acsami.5b05273 ↗
21. Zhu · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 294710.1021/nl401325u ↗
22. Pelletier · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2009 · 10 · 320910.3390/ijms10073209 ↗
23. Faungnawakij · Appl. Catal. B Environ. · 2007 · 74 · 14410.1016/j.apcatb.2007.02.010 ↗
24. Ghadge · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 166 · 32010.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.105 ↗
25. Das · Ionics (Kiel). · 2020 · 26 · 306110.1007/s11581-020-03472-1 ↗
26. Das · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 45 · 1678710.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.157 ↗
27. Das · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 351210.1021/acsaem.0c00054 ↗
28. Das · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · G14610.1149/2.0781813jes ↗
29. Das · J. Environ. Chem. Eng. · 2020 · 810.1016/j.jece.2020.104028 ↗
30. Das · Bioresour. Technol. · 2019 · 29410.1016/j.biortech.2019.122138 ↗
31. Bhowmick · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2018 · 43 · 750110.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.188 ↗
32. Ghadge · Bioresour. Technol. · 2015 · 182 · 37310.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.115 ↗
33. APHA, AWWA, and WEF · 1998
34. Logan · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 40 · 518110.1021/es0605016 ↗
35. Bhowmick · Electrochim. Acta · 2019 · 310 · 17310.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.127 ↗
36. Noori · Environ. Technol. · 2018 · 41 · 120910.1080/09593330.2018.1526216 ↗
37. Yang · Chemosphere · 2020 · 24710.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125780 ↗
38. Bhowmick · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2019 · 44 · 2221810.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.063 ↗
39. Touach · Particuology · 2017 · 34 · 14710.1016/j.partic.2017.02.006 ↗
40. Garino · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 463310.1021/acsami.5b11198 ↗
41. Mahmoud · Bioresour. Technol. · 2011 · 102 · 1045910.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.123 ↗
42. Huang · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 232 · 33910.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.163 ↗
43. Liu · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 359 · 35510.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.080 ↗
44. Smibert · 1994 · 607