Full Homogenized Macroscale Model and Pseudo-2-Dimensional Model for Lithium-Ion Battery Dynamics: Comparative Analysis, Experimental Verification and Sensitivity Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Control-oriented models based on electrochemistry have conventionally been evaluated and designed from the Doyle-Fuller-Newman (DFN) macroscale model. However, the DFN model is susceptible in predicting battery response under certain operating conditions since it is an approximate representation of pore-scale dynamics. This work shows the limitations of the DFN model in predicting voltage response at high temperatures of cell operation. A full homogenized macroscale (FHM) model, developed in previous research, is shown to overcome these limitations. Results indicate that the predictability of the DFN model deteriorates when trying to predict the voltage response at low state of charge for high temperature of operation under 1 C-rate discharge. The influence of parameters on the model states and output is investigated as a means to address parameter identifiability issues, for which, we formulate and resolve sensitivity functions for the partial differential equations (PDEs) of the FHM model. Results show that parameter identifiability is dependent on the battery state of charge.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.00910.1016/j.rser.2015.12.009 ↗
2. 10.3390/en1009131410.3390/en10091314 ↗
3. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1310.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.183613210.1149/1.1836132 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
6. 10.1038/456436a10.1038/456436a ↗
7. 10.1149/1.312965610.1149/1.3129656 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.275407210.1149/1.2754072 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11242-011-9738-510.1007/s11242-011-9738-5 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.jes11322410.1149/2.jes113224 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.097403jes10.1149/2.097403jes ↗
12. 10.1149/1.277612810.1149/1.2776128 ↗
13. 10.1155/2013/26874710.1155/2013/268747 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.306508310.1149/1.3065083 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.02510.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.025 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.07510.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.075 ↗
17. 10.1109/TCST.2011.217860410.1109/TCST.2011.2178604 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.08410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.084 ↗
19. 10.1109/CDC.2018.861979310.1109/CDC.2018.8619793 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0771509jes10.1149/2.0771509jes ↗
21. Khalil H. K. , Nonlinear Systems, 3rd Edition, New Jersey, Prentice Hall (2002).
22. Perez H. Moura S. J. , “Sensitivity-Based Interval PDE Observer for Battery SOC Estimation,” in Proceedings of the 2015 American Control Conference, pp. 323-328, IEEE (2015).10.1109/ACC.2015.7170756 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.034 ↗
24. Arunachalam H. Korneev S. Battiato I. Onori S. , “Multiscale modeling approach to determine effective lithium-ion transport properties,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 92-97, IEEE, (2017).10.23919/ACC.2017.7962936 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.187273710.1149/1.1872737 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20130127810.1002/aenm.201301278 ↗
27. Plett G. L. , Battery Management Systems, Volume I: Battery Modeling, Artech House, (2015).
28. Arunachalam H. , “A New Multiscale Modeling Framework for Lithium-Ion Battery Dynamics: Theory, Experiments, and Comparative Study with the Doyle-Fuller-Newman Model”. PhD thesis, Clemson University, (2017).
29. Sony Energy Devices Corporation, “Lithium Ion Rechargeable Battery Technical Information”. https://www.powerstream.com/p/us18650vtc4.pdf, (2012)
30. Ebbesen S. Kiwitz P. Guzzella L. , “A generic particle swarm optimization matlab function,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 1519-1524, IEEE, (2012).10.1109/ACC.2012.6314697 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.03110.1016/j.energy.2014.12.031 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.05.04010.1016/j.enconman.2013.05.040 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.00910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.009 ↗
34. 10.1149/2.0861608jes10.1149/2.0861608jes ↗
35. 10.1149/2.002208jes10.1149/2.002208jes ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.11910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.119 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.6b1632110.1021/acsami.6b16321 ↗
38. 10.1002/aenm.20150130910.1002/aenm.201501309 ↗
39. 10.1149/2.0981813jes10.1149/2.0981813jes ↗
40. 10.1149/2.0731814jes10.1149/2.0731814jes ↗
41. 10.1149/1.155378810.1149/1.1553788 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.047304jes10.1149/2.047304jes ↗
43. 10.1149/1.245558510.1149/1.2455585 ↗