journal article·2018Open access

Fuel Cell Performance Implications of Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication with Platinum-Nickel Nanowire Catalysts

Scott A. Mauger, K. C. Neyerlin, Shaun M. Alia, Chilan Ngo, Siddharth Komini Babu, Katherine E. Hurst, Svitlana Pylypenko, Shawn Litster, Bryan S. Pivovar

Abstract

Platinum-nickel nanowire (PtNiNW) catalysts have shown exceptionally high oxygen reduction mass activity in rotating disk electrode measurements. However, the ability to successfully incorporate PtNiNWs into high performance membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) has been challenging due to their size, shape, density, dispersion characteristics, and corrosion-susceptible nickel core. We have investigated the impact of specific processing steps and electrode composition on observed fuel cell performance and electrochemical properties in order to optimize performance. We have found that nickel ion contamination is a major concern for PtNiNWs that can be addressed through ion exchange in fabricated/tested MEAs or by acid leaching of catalyst materials prior to MEA incorporation, with the latter being the more successful method. Additionally, decreased ionomer incorporation has led to the highest performance demonstrating 238 mA/mg Pt (0.9 V IR-free) for PtNiNWs (pre-leached to 80 wt% Pt) with 9 wt% ionomer incorporation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/am900600y10.1021/am900600y ↗
2. 10.1149/2.072308jes10.1149/2.072308jes ↗
3. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01045-X10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01045-X ↗
4. 10.1149/1.321071710.1149/1.3210717 ↗
5. 10.1149/05002.1475ecst10.1149/05002.1475ecst ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.01510.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.015 ↗
7. Parsonage E. E. Debe M. K. , US Pat. Office, 5,338,430 (1994).
8. Debe M. K. , U.S. D.O.E. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Program 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, FC17 (2009).
9. 10.1149/1.359574710.1149/1.3595747 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.359574810.1149/1.3595748 ↗
11. 10.1016/0013-4686(78)85025-710.1016/0013-4686(78)85025-7 ↗
12. 10.1021/jp056050d10.1021/jp056050d ↗
13. 10.1039/C4CY00736K10.1039/C4CY00736K ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.033 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.073 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.00310.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.003 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.222928410.1149/1.2229284 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.12.00110.1016/j.electacta.2008.12.001 ↗
19. 10.1149/1.161366910.1149/1.1613669 ↗
20. 10.1021/cr050182l10.1021/cr050182l ↗
21. 10.1149/1.363560510.1149/1.3635605 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.205486610.1149/1.2054866 ↗
23. 10.1149/1.204859010.1149/1.2048590 ↗
24. 10.1021/j100013a03210.1021/j100013a032 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp013442l10.1021/jp013442l ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.03510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.035 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja060047610.1021/ja0600476 ↗
28. 10.1038/nmat184010.1038/nmat1840 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp807143e10.1021/jp807143e ↗
30. 10.1039/C4EE02144D10.1039/C4EE02144D ↗
31. 10.1021/cs501537n10.1021/cs501537n ↗
32. 10.1021/jp306107t10.1021/jp306107t ↗
33. Adzic R. R. , U.S. D.O.E. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Program 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, FC009 (2014).
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.006 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.elecom.2004.05.02810.1016/j.elecom.2004.05.028 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.06410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.064 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0005410.1021/acsomega.7b00054 ↗
38. 10.1149/06917.0291ecst10.1149/06917.0291ecst ↗
39. 10.1021/cs401081w10.1021/cs401081w ↗
40. Pivovar B. S. , U.S. D.O.E. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Program 2016 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, FC142 (2016).10.1016/S1464-2859(16)30189-4 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0021610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
42. Pivovar B. S. , U.S. D.O.E. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Program 2017 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, FC142 (2017).
43. Rapaport P. A. Blowers A. J. James L. Lakshmanan B. , U.S. Pattent Office, 9099703 (2015).
44. 10.1149/1.235621810.1149/1.2356218 ↗
45. 10.1149/2.0881704jes10.1149/2.0881704jes ↗
46. Greszler T. A. Moylan T. E. Gasteiger H. A. , in Handbook of Fuel Cells, 2nd ed, Veilstich W. Gasteiger H. A. Lamm A. Yokokawa H. , Editors, p. B631, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK (2010).
47. 10.1149/08008.0283ecst10.1149/08008.0283ecst ↗
48. Steinbach A. J. , U.S. D.O.E. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Program 2017 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation (2017).
49. 10.1149/2.061212jes10.1149/2.061212jes ↗
50. Neyerlin K. C. , Insights from Electrochemical Diagnostics Pertaining to the Support Dependent Performance of Pt-based Catalysts at High Current Density, In preparation (2018).
51. 10.1021/ac202231y10.1021/ac202231y ↗
52. 10.1149/05801.0831ecst10.1149/05801.0831ecst ↗
53. 10.1149/1.354603810.1149/1.3546038 ↗
54. 10.1002/adfm.20130431110.1002/adfm.201304311 ↗
55. 10.1039/C4TA02952F10.1039/C4TA02952F ↗