journal article·2015Open access

A High-Throughput Approach Developing Lithium-Niobium-Tantalum Oxides as Electrolyte/Cathode Interlayers for High-Voltage All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Chihiro Yada, Christopher E. Lee, David Laughman, Louise Hannah, Hideki Iba, Brian E. Hayden

Abstract

The ever-increasing interest in sustainable mobility is driving the development of innovative batteries with increased energy densities relative to currently commercialized lithium-ion batteries. All-solid-state batteries using 5 V-class positive electrodes are one of those batteries due to their larger volumetric energy density and their superior durability. However, their power density tends to be limited by the large charge transfer resistance at their electrolyte/5 V-electrode interfaces; one explanation for this is the development of significant Li + deficient layers at the interface. Here we propose a new interlayer material that would effectively resolve the Li + deficient layers. The partially-crystallized Li 56 Nb 22 Ta 22 oxide was identified using the molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) based high-throughput physical vapor deposition (HT-PVD) approach. Its higher ionic conductivity of 4.2 μS cm −1 and higher permittivity of 165 when measured at 254 kHz, relative to those of conventional LiNbO 3 interlayer (1.8 μS cm −1 and 95, respectively) will be effective for fast charge transfer reactions at the electrolyte /cathode interfaces in 5 V-class all-solid-state batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Iba H. Yada C. , 17th International Meeting on Lithium Batteries, invited presentation (2014).
2. 10.1365/s35658-014-0421-910.1365/s35658-014-0421-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.03410.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.034 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.161998710.1149/1.1619987 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.22310.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.223 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.05410.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.054 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20130141610.1002/aenm.201301416 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.09010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.090 ↗
9. 10.1039/c0jm04366d10.1039/c0jm04366d ↗
10. 10.1016/0022-3697(85)90172-610.1016/0022-3697(85)90172-6 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20050260410.1002/adma.200502604 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20090731910.1002/anie.200907319 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.04.01310.1016/j.elecom.2012.04.013 ↗
14. 10.1021/cm501695910.1021/cm5016959 ↗
15. Braun S. Latz A. Yada C. , 17th International Meeting on Lithium Batteries, Abstract 660, (2014).10.1149/MA2014-04/4/660 ↗
16. 10.1002/aenm.20140140810.1002/aenm.201401408 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.02.00810.1016/j.elecom.2007.02.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.01710.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.017 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.32550910.1063/1.325509 ↗
20. 10.1080/0731517050041663710.1080/07315170500416637 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.237-240.101610.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.237-240.1016 ↗
22. 10.1021/cc050117p10.1021/cc050117p ↗
23. 10.1021/co100075f10.1021/co100075f ↗
24. Barsoukov E. Ross MacDonald J. , in Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment and Applications, 2nd Ed., Wiley (2005).10.1002/0471716243 ↗