Rate-Dependent Aging Resulting from Fast Charging of Li-Ion Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The mass electrification of personal and service vehicles is reliant on the ability of battery packs to undergo extreme fast recharging. A central challenge is that the repeated exposure to high currents can trigger and/or accelerate mechanisms of performance degradation, such as lithium deposition, mechanical damage of active material particles, and impedance rise. Here, we investigate whether constraining high-rate charging to limited state-of-charge (SOC) ranges can mitigate these aging processes. Our experiments map the boundaries of lithium plating conditions, and also indicate that permanent losses of electrode capacity appear to be a function of cycle number, but not charging rate. Interestingly, we show that impedance rise appears to depend on charging rate alone, and not on the amount of charge passed at each cycle. This observation suggests that limiting fast charging to a narrow SOC range would only delay cell aging, but not fully prevent it from happening. We identify oxide-particle cracking as the likely mechanism for this impedance rise, suggesting that particle and electrode design are essential to enable fast charging. The findings of this work can inform the development of fast-charging protocols that are less damaging to cell health.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Lessons learned on early electric vehicle fast-charging deployments
2. Mussa · J. Power Sources · 2019 · 422 · 17510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.095 ↗
3. Lajunen · J. Clean. Prod. · 2018 · 172 · 5610.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.066 ↗
4. Rodrigues · Nat. Energy · 2017 · 2 · 1710810.1038/nenergy.2017.108 ↗
5. Keyser · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 367 · 22810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.009 ↗
6. Tomaszewska · eTransportation · 2019 · 1 · 10001110.1016/j.etran.2019.100011 ↗
7. Xu · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2019 · 129 · 16010.1016/j.jmps.2019.05.003 ↗
8. Xia · Nano Energy · 2018 · 53 · 75310.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.051 ↗
9. Hendricks · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 297 · 11310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.100 ↗
10. Liu · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 345210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00379 ↗
11. Tanim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A192610.1149/2.0731910jes ↗
12. Sethuraman · J. Power Sources · 2010 · 195 · 365510.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.034 ↗
13. Hein · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 201 · 35410.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.220 ↗
14. Ng · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 365310.1021/acsaem.0c00130 ↗
15. Fleischhammer · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 274 · 43210.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.135 ↗
16. Mistry · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 09054210.1149/1945-7111/ab8fd7 ↗
17. Schindler · Journal of Energy Storage · 2018 · 19 · 36410.1016/j.est.2018.08.002 ↗
18. Yao · Energy & Environmental Science · 2019 · 12 · 65610.1039/C8EE02373E ↗
19. Keil · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A390810.1149/2.1271915jes ↗
20. Klett · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 257 · 12610.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.105 ↗
21. Bach · Journal of Energy Storage · 2016 · 5 · 21210.1016/j.est.2016.01.003 ↗
22. Ecker · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 248 · 83910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143 ↗
23. Schuster · Journal of Energy Storage · 2015 · 1 · 4410.1016/j.est.2015.05.003 ↗
24. Lang · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 326 · 39710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.010 ↗
25. Ahmed · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 367 · 25010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.055 ↗
26. Rodrigues · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A169710.1149/2.0611809jes ↗
27. Benavente-Araoz · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 04052910.1149/1945-7111/ab78fd ↗
28. Rodrigues · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A99610.1149/2.0401906jes ↗
29. Sarasketa-Zabala · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2015 · 119 · 89610.1021/jp510071d ↗
30. Gilbert · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A38910.1149/2.1111702jes ↗
31. Gilbert · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 164 · A605410.1149/2.0081701jes ↗
32. Jung · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A136110.1149/2.0021707jes ↗
33. Fonseca Rodrigues · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 87310.1021/acsaem.8b01975 ↗
34. Abraham · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 170 · 46510.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.071 ↗
35. Rodrigues · J. Phys.: Energy · 2020 · 2 · 02400210.1088/2515-7655/ab6b3a ↗
36. Waldmann · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 384 · 10710.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.063 ↗
37. Shkrob · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A330510.1149/2.0561914jes ↗
38. Qiao · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 360 · 29410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.009 ↗
39. Tornheim · Nano Energy · 2019 · 55 · 21610.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.065 ↗
40. Yan · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1410110.1038/ncomms14101 ↗
41. Miller · Advanced Energy Materials · 2013 · 3 · 109810.1002/aenm.201300015 ↗
42. Abraham · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · A145010.1149/1.1613291 ↗
43. Andersson · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · A135810.1149/1.1505636 ↗
44. Weber · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A299210.1149/2.0441713jes ↗
45. Li · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 102 · 29410.1016/S0378-7753(01)00821-7 ↗
46. Mai · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 08051710.1149/1945-7111/ab8c84 ↗