journal article·2020-01-08Open access

Modeling the Performance of A Flow-Through Gas Diffusion Electrode for Electrochemical Reduction of CO or CO 2

Yikai Chen, Nathan S. Lewis, Chengxiang Xiang

Abstract

A flow-through gas diffusion electrode (GDE) consisting of agglomerate catalysts for CO or CO 2 reduction, gas channels for reactants, aqueous electrolytes for ionic transport, and metallic current collectors was simulated and evaluated using a numerical model. The geometric partial current densities and Faradaic Efficiencies (FE) for CH 4 , C 2 H 4 and H 2 generation in GDEs were calculated and compared to the behavior of analogous aqueous-based planar electrodes. The pH-dependent kinetics for CH 4 and C 2 H 4 generation were used to represent the intrinsic catalytic characteristics for the agglomerate catalyst. The modeling indicated that relative to planar electrodes for either CO reduction (COR) or CO 2 reduction (CO 2 R), substantial increases in electrochemical reduction rates and Faradaic efficiencies are expected when flow-through GDEs are used. The spatially resolved pH and reaction rates within the flow-through GDEs were also simulated for two different operating pHs, and the resulting transport losses were analyzed quantitatively. For CO 2 reduction, substantial loss of CO 2 via chemical reaction with the locally alkaline electrolyte was observed due to the increased pH in operating GDEs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Advanced battery technologies research · Ionic liquids properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Hori · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1997 · 101 · 707510.1021/jp970284i ↗
2. Feng · ACS Central Sci · 2016 · 2 · 16910.1021/acscentsci.6b00022 ↗
3. Li · Nature · 2014 · 508 · 50410.1038/nature13249 ↗
4. Verdaguer-Casadevall · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 980810.1021/jacs.5b06227 ↗
5. Bard · 2000
6. Dinh · Science · 2018 · 360 · 78310.1126/science.aas9100 ↗
7. Jouny · Nat. Catal. · 2018 · 1 · 74810.1038/s41929-018-0133-2 ↗
8. Ma · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 301 · 21910.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.124 ↗
9. Hoang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 579110.1021/jacs.8b01868 ↗
10. Prakash · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 223 · 6810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.036 ↗
11. Ripatti · Joule · 2019 · 3 · 24010.1016/j.joule.2018.10.007 ↗
12. Cook · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1990 · 137 · 60710.1149/1.2086515 ↗
13. Han · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 85510.1021/acsenergylett.8b00164 ↗
14. Zhuang · Nat. Catal. · 2018 · 1 · 42110.1038/s41929-018-0084-7 ↗
15. Ogura · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2005 · 152 · D21310.1149/1.2073115 ↗
16. Yano · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2002 · 519 · 9310.1016/S0022-0728(01)00729-X ↗
17. Weng · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1697310.1039/C8CP01319E ↗
18. Weng · Energ Environ Sci · 2019 · 12 · 195010.1039/C9EE00909D ↗
19. Kim · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 312 · 19210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.043 ↗
20. Whipple · Electrochem Solid St · 2010 · 13 · D10910.1149/1.3456590 ↗
21. De Luna · Nat. Catal. · 2018 · 1 · 10310.1038/s41929-017-0018-9 ↗
22. Kopljar · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 2014 · 44 · 110710.1007/s10800-014-0731-x ↗
23. Han · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 85510.1021/acsenergylett.8b00164 ↗
24. Thiele · Ind. Eng. Chem. · 1939 · 31 · 91610.1021/ie50355a027 ↗
25. Janssen · Journal of Applied Electrochemistry · 1987 · 17 · 117710.1007/BF01023601 ↗
26. Rumble · 2019
27. Vayenas · 2008 · 8910.1007/978-0-387-49489-0 ↗
28. Nitopi · Chem. Rev. · 2019 · 119 · 761010.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 ↗
29. Kuhl · Energy & Environmental Science · 2012 · 5 · 705010.1039/C2EE21234J ↗
30. Kortlever · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2015 · 6 · 407310.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01559 ↗
31. Wang · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 744510.1021/acscatal.8b01200 ↗
32. Kuhl · Energ Environ Sci · 2012 · 5 · 705010.1039/c2ee21234j ↗