Highly Durable, Cost-Effective, and Multifunctional Carbon-Supported IrRu-Based Catalyst for Automotive Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Anodes
Source abstract
Abstract
The design of highly durable, electroactive, and cost-effective catalysts to replace the currently prevalent Pt-based ones has long been a major milestone for expanding the market penetration of fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs). Over the past decades, catalyst degradation in automotive fuel cells under transient conditions (e.g., startup/shutdown and cell reversal) has attracted much attention due to its irreversible consequences for the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). Herein, we evaluate IrRu n /C as alternative catalysts to increase MEA anode durability under cell reversal conditions and investigate their suitability for use in FCEVs. Among the various Ir:Ru ratios, the best hydrogen oxidation activity was observed for Ir:Ru = 1:4 (mol/mol), as confirmed by rotating disk electrode measurements. The performances of IrRu 4 /C and Pt/C as anode catalysts were compared side by side, with the corresponding I - V and anode polarization tests carried out under various operating conditions (cell temperature, relative humidity, and backpressure). Importantly, IrRu 4 /C showed Pt-comparable (∼100%) MEA performance and hydrogen oxidation activity, additionally exhibiting a ∼120 times better durability under cell reversal conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.03.03010.1016/j.apcatb.2009.03.030 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.03510.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.035 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.12.01410.1016/j.cattod.2013.12.014 ↗
4. 10.1039/C5TA01362C10.1039/C5TA01362C ↗
5. 10.1149/06917.0067ecst10.1149/06917.0067ecst ↗
6. Atanasoski R. T. Vernstrom G. D. Haugen G. M. Watschke T. M. Wheldon J. M. Hendricks S. M. Atanasoska L. L. Hesteret A. E. , FY 2011 Annual Progress Report of DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, V.D.3 (2011).
7. 10.3390/catal612019710.3390/catal6120197 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.059 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.235619910.1149/1.2356199 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.105 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.014 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.08510.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.085 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.07210.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.072 ↗
14. 10.1149/2.006303eel10.1149/2.006303eel ↗
15. Min M. Kong N.-W. You E. Kim T.-Y. Pak C. , ECS Meeting Abstracts, MA2014-02 1072 (2014).10.1149/MA2014-02/21/1072 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.00210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.002 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0731714jes10.1149/2.0731714jes ↗
18. 10.1149/1.221454510.1149/1.2214545 ↗
19. Cost calculations based on the past five years’ base material price (Pt, Ir, Ru) obtained from http://www.platinum.matthey.com/ (2012–2017).
20. Bard A. J. Faulkner L. R. , Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed., p. 341, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2001).
21. Jin S. A. Pak C. Yoo D. J. Lee K. H. , US 2013/0137009 A1, (2013).
22. 10.1007/s12678-012-0092-310.1007/s12678-012-0092-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.06810.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.068 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp075937210.1021/jp0759372 ↗
25. 10.1021/j100020a06310.1021/j100020a063 ↗