journal article·2012

Ionic Resistance of a Cathode Catalyst Layer with Various Thicknesses by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy for PEMFC

Ju Wan Lim, Yong-Hun Cho, Minjeh Ahn, Dong Young Chung, Yoon-Hwan Cho, Namgee Jung, Yun Sik Kang, Ok-Hee Kim, Myeong Jae Lee, Minhyoung Kim, Yung-Eun Sung

Publisher page

Abstract

Ionic resistance and double layer capacitance of catalyst layer (CL) variations with the thickness of the cathode CL were estimated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) using the modified transmission-line model (TLM). 0.1–0.4 mg Pt cm −2 of commercial 20, 40, and 60 wt% Pt/C catalysts were used to control cathode CL thicknesses. The catalyst with a low Pt to C ratio was favorable for maximum power density when the catalyst loaded was ≤0.2 mg Pt cm −2 , and the catalyst with a high Pt to C ratio was favorable when catalyst loading was ≥0.3 mg Pt cm −2 . The electrochemical surface areas of 20, 40, and 60 wt% Pt/C were different, whereas the Pt utilization of these catalysts was similar. Modified TLM under the non-faradaic condition was used for an easy estimate of the ionic resistance and double layer capacitance of the CL. Moreover cell inductance, electrolyte resistance, and the charge transfer resistance of crossovered H 2 were used for a precise estimate. The ionic resistances and double layer capacitances of the CL were linearly proportional to CL thickness regardless of the Pt to C ratio.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.12.03510.1016/j.ssi.2008.12.035 ↗
2. 10.1038/nchem.36710.1038/nchem.367 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.200648710.1149/1.2006487 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.17510.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.175 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.09610.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.096 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.033 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00128-510.1016/S0013-4686(98)00128-5 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.139080410.1149/1.1390804 ↗
9. de Levie · 1967 · 6 · 329
10. 10.1149/1.335523310.1149/1.3355233 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.318792810.1149/1.3187928 ↗
12. 10.1149/1.361098810.1149/1.3610988 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.314396510.1149/1.3143965 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.08110.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.081 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0022-0728(98)00214-910.1016/S0022-0728(98)00214-9 ↗
16. 10.1134/S102319350902009810.1134/S1023193509020098 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.07210.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.072 ↗
18. Macdonald J. R. , Impedance Spectroscopy Emphasizing Solid Materials and Systems, p. 60, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1987).
19. 10.1149/1.183648510.1149/1.1836485 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.351924610.1149/1.3519246 ↗
21. 10.1021/j100886a03410.1021/j100886a034 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.01510.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.015 ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20080174210.1002/smll.200801742 ↗
24. 10.1149/1.183638110.1149/1.1836381 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.164757210.1149/1.1647572 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.206946910.1149/1.2069469 ↗
27. 10.1016/0008-6223(73)90080-810.1016/0008-6223(73)90080-8 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.208597110.1149/1.2085971 ↗