Power Output and Durability of Electrospun Fuel Cell Fiber Cathodes with PVDF and Nafion/PVDF Binders
Source abstract
Abstract
Membrane-electrode-assemblies (MEAs) with electrospun nanofiber mat electrodes (0.10 mg/cm 2 Pt loading) and a Nafion 211 membrane were prepared and tested in a H 2 /air fuel cell at 100% and 40% relative humidity. The cathode binder was either neat poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) or a Nafion/PVDF blend (20 to 80 wt% Nafion) and the anode binder was Nafion with poly(acrylic acid). Polarization curves were recorded at 80°C and ambient pressure before, intermittently, and after a carbon corrosion voltage cycling experiment. The Nafion/PVDF cathode MEA with the smallest amount of PVDF (80/20 Nafion/PVDF weight ratio) produced the highest maximum power at beginning-of-life (BoL), 545 mW/cm 2 at 100% RH, which was 35% greater than that for a conventional MEA with a neat Nafion binder. Carbon corrosion scaled inversely with cathode PVDF content, with a 33/67 Nafion/PVDF cathode binder MEA producing the highest end-of-life (EoL) power (330 mW/cm 2 ). MEAs with < 50 wt% PVDF in the cathode binder exhibited a power density decline during carbon corrosion, whereas the power increased during/after carbon corrosion for nanofiber cathodes with binders containing > 50 wt% PVDF due to favorable increases in the hydrophilicity of the carbon support and Pt mass activity, coupled with a lower carbon loss.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.05510.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.055 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.02110.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 ↗
3. 10.1002/cssc.20110024510.1002/cssc.201100245 ↗
4. 10.1149/2.008308jes10.1149/2.008308jes ↗
5. 10.1149/2.0651501jes10.1149/2.0651501jes ↗
6. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.08210.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.082 ↗
7. 10.1149/1.313996310.1149/1.3139963 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.189646610.1149/1.1896466 ↗
9. 10.1016/B978-0-12-386936-4.10003-X10.1016/B978-0-12-386936-4.10003-X ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.131966311110.1073/pnas.1319663111 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.05.00810.1016/j.apcatb.2013.05.008 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.01510.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.04310.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.043 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.033 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.02810.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.028 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.10710.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.107 ↗
17. 10.1021/ma000636a10.1021/ma000636a ↗
18. Wycisk · Meeting Abstracts · 2014 · MA2014–02 · 119910.1149/MA2014-02/21/1199 ↗
19. 10.1149/1.356164510.1149/1.3561645 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.363561110.1149/1.3635611 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.01710.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.017 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.07710.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.077 ↗
23. 10.1149/1.198435110.1149/1.1984351 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.01.02210.1016/j.ssi.2010.01.022 ↗
25. 10.1002/polb.2237510.1002/polb.22375 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:101846952056210.1023/A:1018469520562 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.363560510.1149/1.3635605 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.359074810.1149/1.3590748 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.02510.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.025 ↗
30. 10.1021/la036369u10.1021/la036369u ↗
31. 10.1149/1.363560810.1149/1.3635608 ↗
32. 10.1002/fuce.20100018010.1002/fuce.201000180 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.05310.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.053 ↗
34. 10.1149/2.019212jes10.1149/2.019212jes ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.11.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.11.008 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.298197910.1149/1.2981979 ↗