Influence of LiPF6on the Aluminum Current Collector Dissolution in High Voltage Lithium Ion Batteries after Long-Term Charge/Discharge Experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
The long-term influence of the most commonly used conducting salt in electrolyte formulations, lithium hexafluorophosphate, on the aluminum current collector stability in high voltage lithium ion batteries was investigated. By means of different surface sensitive techniques (scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy), after 1003 simulated charge/discharge cycles, anodic aluminum dissolution was found to take place at elevated potential (4.95 V vs. Li/Li + ) but only to a minor extent. Pitting of the Al collector could be assessed in the nanometer range. Furthermore, it could be revealed that local pit formation is related to local "native" grooves on the aluminum foil, which develop during the production process of the aluminum foil. The obtained results were evaluated and compared to a reference electrolyte containing the alternative conducting salt lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide. Our findings imply two possible mechanisms for the occurring Al dissolution behavior at elevated potentials. Either, an accelerated aluminum dissolution process, or a continuous passivation/LiPF 6 -decomposition process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5TA00361J10.1039/C5TA00361J ↗
2. 10.1351/pac19987003060310.1351/pac199870030603 ↗
3. 10.1002/ciuz.1999033060310.1002/ciuz.19990330603 ↗
4. Besenhard J. O. , Handbook of battery materials, Wiley: Weinheim, 1999.10.1002/9783527611676 ↗
5. 10.1149/2.022304jes10.1149/2.022304jes ↗
6. 10.1039/C5CP07718D10.1039/C5CP07718D ↗
7. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2014.04.00310.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2014.04.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2014.04.00110.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2014.04.001 ↗
9. 10.1039/c0jm04353b10.1039/c0jm04353b ↗
10. 10.1149/2.063308jes10.1149/2.063308jes ↗
11. 10.1149/2.004205eel10.1149/2.004205eel ↗
12. Brox S. Röser S. Streipert B. Hildebrand S. Rodehorst U. Qi X. Wagner R. Winter M. Cekic-Laskovic I. , ChemElectroChem 2016, n/a.
13. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00166-010.1016/S0378-7753(02)00166-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02700-610.1016/S0378-7753(97)02700-6 ↗
15. 10.1002/cssc.20160036910.1002/cssc.201600369 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02517-210.1016/S0378-7753(97)02517-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00110-610.1016/S0378-7753(02)00110-6 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.221881610.1149/1.2218816 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0094810.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00948 ↗
20. Meister P. Qi X. Kloepsch R. Krämer E. Streipert B. Winter M. Placke T. , ChemSusChem 2017, n/a.
21. 10.1016/S1293-2558(02)00026-210.1016/S1293-2558(02)00026-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.040 ↗
23. 10.1149/2.060404jes10.1149/2.060404jes ↗
24. 10.1016/j.aca.2011.11.05610.1016/j.aca.2011.11.056 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.16810.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.168 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.009309jes10.1149/2.009309jes ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0289510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02895 ↗
28. Winter · Prog. Batt. Batt. Mater. · 1998 · 17 · 208
29. 10.1149/1.183738610.1149/1.1837386 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00631-010.1016/S0378-7753(01)00631-0 ↗
31. 10.1149/2.0401503jes10.1149/2.0401503jes ↗
32. 10.1149/2.0461614jes10.1149/2.0461614jes ↗
33. 10.1149/1.274232110.1149/1.2742321 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 ↗
35. 10.1021/ja312241y10.1021/ja312241y ↗
36. 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.11.01410.1016/j.elecom.2013.11.014 ↗
37. 10.1002/ange.1996108213510.1002/ange.19961082135 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00141-X10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00141-X ↗
39. 10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00164-010.1016/S0013-4686(02)00164-0 ↗