Effect of Temperature and Relative Humidity on the Impedance Degradation of Dust-Contaminated Electronics
Source abstract
Abstract
One of the critical failure modes caused by dust contamination in electronics is surface insulation resistance degradation, or impedance degradation. Impedance degradation can lead to intermittent or permanent failure of PCB assemblies. In this study, two outdoor natural dust samples were collected from the field. We experimentally demonstrated that natural dust can cause impedance degradation under controlled temperature (20°C to 60°C) and relative humidity (50% to 95%) conditions. Critical transition ranges of relative humidity for the two dust samples were determined. Below the starting point of the transition range, the impedance was constant. Above the starting point of the range, the impedance degraded by orders of magnitude. The value of the critical transition range decreased with an increase in dust deposition density. Significant impedance degradation was observed as the temperature was raised from 20°C to 50°C. For each 10°C increase of temperature, the impedance dropped by approximately one order of magnitude. The failure mechanisms behind the impedance degradation processes associated with dust are discussed. Critical relative humidity of mixed salts, percentage of deliquescent substance, deposition density, and moisture sorption capacity were found to be key factors of dust that determine the effect of dust on impedance degradation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/RAMS.2003.118204210.1109/RAMS.2003.1182042 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.05510.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.055 ↗
3. Bell Communications Research Inc., Generic Requirements GR-63-CORE, “Network Equipment-Building System (NEBS) Requirements: Physical Protection”, Piscataway, NJ, Mar. 2006.
4. Intel Information Technology, “Reducing Data Center Cost with an Air Economizer”, IT@Intel Brief; Computer Manufacturing; Energy Efficiency; Aug. 2008.
5. 10.1109/ISSCC.2005.149399010.1109/ISSCC.2005.1493990 ↗
6. ASHRAE, “Particulate and Gaseous Contamination in Datacom Environments”, Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-conditioning Engineers, Inc., 2009.
7. ASHRAE whitepaper, “Gaseous and Particulate Contamination Guidelines for Data Centers”, Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-conditioning Engineers, Inc., http://www.eni.com/green-data-center/it_IT/static/pdf/ASHRAE_2.pdf.
8. IPC Handbook, “Surface Insulation Resistance Handbook”, IPC-9201, Northbrook, IL, July 1990.
9. Lin X. Y. Zhang J. G. , “Dust Corrosion”, 50th IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, 2004.
10. 10.1109/33.10513710.1109/33.105137 ↗
11. Wan J. W. Gao J. C. Lin X. Y. Zhang J. G. , “Water-Soluble Salts in Dust and Their Effects on Electric Contact Surfaces”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Contacts, Electromechanical Components and Their Applications, Jun., 1999, 37-42.
12. Leygraf C. Graedel T. E. , “Atmospheric corrosion”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., EISBN 0-471-37219-6, 2000.
13. Tegehall P. E. , “Impact of Humidity and Contamination on Surface Insulation Resistance and Electrochemical Migration”, IVF Industrial Research and Development Corporation, http://www.europeanleadfree.net/.
14. 10.1109/33.295910.1109/33.2959 ↗
15. International Electro-technical Commission, “IEC Standard 68-2-60 (Second Edition) Environmental Testing Part 2: Flowing Mixed Gas Corrosion Test,” Dec. 1995.
16. Electronic Industries Alliance, “EIA Standard TP-65A: Mixed Flowing Gas,” Jan. 1998.
17. Bellcore , “Information Management Services Generic Requirements for Separable Electrical Connector Used in Telecommunication Hardware,” Bellcore TR-NWT-001217, issue 1, Sep. 1992.
18. 10.1016/0960-1686(90)90018-I10.1016/0960-1686(90)90018-I ↗
19. 10.1109/ECTC.1992.20423610.1109/ECTC.1992.204236 ↗
20. Chan H. A. , “Surface insulation resistance methodology for today's manufacturing technology,” Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part C, IEEE Transactions on”, Volume: 19, Issue: 4, 1996, pp. 300–306.10.1109/3476.558559 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:100663591738110.1023/A:1006635917381 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.300556310.1149/1.3005563 ↗
23. Electrochemical Migration Resistance Test. Northbrook, IL: IPC, Sept. 2000, IPC Publication IPC-TM-650, Method 2.6.14.1.
24. Orazem M. E. Tribollet B. , Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2008.10.1002/9780470381588 ↗
25. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Section 6, 91st Edition.
26. Sinclair J. D. , “The relevance of particle contamination to corrosion of electronics in processing and field environments”, Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Corr. and Reliability of Electronic Materials and Devices, pp. 325–335, 1992.
27. Comizzoli R. B. Jankoski C. A. Peins G. A. Psota-Kelty L. A. Siconolfi D. J. Sinclair J. D. , “Reliability of Electronics in Harsh Environments: Electrical Leakage and Corrosion Caused by Hygroscopic Pollutant Particles”, in Corrosion and Reliability of Electronic Materials and Devices, Comizzoli R. B. Frankenthal R. P. Sinclair J. D. , Eds., PV 99-29, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Pennington, NJ, 1999.
28. Kucera V. Mattson E. , “Atmospheric Corrosion,” in Corrosion Mechanisms, Mansfeld F. (ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987.
29. 10.1149/1.222099710.1149/1.2220997 ↗
30. Tang Munkelwitz , “Composition and temperature dependence of the deliquescence properties of hygroscopic aerosols”, Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, 199310.1016/0960-1686(93)90204-C ↗
31. IPC Association Connecting Electronics Industries Handbook, “Guidelines for Design, Selection and Application of Conformal Coatings”, IPC-HDBK-830, 2002.
32. 10.1109/6144.99117710.1109/6144.991177 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cis.2011.08.00310.1016/j.cis.2011.08.003 ↗
34. 10.1149/1.208583810.1149/1.2085838 ↗