Elucidating the Role of Ionomer in the Performance of Platinum Group Metal-free Catalyst Layer via in situ Electrochemical Diagnostics
Source abstract
Abstract
The ionomer content in platinum group metal (PGM)-free polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) cathode catalyst layer (CCL) plays an important role in the electrode gas transport properties, proton conductivity, and hence, membrane electrode assembly (MEA) performance. In this work, the ionomer content in the CCL is varied, influencing electrode microstructure by altering porosity, tortuosity, as well as ionomer distribution and coverage of the catalyst particles. A novel technique consisting of a H2 pump, combined with a Pt black sensor layer, is used to measure the bulk mass transport resistance of a series of PGM-free CCL prepared with different ionomer contents. The values for bulk electrode mass transport resistance are contrasted with electrode proton transport resistance in the cathode catalyst layer, establishing a clearly defined trade-off between two key performance limiting phenomena and identifying a need for novel PGM-free electrode fabrication strategies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Baker · 2011
2. Vignarooban · Chinese J. Catal. · 2015 · 36 · 45810.1016/S1872-2067(14)60175-3 ↗
3. Banham · ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 62910.1021/acsenergylett.6b00644 ↗
4. Thompson · Nature Catalysis · 2019 · 7 · 55810.1038/s41929-019-0291-x ↗
5. 2018
6. Nguyen · Energy Conversation and Management · 2019 · 20010.1016/j.enconman.2019.112108 ↗
7. Thiel · Transportation Research Part (Part A) · 2014 · 63 · 2510.1016/j.tra.2014.02.018 ↗
8. Jaouen · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 11410.1039/C0EE00011F ↗
9. Chen · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 316710.1039/c0ee00558d ↗
10. Martinez · Adv. Mater. · 201910.1002/adma.201806545 ↗
11. Li · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2018 · 9 · 19810.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.039 ↗
12. Wu · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2013 · 46 · 187810.1021/ar400011z ↗
13. Gewirth · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 231310.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00335 ↗
14. Osmieri · ChemEngineering · 2019 · 3 · 1610.3390/chemengineering3010016 ↗
15. Shao · Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 116 · 359410.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 ↗
16. Yin · ECS Trans. · 2017 · 77 · 127310.1149/07711.1273ecst ↗
17. Osmieri · Appl. Catal. B Environ. · 2017 · 201 · 25310.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.043 ↗
18. Komini Babu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 3276410.1021/acsami.6b08844 ↗
19. Kongkanand · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 112710.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
20. Barkholtz · Catalysts · 2015 · 5 · 95510.3390/catal5020955 ↗
21. Ahluwalia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F109610.1149/2.0851914jes ↗
22. Kriston · Electrochim. Acta · 2014 · 121 · 11610.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.042 ↗
23. Hatzell · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2017 · 5 · 2052710.1039/C7TA07255D ↗
24. Mauger · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F101210.1149/2.0091813jes ↗
25. Cetinbas · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 270 · 59410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.148 ↗
26. Khandavalli · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 4361010.1021/acsami.8b15039 ↗
27. Osmieri · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 45210.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227829 ↗
28. Ngo · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 238 · 110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.055 ↗
29. Cetinbas · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F105910.1149/2.0301813jes ↗
30. Neyerlin · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2007 · 154 · B27910.1149/1.2400626 ↗
31. Lee · J. Power Sources · 2004 · 131 · 20010.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.039 ↗
32. Gasteiger · Appl. Catal. B Environ. · 2005 · 56 · 910.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 ↗
33. Lefèvre · Science · 2009 · 324 · 7110.1126/science.1170051 ↗
34. Karan · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2017 · 5 · 2710.1016/j.coelec.2017.08.018 ↗
35. Baker · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B99110.1149/1.3152226 ↗
36. Spingler · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2017 · 42 · 1396010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.036 ↗
37. Schuler · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F302010.1149/2.0031907jes ↗
38. Greszler · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · F83110.1149/2.061212jes ↗
39. Nonoyama · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · B41610.1149/1.3546038 ↗
40. Ono · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 160 · F77910.1149/2.040308jes ↗
41. Weber · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 161 · 125410.1149/2.0751412jes ↗
42. Frackowiak · Carbon · 2001 · 39 · 93710.1016/S0008-6223(00)00183-4 ↗
43. Osmieri · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2016 · 20 · 350710.1007/s10008-016-3332-2 ↗
44. Li · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · C74510.1149/1.1611493 ↗
45. Makharia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2005 · 152 · A97010.1149/1.1888367 ↗
46. Star · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 45010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227655 ↗
47. Kabir · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 4501610.1021/acsami.9b11365 ↗
48. Orfanidi · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F125410.1149/2.1251814jes ↗
49. Kim · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 908610.1021/la061380q ↗
50. Wang · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 171 · 33110.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.084 ↗
51. Lee · Nano Energy · 2018 · 46 · 27710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.042 ↗
52. Birry · Electrochem. Commun. · 2010 · 12 · 62810.1016/j.elecom.2010.02.016 ↗
53. Osmieri · Appl. Catal. B Environ. · 2019 · 25710.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117929 ↗
54. Jia · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 1249610.1021/acsnano.5b05984 ↗
55. Choi · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 29610.1039/C6EE03005J ↗
56. Xing · Appl. Energy · 2015 · 138 · 24210.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.011 ↗
57. Barkholtz · Mater. Horizons · 2017 · 4 · 2010.1039/C6MH00344C ↗
58. Van Cleve · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 4695310.1021/acsami.9b17614 ↗