The Critical Role of Supporting Electrolyte Selection on Flow Battery Cost
Source abstract
Abstract
© 2017 The Author(s) 2017. Published by ECS. Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid energy storage, but additional cost reductions are needed to meet the U.S. Department of Energy recommended capital cost of $150 kWh-1 for an installed system. The development of new active species designed to lower cost or improve performance is a promising approach, but these new materials often require compatible electrolytes that optimize stability, solubility, and reaction kinetics. This work quantifies changes in RFB cost performance for different aqueous supporting electrolytes paired with different types of membranes. A techno-economic model is also used to estimate RFB-system costs for the different membrane and supporting salt options considered herein. Beyond the conventional RFB design incorporating small active species and an ion-exchange membrane (IEM), this work also considers size-selective separators as a cost-effective alternative to IEMs. The size selective separator (SSS) concept utilizes nanoporous separators with no functionalization for ion selectivity, and the active species are large enough that they cannot pass through the separator pores. Our analysis finds that SSS or H+-IEM are most promising to achieve cost targets for aqueous RFBs, and supporting electrolyte selection yields cost differences in the $100's kWh-1.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
2. Gyuk I. Johnson M. Vetrano J. Lynn K. Parks W. Handa R. Kannberg L. Hearne S. Waldrip K. Braccio R. , Grid Energy Storage, US Department of Energy, Washington DC, (2013).
3. Denholm P. Ela E. Kirby B. Milligan M. , The Role of Energy Storage with Renewable Electricity Generation. NREL/TP-6A2-47187, (2010).10.2172/972169 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.09510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.095 ↗
5. 10.1039/c2ra21342g10.1039/c2ra21342g ↗
6. 10.1149/1.359956510.1149/1.3599565 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10800-011-0348-210.1007/s10800-011-0348-2 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20120069410.1002/adfm.201200694 ↗
9. 10.1109/JPROC.2014.232031710.1109/JPROC.2014.2320317 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.0101601jes10.1149/2.0101601jes ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20160492510.1002/anie.201604925 ↗
12. 10.1038/nchem.246610.1038/nchem.2466 ↗
13. Online: Redflow, “Redflow-Field-Application-Experience-of-Zinc-Bromine-Flow-Batteries-in-a-Smart-Grid,” http://redflow.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Redflow-Field-Application-Experience-of-Zinc-Bromide-Flow-Batteries-in-a-Smart-Grid.pdf; cited July 18, 2017.
14. Winter R. , “Metal halogen electrochemical cell system,” US Pat. US 8956745 B2, Filed February 17, 2015.
15. Tarrant D. , “Electrode configured for turbulence,” US Pat. US 8974940 B1, Filed March 10, 2015.
16. Goeltz J. Amadeo D. Esswein A. J. Jarvi T. D. King E. R. Reece S. Y. Tyagi N. , “Aqueous redox flow batteries comprising metal ligand coordination compounds,” US Pat. US 20160276693 A1, Filed May 27, 2016.
17. 10.1002/er.186310.1002/er.1863 ↗
18. 10.1002/cssc.20160010210.1002/cssc.201600102 ↗
19. Online: Sumitomo Electric, “Redox Flow Battery,” (2016) http://global-sei.com/products/redox/pdf/redox-flow-battery.pdf; cited July 18, 2017.
20. Gellerman B. , “A novel liquid battery could hold potential for unlimited energy storage,” BostonomiX Ser, (2017) http://www.wbur.org/bostonomix/2017/01/09/vanadium-liquid-energy-storage; cited July 18, 2017.
21. Online: Gildemeister, “brochure-cellcube-download-data.pdf,” http://energy.gildemeister.com/blob/260408/75b561f2922f864bf42cc372612c93b9/brochure-cellcube-download-data.pdf; cited July 18, 2017.
22. Online: UniEnergy Technologies, “UET_UniSystem_Product_Sheet_reduced,” http://www.uetechnologies.com/images/product/UET_UniSystem_Product_Sheet_reduced.pdf; cited July 18, 2017.
23. 10.1039/C4EE02158D10.1039/C4EE02158D ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.02310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.023 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.12910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.129 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0221601jes10.1149/2.0221601jes ↗
28. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.04310.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.043 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6EE03554J10.1039/C6EE03554J ↗
30. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0001910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00019 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.6b1098410.1021/jacs.6b10984 ↗
32. 10.1080/15435075.2010.54959810.1080/15435075.2010.549598 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0004910.1021/acsenergylett.6b00049 ↗
34. 10.1149/1.218604010.1149/1.2186040 ↗
35. Esswein A. J. Goeltz J. Jarvi T. D. King E. R. Reece S. Y. Tyagi N. , “Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries Comprising Metal Ligand Coordination Compounds,” WO Pat. WO 2014/018495, Filed January 1, 2014.
36. 10.1149/2.0461503jes10.1149/2.0461503jes ↗
37. 10.1126/science.aab303310.1126/science.aab3033 ↗
38. 10.1149/2.1001409jes10.1149/2.1001409jes ↗
39. 10.1038/nature1290910.1038/nature12909 ↗
40. 10.1016/0022-0728(94)03633-E10.1016/0022-0728(94)03633-E ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.06310.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.063 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0061610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00616 ↗
43. 10.1002/aenm.20150144910.1002/aenm.201501449 ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20160647210.1002/anie.201606472 ↗
45. 10.1039/cs981100004910.1039/cs9811000049 ↗
46. 10.1149/05307.0007ecst10.1149/05307.0007ecst ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.026 ↗
48. 10.1149/2.051208jes10.1149/2.051208jes ↗
49. 10.1149/2.0351704jes10.1149/2.0351704jes ↗
50. 10.1016/j.coche.2015.04.00110.1016/j.coche.2015.04.001 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.coche.2016.08.00210.1016/j.coche.2016.08.002 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00642-610.1016/S0376-7388(00)00642-6 ↗
53. 10.1039/c2jm14898f10.1039/c2jm14898f ↗
54. Online: Pivovar B. , “2011 Alkaline Membrane Fuel Cell Workshop Final Report,” http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54297.pdf; cited July 18, 2017.
55. 10.1039/c3cp51944a10.1039/c3cp51944a ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.09510.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.095 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.083 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.13210.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.132 ↗
59. 10.1149/2.0051601jes10.1149/2.0051601jes ↗
60. 10.1002/anie.20161058210.1002/anie.201610582 ↗
61. Online: “ARPA-E | Breakthrough flow battery stack,” https://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=slick-sheet-project/breakthrough-flow-battery-cell-stack; cited: March 29, 2017.
62. 10.1039/c1ee01117k10.1039/c1ee01117k ↗
63. 10.1002/cssc.20130070610.1002/cssc.201300706 ↗
64. 10.1149/2.083309jes10.1149/2.083309jes ↗
65. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.10210.1038/nenergy.2016.102 ↗
66. Online: Rosemount Analytical, “Conductance Data For Commonly Used Chemicals,” http://www2.emersonprocess.com/siteadmincenter/pm%20Rosemount%20Analytical%20Documents/LIQ_MAN_6039_Conductance_Data_Commonly_Used_Chemicals.pdf; cited: July 18, 2017.
67. 10.1039/C6CS00823B10.1039/C6CS00823B ↗
68. 10.1038/nature1574610.1038/nature15746 ↗
69. 10.1021/ja508482e10.1021/ja508482e ↗
70. 10.1039/C5PY02036K10.1039/C5PY02036K ↗
71. 10.1002/adma.20150500010.1002/adma.201505000 ↗
72. 10.1149/1.213310610.1149/1.2133106 ↗
73. Online: “Celgard 2500,” https://www.ldcgm.com/Celgard/CELGARD-4550.pdf.
74. Bird R. B. Stewart W. E. Lightfoot E. N. , Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed., p. 316, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (2007).
75. 10.1149/1.187079410.1149/1.1870794 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.040 ↗
77. 10.1016/0013-4686(90)85008-B10.1016/0013-4686(90)85008-B ↗
78. 10.1007/BF0100885310.1007/BF01008853 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.020 ↗
80. 10.1149/2.0941409jes10.1149/2.0941409jes ↗
81. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.09610.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.096 ↗
82. 10.1149/2.0201711jes10.1149/2.0201711jes ↗
83. 10.1007/BF0140281610.1007/BF01402816 ↗
84. 10.1149/2.0081601jes10.1149/2.0081601jes ↗
85. 10.1149/2.0231601jes10.1149/2.0231601jes ↗
86. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.07.00410.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.07.004 ↗
87. 10.1023/A:100386701255110.1023/A:1003867012551 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.041 ↗
89. 10.1007/s10008-016-3361-x10.1007/s10008-016-3361-x ↗
90. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.08.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.08.016 ↗
91. Towler G. Sinnott R. K. , Chemical engineering design: principles, practice, and economics of plant process design, 2nd ed., Elsevier, (2012).
92. Online: Lazard, “Lazard's Levelized Cost of Storage - Version 2.0,” https://www.lazard.com/media/438042/lazard-levelized-cost-of-storage-v20.pdf; cited July 18, 2017.
93. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0058610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00586 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.00610.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.006 ↗
95. Turton R. Bailie R. Whiting W. Shaeiwitz J. , Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes, 3rd ed., p. 231, Pearson Education, (2008).
96. Online: “ICIS Indicative Chemical Prices A-Z,” (2006) http://www.icis.com/chemicals/channel-info-chemicals-a-z/; cited July 18, 2017.
97. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.05610.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.056 ↗
98. Liu Y. Lu S. Wang H. Yang C. Su X. Xiang Y. , Adv. Energy Mater., 1601224 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201601224 ↗
99. Schlag S. Glauser J. Yokose K. , Chemical Economics Handbook: Sodium Chloride, (2008).
100. Suresh B. Funada C. Ping Y. , Chemical Economics Handbook: Potassium Chemicals, (2010).