Local Catalyst Support Degradation during Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Start-Up and Shutdown
Source abstract
Abstract
Fuel cell start-up and shutdown can induce high potentials at the cathode, leading to carbon corrosion and platinum dissolution. In technical cells with large active area the degradation processes are inhomogeneous along the flow field, therefore a fundamental understanding in local corrosion is required. Local carbon corrosion is determined from CO 2 emissions measured locally along the cathode channel by in-situ and online mass spectrometric analysis of the reactant gas. Mass spectrometry data is in line with local limiting current measurements and SEM imaging. For complete start/stop cycles carbon corrosion is highest at the hydrogen outlet, followed by the inlet and lowest in the center of the flow field. This spatial inhomogeneity can be explained by the combined effects of diffusive mass transport limitations in the gas diffusion electrode and the pseudo-capacity of the platinum electro-catalyst. A model is presented, explaining opposite findings in the literature by the relative importance of the mass transport effect in different flow field geometries. Cell temperature, relative humidity of the gases and the purging gas velocity influence the relative carbon loss differences along-the-channel. Inhomogeneities up to a factor of 4 are observed and are most prominent at begin of life.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Gallagher K. G. Darling R. M. Fuller T. F. , Handbook of Fuel Cells - Fundamentals, Technology and Applications, Vol. 6, Vielstich W. Gasteiger H. Lamm A. Yokokawa H. , (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (2010).
2. 10.1149/1.235619810.1149/1.2356198 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.05310.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.053 ↗
4. Gu W. Yu P. T. Carter R. Makharia R. Gasteiger H. , Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry - Modeling and Diagnostics of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells, Vol. 49, Pasaogullari U. Wang C. , (Eds.), Springer, New York (2010).
5. Yu P. T. Gu W. Zhang J. Makharia R. Wagner F. T. Gasteiger H. A. , Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability, Büchi F. N. Inaba M. Schmidt T. J. , (Eds.), Springer, New York (2009).
6. 10.1149/1.189646610.1149/1.1896466 ↗
7. Linse N. , PhD Thesis, ETH No. 20132, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich (2012).
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.044 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.278101910.1149/1.2781019 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.059 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.07510.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.075 ↗
12. 10.1149/1.278100810.1149/1.2781008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.06210.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.062 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.09.05310.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.09.053 ↗
15. Schuler G. A. , PhD Thesis, ETH No. 18883, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich (2010).
16. Carter R. Gu W. Brady B. Yu P. T. Subramanian K. Gasteiger H. , Handbook of Fuel Cells - Fundamentals, Technology and Applications, Vol. 6, Vielstich W. Gasteiger H. Lamm A. Yokokawa H. , (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (2009).
17. 10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80252-110.1016/S0022-0728(84)80252-1 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.324600310.1149/1.3246003 ↗
19. Reiser C. Yang D. Sawyer R. D. , US Pat. 2002/0076582 a (2002).
20. Reiser C. Yang D. Sawyer R. D. , US Pat. 2002/0076582 b (2002).
21. 10.1149/1.351852010.1149/1.3518520 ↗
22. Poling B. E. Prausnitz J. M. O’Connell J. P. , The properties of gases and liquids, Vol. 5, McGraw-Hill, New York (2001).
23. 10.1149/1.332788810.1149/1.3327888 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp203016u10.1021/jp203016u ↗
25. 10.1149/1.298197110.1149/1.2981971 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.186449210.1149/1.1864492 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.01310.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.013 ↗