Effects of Synchrotron Radiation on Fuel Cell Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
The performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cells degrades rapidly when cells are exposed to synchrotron radiation (SR) in e.g. X-ray tomographic microscopy (XTM) experiments. Yet, detailed mechanisms of the damage are unknown. Here, the interaction of the cell components with SR is investigated in terms of mechanical and chemical properties as function of the absorbed energy at a photon energy of 13.5 keV with a flux density in the order of 10 13 photons s − 1 cm − 2 . Ex-situ experiments with membranes, catalyst coated membranes, gas diffusion layers (GDL), catalyst coated GDL and PTFE foil are compared to the in-situ degradation dynamics. The external advancing and receding contact angle between water and the substrate (GDL and PTFE), investigated with a Wilhelmy method, decrease with increasing SR exposure. The stress-strain characteristics, the equivalent weight and the FTIR analysis of the membrane indicate that the main chain of the ionomer is cleaved. It is hypothesized that the main reason for the performance degradation under X-ray irradiation is caused by a loss of electrochemically active catalyst surface area due to ionomer degradation and a resulting disintegration of the catalyst layer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.08410.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.084 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.273144010.1063/1.2731440 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.290748510.1063/1.2907485 ↗
4. 10.1107/S090904950800663810.1107/S0909049508006638 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.12.01610.1016/j.electacta.2010.12.016 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.04210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.042 ↗
7. 10.1149/1.359655610.1149/1.3596556 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.03210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.032 ↗
9. Zhang Y. , Synchrotron radiation direct photo etching of polymers, in Lippert T. K. , editor, Polymers and Light, volume 168 of Advances in Polymer Science, p. 39, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg (2004).10.1007/b12684 ↗
10. 10.1143/JJAP.42.398310.1143/JJAP.42.3983 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nima.2009.10.10310.1016/j.nima.2009.10.103 ↗
12. 10.1116/1.57136210.1116/1.571362 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.03710.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.037 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00216005145410.1007/s002160051454 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.01.02010.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.01.020 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.254.5034.98110.1126/science.254.5034.981 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.elspec.2008.01.00210.1016/j.elspec.2008.01.002 ↗
18. Stampanoni M. Groso A. Isenegger A. Mikuljan G. Chen Q. Bertrand A. Henein S. Betemps R. Frommherz U. Böhler P. Meister D. Lange M. Abela R. , volume 6318, p. 63180M. SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA (2006).
19. Stampanoni M. , TOMCAT, Beamline Layout, Optics, URL http://www.psi.ch/sls/tomcat/optics (2011).
20. 10.1006/adnd.1993.101310.1006/adnd.1993.1013 ↗
21. Mathias M. Roth J. Fleming J. Lehnert W. , 46 diffusion media materials and characterisation, in Vielstich W. Lamm A. Gasteiger H. A. , editors, Handbook of Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Technology, Applications, volume 3 of Handbook of Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Technology, Applications, p. 517, Wiley (2003).
22. 10.1002/fuce.20090020010.1002/fuce.200900200 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.03610.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.036 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.04310.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.043 ↗
25. 10.1023/A:101099541152010.1023/A:1010995411520 ↗
26. 10.1139/v80-23710.1139/v80-237 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma020156e10.1021/ma020156e ↗