Evaluation of Current, Future, and Beyond Li-Ion Batteries for the Electrification of Light Commercial Vehicles: Challenges and Opportunities
Source abstract
Abstract
While the electrification of the transportation sector is underway with a consistently increasing market share, segments like light commercial vehicles (LCVs) have not seen any significant market penetration. The major barriers are primarily in the shortcomings in specific energy, power, and cost associated with Li-ion batteries. With an initiative from several automakers to electrify other segments, there is a need to critically examine the performance requirements and to understand the factors governing such a transition in the near-term and long-term. In this study, we develop a systematic methodological framework to analyze the performance demands for electrification through an approach that couples considerations for battery chemistries, load profiles based on a set of vehicle-specific drive cycles, and finally applying these loads to a battery pack that solves a 1-D thermally coupled battery model within the AutoLion-ST framework. Using this framework, we analyze the performance of a fully electric LCV over its lifetime under various driving conditions and explore the trade-offs between battery metrics and vehicle design parameters. We find that in order to enable a driving range of over 400-miles for LCVs at a realistic battery pack weight, specific energies of over 400 Wh/kg at the cell-level and 200 Wh/kg at the pack-level needs to be achieved. A crucial factor that could bring down both the energy requirements and cost is through a vehicle re-design that lowers the drag coefficient to about 0.3.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aac803310.1126/science.aac8033 ↗
2. Global EV Outlook 2016. Beyond one million electric cars. Technical report, International Energy Agency, 2016.
3. Production Statistics. Technical report, O.I. des Constructeurs d'Automobiles., 2015.
4. Greene David L. Plotkin S. E. , Reducing greenhouse gas emission from US transportation. Technical report, Arlington: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2011.
5. 10.1088/2053-1613/2/4/04500210.1088/2053-1613/2/4/045002 ↗
6. 10.1039/c2ee21892e10.1039/c2ee21892e ↗
7. 10.1038/526S93a10.1038/526S93a ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20120142910.1002/anie.201201429 ↗
9. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.S110.1103/RevModPhys.80.S1 ↗
10. Evans David G. Polom Michael E. Poulos Stephen G. Van Maanen Keith D. Zarger Tony H. , Powertrain architecture and controls integration for GM's hybrid full-size pickup truck. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper, 2003.10.4271/2003-01-0085 ↗
11. Kollmeyer Phillip J. Lamb Will Juang Larry W. McFarland James D. Jahns T. M. Sarlioglu B. , “Design of an electric powertrain for a Ford F150 crew cab truck utilizing a lithium battery pack and an interior PM synchronous machine drive. In Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), 2012 IEEE, pages 1. IEEE, 2012.10.1109/ITEC.2012.6243511 ↗
12. Mantravadi Prasanna Husain Iqbal Sozer Yilmaz , Modeling, implementation and analysis of a Li-ion battery powered electric truck. In Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2011 IEEE, pages 1428. IEEE, 2011.10.1109/ECCE.2011.6063948 ↗
13. Musk Elon , https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/852580027178696704, 2017. [Online; accessed 13-April-2017].
14. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
15. 10.1149/1.205468410.1149/1.2054684 ↗
16. 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00162-810.1016/0013-4686(95)00162-8 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.183692110.1149/1.1836921 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.183788410.1149/1.1837884 ↗
19. 10.1149/1.183837610.1149/1.1838376 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00527-310.1016/S0378-7753(99)00527-3 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.00510.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.005 ↗
22. Transportation Secure Data Center. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laborator, 2014.
23. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.07710.1016/j.rser.2012.11.077 ↗
24. 10.1021/jz100553m10.1021/jz100553m ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.00310.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.003 ↗
26. 10.1038/nmat319110.1038/nmat3191 ↗
27. 10.1021/jz100538410.1021/jz1005384 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.07110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.071 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:4(336)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:4(336) ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.01110.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.011 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.01610.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.016 ↗
32. 10.1002/ese3.4710.1002/ese3.47 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.052 ↗
34. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-073009-10094210.1146/annurev-chembioeng-073009-100942 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00340-610.1016/S0013-4686(00)00340-6 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.139170010.1149/1.1391700 ↗
37. 10.1149/1.139362510.1149/1.1393625 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.152651210.1149/1.1526512 ↗
39. Kalupson Jim Luo Gang Shaffer Christian E. , Autolion: a thermally coupled simulation tool for automotive Li-ion batteries, Technical report, SAE Technical Paper, 2013.10.4271/2013-01-1522 ↗
40. 10.1002/er.165210.1002/er.1652 ↗
41. 10.1149/2.047304jes10.1149/2.047304jes ↗
42. 10.1149/1.183882010.1149/1.1838820 ↗
43. 10.1149/1.183882110.1149/1.1838821 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.079 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.16110.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.161 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10800-012-0418-010.1007/s10800-012-0418-0 ↗
47. 10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.1.7910.5012/bkcs.2013.34.1.79 ↗
48. 10.1557/JMR.2010.021410.1557/JMR.2010.0214 ↗
49. 10.1021/jp208428w10.1021/jp208428w ↗
50. 10.1149/1.343255910.1149/1.3432559 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.044 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.01710.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.017 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00703-410.1016/S0013-4686(01)00703-4 ↗
54. 10.1149/1.471797210.1149/1.4717972 ↗
55. 10.1149/1.345987810.1149/1.3459878 ↗
56. 10.1109/TIE.2011.218201810.1109/TIE.2011.2182018 ↗
57. 10.1109/TCSII.2006.88322010.1109/TCSII.2006.883220 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.010 ↗
59. 10.1149/1.304342910.1149/1.3043429 ↗
60. 10.1149/1.163427310.1149/1.1634273 ↗
61. 10.1149/2.049208jes10.1149/2.049208jes ↗
62. Nelson Paul A. Bloom K. G. Dees D. W. I. , Modeling the performance and cost of lithium-ion batteries for electricdrive vehicles. Technical report, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States), 2011.
63. Nelson Paul A. Bloom K. G. Dees D. W. I. , BatPaC (Battery Performance and Cost) Software. Argonne National Laboratory, 2012.
64. 10.1149/2.0611506jes10.1149/2.0611506jes ↗
65. 10.1039/c3ee43870h10.1039/c3ee43870h ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.07810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.078 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.020 ↗
68. Eberhard Martin Tarpenning Marc , The 21st Century Electric Car Tesla Motors. Technical report, Tesla Motors, 2006.
69. Berdichevsky Gene Kelty Kurt Straubel J. B. Toomre Erik , The tesla roadster battery system. Technical report, TeslaMotors, 2006.
70. Kintner-Meyer Michael Schneider Kevin Pratt Robert , “Impacts assessment of plug-in hybrid vehicles on electric utilities and regional US power grids, part 1: Technical analysis.” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 1 (2007).
71. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.trc.2012.06.00710.1016/j.trc.2012.06.007 ↗
73. 10.1149/2.0081514jes10.1149/2.0081514jes ↗
74. 10.1557/mrs.2011.15710.1557/mrs.2011.157 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.03110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.031 ↗
76. Viswanathan Venkatasubramanian , Fundamental Challenges Facing Next-Generation Li-ion Batteries, 2015.10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02411 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.nantod.2012.08.00410.1016/j.nantod.2012.08.004 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.10310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.103 ↗
79. 10.1149/1.183637810.1149/1.1836378 ↗
80. 10.1038/nmat348610.1038/nmat3486 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.cossms.2012.04.00210.1016/j.cossms.2012.04.002 ↗