journal article·2018Open access

The Direct Ammonia Fuel Cell and a Common Pattern of Electrocatalytic Processes

Shimshon Gottesfeld

Abstract

A record power density of 450 mW/cm 2 has been demonstrated for a direct ammonia fuel cell using an alkaline membrane electrolyte. The relative activities of Pt-based and Ir-based AOR catalysts are determined by a lower onset potential at Ir, explained by the higher bond strength Ir-N vs. Pt-N. This beneficial effect of the higher bond strength overrides the opposite effect on the rate of surface dimerization. A mechanistic pattern common to the AOR, ORR, and HOR processes is shown to involve a pre-step preceding the RDS, where the former step is the determinant of the onset potential. This pattern and the role of the pre-step in determining both the onset potential and the form of polarization curves observed for electro-catalytic processes are revealed from rate expressions based on absolute rate theory, with a pre-factor reflecting the potential dependence of the surface populations of active sites and/or reactants for the RDS. A brief discussion of "single descriptors" which have been proposed for such complex electrocatalytic processes suggests that an effective description of these processes would require, as a rule, more than a single descriptor.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Petrow H. G. Allen R. J. , U. S. Pat 3,992,331 (1976).
2. Raistrick I. D. , in Diaphragms, Separators, and Ion-Exchange Membranes, Van Zee J. W. White R. E. Kinoshita K. Burney H. S. , Editors, PV 86-13, p. 72, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ (1986).
3. 10.1149/1.206927710.1149/1.2069277 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.204859010.1149/1.2048590 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.139254410.1149/1.1392544 ↗
6. 10.1021/jp055634c10.1021/jp055634c ↗
7. Wang Jia Adzic Ratko , Meeting Abstracts, US DOE AMR Meeting, 2018
8. 10.1021/jp512981f10.1021/jp512981f ↗
9. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.01110.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0022-0728(01)00491-010.1016/S0022-0728(01)00491-0 ↗
11. 10.1039/b601306f10.1039/b601306f ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0255610.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02556 ↗
13. Gottesfeld S. , in Fuel Cell Catalysis, p. 1, Koper M. T. M. , Editor, John Wiley, New York (2008).
14. 10.1149/06131.0001ecst10.1149/06131.0001ecst ↗
15. 10.1149/06629.0013ecst10.1149/06629.0013ecst ↗
16. Uribe F. Wilson M. S. Springer T. E. Gottesfeld S. , in Structural Effects in Electrocatalysis and Oxygen Electrochemistry, PV 92-11, p. 494, Sherson D. Tryk D. Daroux M. Xing X. , Editors, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ (1992).
17. 10.1021/jp047349j10.1021/jp047349j ↗
18. 10.1021/jp410060810.1021/jp4100608 ↗
19. Kulkarni · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 2502
20. 10.1063/1.492097410.1063/1.4920974 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.117005110.1126/science.1170051 ↗
22. Stamenkovic V. R. Fowler B. Mun B. S. Wang G. Ross P. N. Lucas C. A. Markovic N. M. , Science, 315 (2007).10.1126/science.1135941 ↗
23. 10.1149/1.221875610.1149/1.2218756 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.7b0173510.1021/jacs.7b01735 ↗
25. 10.1039/b703315j10.1039/b703315j ↗