Impact of the Synthesis Conditions on the Performance of LiNixCoyAlzO2 with High Ni and Low Co Content
Source abstract
Abstract
One way to lower the cost of lithium ion batteries using LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 (NMC) or LiNi 0.80 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 is to lower the Co content in the positive electrode materials. This work systematically studied the impact of the synthesis conditions on the performance of LiNi x Co y Al z O 2 (x ≥ 0.8, z ≤ 0.05 and x + y + z = 1) (NCA) with high Ni and low Co content. The impacts of oxygen flow rate, sintering temperature, initial Li/TM ratio and sintering time on the structural and electrochemical properties of NCA were systematically studied. The conditions when impurity phases such as Li 2 CO 3 and Li 5 AlO 4 appear were carefully examined. The impact of residual lithium compounds on the electrochemical performance was also discussed. It was found that the synthesis conditions, which affect the a-axis, c-axis and Ni Li content of the NCA samples, have strong impacts on the lithium diffusion at low and high states of charge based on differential capacity vs. voltage (dQ/dV vs. V) measurements at various rates and temperatures. Additionally, the reversible capacity and cycling stability correlated strongly with the intensity of the dQ/dV vs V peak at 3.5 V (discharge) measured with a C/20 rate at 30°C.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0015010.1021/acsenergylett.6b00150 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.1631713jes10.1149/2.1631713jes ↗
3. 10.1149/2.059302jes10.1149/2.059302jes ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.02910.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.029 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.09910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.099 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11581-016-1750-x10.1007/s11581-016-1750-x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.08.02810.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.08.028 ↗
8. 10.1038/srep2653210.1038/srep26532 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.1691712jes10.1149/2.1691712jes ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.079 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.10310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.103 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.018 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.204845810.1149/1.2048458 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02516-010.1016/S0378-7753(97)02516-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.07.03310.1016/j.elecom.2007.07.033 ↗
16. Ehrlich G. M. Dahn J. R. , in Linden's Handbook of Batteries, New York: McGraw-Hill (2011).
17. 10.1021/cm503505b10.1021/cm503505b ↗
18. 10.1149/2.083404jes10.1149/2.083404jes ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20160288810.1002/aenm.201602888 ↗
20. 10.1021/cr020731c10.1021/cr020731c ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.15810.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.158 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.09210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.092 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10008-017-3643-y10.1007/s10008-017-3643-y ↗
25. 10.1021/cm503833b10.1021/cm503833b ↗
26. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00516-X10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00516-X ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0141210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01412 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10832-006-6705-610.1007/s10832-006-6705-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.18610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.186 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.6b0958510.1021/acsami.6b09585 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.06310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.063 ↗
32. 10.1021/am403684z10.1021/am403684z ↗
33. 10.1149/1.147154110.1149/1.1471541 ↗
34. 10.1149/1.150563310.1149/1.1505633 ↗
35. 10.1149/1.141318210.1149/1.1413182 ↗
36. 10.1149/2.0491811jes10.1149/2.0491811jes ↗
37. 10.1149/1.351507210.1149/1.3515072 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.05.00710.1016/j.ssi.2012.05.007 ↗
39. 10.1039/a805948i10.1039/a805948i ↗
40. 10.1016/S0272-8842(96)00077-610.1016/S0272-8842(96)00077-6 ↗
41. 10.1149/2.0401802jes10.1149/2.0401802jes ↗
42. 10.1149/2.0921714jes10.1149/2.0921714jes ↗