Understanding the Effect of Kinetic and Mass Transport Processes in Cathode Agglomerates
Source abstract
Abstract
A 2D(1D) multi-scale membrane electrode assembly mathematical model is proposed to study the effect of micro-scale transport losses due to catalyst aggregation in the cathode catalyst layer of a fuel cell. In order to develop an analytical expression for micro-scale transport losses, previous agglomerate models assumed an oxygen reduction reaction order of one and neglected any proton transport effects. In this article, a numerical micro-scale spherical ionomer-filled agglomerate model is integrated with a two-dimensional membrane electrode assembly model in order to develop a flexible framework to study different charge, mass, and kinetic transport models that cannot generally be analyzed with an analytical formulation. Results show that there is a significant interplay between scales and that changes in micro-scale agglomerate properties can significantly affect agglomerate effectiveness and current density distributions in the catalyst layer while not significantly affecting overall cell performance. Using the proposed framework, the effects of: a) proton conductivity inside agglomerates, b) a non-equilibrium oxygen dissolution boundary condition, and c) electrochemical models with different oxygen reaction orders, are studied.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.05610.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.056 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.041205jes10.1149/2.041205jes ↗
3. 10.1149/1.212992510.1149/1.2129925 ↗
4. 10.1023/A:101847661281010.1023/A:1018476612810 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.145691610.1149/1.1456916 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.145691710.1149/1.1456917 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00622-510.1016/S0378-7753(02)00622-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.06.02210.1016/j.jelechem.2004.06.022 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.12.00810.1016/j.electacta.2004.12.008 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.08510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.085 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.02810.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.028 ↗
12. 10.1139/v08-05310.1139/v08-053 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.345472510.1149/1.3454725 ↗
14. More K. Reeves K. , DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings, May (2005).
15. 10.1149/1.235619210.1149/1.2356192 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.06810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.068 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.226629410.1149/1.2266294 ↗
18. Uchimura M. Kocha S. , In ECS Meeting (Honolulu, HI, 2008).
19. 10.1149/2.088205jes10.1149/2.088205jes ↗
20. 10.1149/2.123306jes10.1149/2.123306jes ↗
21. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.04.02210.1016/j.elecom.2011.04.022 ↗
22. 10.1021/ma301999a10.1021/ma301999a ↗
23. 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00064-910.1016/S0376-7388(02)00064-9 ↗
24. 10.1149/1.359764410.1149/1.3597644 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.06310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.063 ↗
26. O’Hayre R. Cha S.-W. Colella W. Prinz F. , Fuel Cell Fundamentals. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 2nd edition (2009).
27. 10.1149/1.222125810.1149/1.2221258 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.222125810.1149/1.2221258 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.08.04310.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.08.043 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.09.04910.1016/j.electacta.2006.09.049 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.11110.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.111 ↗
32. 10.1149/1.362460610.1149/1.3624606 ↗
33. 10.1039/b802218f10.1039/b802218f ↗
34. Bird R. B. Stewart W. E. Lightfoot E. , Transport Phenomena. J. Wiley and Sons, 2nd edition (2002).
35. 10.1149/1.359814110.1149/1.3598141 ↗
36. 10.1137/091505610.1137/0915056 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00158-009-0387-z10.1007/s00158-009-0387-z ↗
38. Secanell M. Putz A. Zingan V. Bhaiya M. Moore M. Dobson P. Wardlaw P. Domican K. , Fuel Cell Simulation Toolbox (FCST): User and Developer’s Reference Guide.
39. 10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00305-310.1016/S0017-9310(03)00305-3 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.09310.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.093 ↗
41. 10.1002/fuce.20040002910.1002/fuce.200400029 ↗
42. 10.1002/fuce.20120001710.1002/fuce.201200017 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.02510.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.025 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp037593v10.1021/jp037593v ↗
45. 10.1149/1.294322410.1149/1.2943224 ↗
46. 10.1016/0013-4686(70)85021-610.1016/0013-4686(70)85021-6 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0022-0728(98)00338-610.1016/S0022-0728(98)00338-6 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0022-0728(99)00164-310.1016/S0022-0728(99)00164-3 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.02.00310.1016/j.jelechem.2004.02.003 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.12.00410.1016/j.jelechem.2010.12.004 ↗
51. 10.1016/0013-4686(94)85149-210.1016/0013-4686(94)85149-2 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.08.01310.1016/j.jelechem.2004.08.013 ↗
53. 10.1149/1.298195510.1149/1.2981955 ↗
54. 10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00257-310.1016/S0013-4686(03)00257-3 ↗
55. 10.1021/jp013442l10.1021/jp013442l ↗
56. Bhaiya Madhur , M.Sc. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta (2014).