Stability of Pt Nanoparticles on Alternative Carbon Supports for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Pt supported on carbon black, commonly used as PEM fuel cell catalyst, underlies electrochemical instabilities in terms of carbon corrosion and platinum degradation. To better understand the influence of the support on nature and extent of catalyst aging, Pt was synthesized on four different substrates: Carbon black, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and a nanocomposite of indium tin oxide with rGO (ITO-rGO). The four Pt catalysts and the separate supports were studied on their durability using an accelerated stress test (AST, −0.02–1.40 V SHE ). Comparable platinum degradation was shown by losses of electrochemically active surface area (EASA) and activity for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and by identical location transmission electron microscopy (IL-TEM). With respect to the supports, highest instability of carbon black was observed investigating the double layer capacitance and amounts of hydroquinone (HQ) species. MWCNTs showed the lowest degradation. Thus, AST provoked strongly different extents of support aging but similar Pt degradation. In view of complex FC catalyst degradation mechanism, only negligible Pt detachment caused by support degradation and rather dominating Pt dissolution and agglomeration—additionally evidenced by IL-TEM—is assumed here. Regarding ITO-rGO, neither carbon support nor platinum stabilization by ITO nanoparticles has been observed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.12610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.126 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr050182l10.1021/cr050182l ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.04310.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.043 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.006 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11244-007-9000-010.1007/s11244-007-9000-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.01210.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.012 ↗
7. 10.1021/cr200424d10.1021/cr200424d ↗
8. 10.1002/fuce.20140013610.1002/fuce.201400136 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.03910.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.039 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.161366910.1149/1.1613669 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.3350610.1002/app.33506 ↗
12. 10.1007/978-0-387-85536-310.1007/978-0-387-85536-3 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.06.00110.1016/j.elecom.2013.06.001 ↗
14. 10.1002/fuce.20140013910.1002/fuce.201400139 ↗
15. 10.1002/cssc.20160005010.1002/cssc.201600050 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.05.02710.1016/j.carbon.2005.05.027 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00141-610.1016/S0008-6223(03)00141-6 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja307635r10.1021/ja307635r ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.15510.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.155 ↗
20. 10.1002/fuce.20130003910.1002/fuce.201300039 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.04310.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.043 ↗
22. 10.1002/fuce.20130025810.1002/fuce.201300258 ↗
23. 10.1039/c3cp54457e10.1039/c3cp54457e ↗
24. 10.1149/2.066111jes10.1149/2.066111jes ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.044 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12678-016-0322-110.1007/s12678-016-0322-1 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20140278010.1002/anie.201402780 ↗
28. 10.1021/cr400523y10.1021/cr400523y ↗
29. 10.1149/1.362558010.1149/1.3625580 ↗
30. 10.1039/c0an00262c10.1039/c0an00262c ↗
31. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.02810.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.028 ↗
32. 10.1021/ja107719u10.1021/ja107719u ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.02210.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.022 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.15510.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.155 ↗
35. 10.1021/ja904810h10.1021/ja904810h ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.07610.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.076 ↗
37. 10.1039/c0jm00467g10.1039/c0jm00467g ↗
38. 10.1002/smll.20060042510.1002/smll.200600425 ↗
39. Lide D. R. Baysinger G. Berger L. I. Goldberg R. N. Kehiaian H. V. Kuchitsu K. Rosenblatt G. Roth D. L. Zwillinger D. , CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, p. 2661 (2005).
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.02210.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.022 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12039-009-0012-010.1007/s12039-009-0012-0 ↗
42. Scherrer P. , Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, (1918).
43. 10.1149/1.235618610.1149/1.2356186 ↗
44. 10.1021/nn901850u10.1021/nn901850u ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.01110.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.011 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.05710.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.057 ↗
47. 10.1016/0013-4686(94)85149-210.1016/0013-4686(94)85149-2 ↗
48. 10.1149/2.0551512jes10.1149/2.0551512jes ↗
49. Özaslan M. , in “Fakultät II – Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften”, Vol. PhD, p. 214. Technischen Universität Berlin, Berlin, 2012.
50. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.09.03010.1016/j.electacta.2009.09.030 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.09.00910.1016/j.jelechem.2013.09.009 ↗
52. 10.1039/b303911k10.1039/b303911k ↗
53. 10.1007/s12678-016-0304-310.1007/s12678-016-0304-3 ↗
54. 10.1021/la202913b10.1021/la202913b ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.00310.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.003 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.03.03310.1016/j.cattod.2012.03.033 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.08210.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.082 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.11210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.112 ↗
59. 10.1149/2.072404jes10.1149/2.072404jes ↗
60. 10.1007/BF0088343610.1007/BF00883436 ↗
61. 10.1149/06917.1179ecst10.1149/06917.1179ecst ↗
62. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.01910.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.019 ↗
63. 10.1149/1.163041210.1149/1.1630412 ↗
64. 10.1149/2.120306jes10.1149/2.120306jes ↗
65. 10.1149/1.219114710.1149/1.2191147 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.00310.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.003 ↗
67. Bard A. J. Parsons R. Jordan J. , Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution, CRC Press (1985).
68. 10.1149/2.078306jes10.1149/2.078306jes ↗