journal article·2017Open access

Electrochemical Hydrogen Compression: Efficient Pressurization Concept Derived from an Energetic Evaluation

Michel Suermann, Thomas Kiupel, Thomas J. Schmidt, Felix N. Büchi

Abstract

Electrochemical hydrogen compression is a potentially high efficient, low-maintenance and silent technology to produce high pressure hydrogen. A new pressure concept with increased compression efficiency, termed intermediate differential pressure polymer electrolyte water electrolysis is proposed. With slightly pressurized oxygen and a much higher hydrogen pressure, this pressure concept profits from the advantages of the lower gas crossover of differential (only hydrogen compressed) pressure water electrolysis and the improved oxygen evolution reaction kinetics with increasing pressure of balanced pressure operation. Data for gas pressures up to 100 MPa is modeled, based on experimental results up to 5 MPa, of the three pressure concepts and validated with literature data up to 70 MPa. While differential pressure electrolyzer operation, following ideal isothermal compression, can be more efficient than today's best mechanical compressors up to 40 MPa, the intermediate pressure concept shows higher compression efficiency up to 90 MPa.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data/database, (accessed on 31.01.2017).
2. Erneuerbare Energien in Zahlen - Nationale und internationale Entwicklung im Jahr 2015, in, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi) (2016).
3. 10.1039/c3ee41973h10.1039/c3ee41973h ↗
4. Monitoringbericht 2016, in, G. Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen; Bundeskartellamt Editor, Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas,Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen; Bundeskartellamt (2016).
5. Smolinka T. Ojong E. T. Garche J. , in Electrochemical Energy Storage for Renewable Sources and Grid Balancing, Moseley P. T. Garche J. Editors, p. 103 (2015).10.1016/B978-0-444-62616-5.00008-5 ↗
6. https://energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-hydrogen-production-electro-lysis, (accessed on 10.03.2017).
7. Alkire J. , Technology Validation Program Area - Plenary Presentation, U. S. Department of Energy, 2017 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (2017).
8. http://www.energiepark-mainz.de/, (accessed on 10.03.2017).
9. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.14510.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.145 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1464-2859(14)70266-410.1016/S1464-2859(14)70266-4 ↗
11. Stefan M. , in, 20th World Hydrogen Energy Conference (WHEC), KDJ Convention Center Gwangju, South Korea (2014).
12. Ishikawa H. Haryu E. Kawasaki N. Daimon H. , Honda R&D Technical Review, 28 (2016).
13. 10.1149/06403.1009ecst10.1149/06403.1009ecst ↗
14. Bessarabov D. G. Wang H. Li H. Zhao N. , PEM Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production: Principles and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (USA) (2015).10.1201/b19096 ↗
15. Bertuccioli L. Chan A. Hart D. Lehner F. Madden B. Standen E. , Study on Development of Water Electrolysis in the EU by E4tech S`arl with Element Energy Ltd for the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking, in (2014).
16. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.15110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
17. Mittelsteadt C. K. Staser J. A. , in Polymer Science: A Comprehensive Reference, p. 849 (2012).10.1016/B978-0-444-53349-4.00296-X ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.03810.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.038 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.13517109jes10.1149/2.13517109jes ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.22410.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.224 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.12010.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.120 ↗
22. Barin I. Platzki G. , Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances, p. 795, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim (1995).10.1002/9783527619825 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.12710.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.127 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja01316a02210.1021/ja01316a022 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0304-386X(98)00007-310.1016/S0304-386X(98)00007-3 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:101673500310110.1023/A:1016735003101 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.348449610.1149/1.3484496 ↗
28. 10.1149/2.0231611jes10.1149/2.0231611jes ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.05810.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.058 ↗
30. Siemens, Bayern-Innovativ-Kongress: Energiespeicher - Technologien für die zukünftige Stromversorgung, Nuremberg, Germany (2011).
31. NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database (REFPROP): Version 8.0, (accessed on 06.04.2017).
32. Melaina M. W. Antonia O. Penev M. , Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues, in, NREL (2013).
33. 10.1039/C4EE00440J10.1039/C4EE00440J ↗
34. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.00410.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.01210.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.012 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00941-710.1016/S0378-7753(01)00941-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.09610.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.096 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.solener.2004.09.00310.1016/j.solener.2004.09.003 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0415510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04155 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.01010.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.010 ↗
41. 10.1149/1.211411110.1149/1.2114111 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.1441704jes10.1149/2.1441704jes ↗