journal article·2012

Superior Performance of LiFePO4Aqueous Dispersions via Corona Treatment and Surface Energy Optimization

Jianlin Li, Christopher Rulison, Jim Kiggans, Claus Daniel, David L. Wood

Publisher page

Abstract

In lithium-ion battery electrode processing, obtaining good wetting and adhesion of the electrode dispersion to the current collector foil is essential for achieving high capacity and good long-term performance. The surface tension of LiFePO 4 aqueous dispersions is much higher than the surface energy of untreated Al foil due to the high surface tension of water (72.8 mN/m), which causes inferior wetting during the coating step. In this work it has been shown that the surface energy of Al foil is significantly increased by corona plasma treatment. Consequently, the wetting and adhesion of the LiFePO 4 aqueous dispersion to the Al foil are dramatically improved, as evidenced by contact angle measurements, adhesion energy calculations and interfacial tension calculations. The LiFePO 4 cathodes with corona treated Al foil exhibited superior capacity (∼20 mAh/g improvement) with no increase in capacity fade at 0.5C/−0.5C cycling compared to an identical electrode without treatment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.001 ↗
3. Gainese J. Cuenza R. , Costs of lithium-ion-batteries for vehicles, in Report ANL/ESD-42, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL (2000).
4. 10.1021/la205157d10.1021/la205157d ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.02510.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.025 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.02710.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.027 ↗
7. 10.1149/1.296628610.1149/1.2966286 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.06710.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.067 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.201228710.1149/1.2012287 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.217707110.1149/1.2177071 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10853-006-1172-710.1007/s10853-006-1172-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.040 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.304612910.1149/1.3046129 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.330859510.1149/1.3308595 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.08810.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.088 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-007-2068-x10.1007/s10853-007-2068-x ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.073 ↗
18. Nahass P. Rhine W. E. Pober R. L. Bowen H. K. Robbins W. L. , in American Ceramic Society, Nair K. M. Pohanka R. Buchanan R. C. , Editors, p. 355, Westerville, OH (1990).
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.08710.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.087 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00364-110.1016/S0032-3861(03)00364-1 ↗
21. Christopher R. , Adhesion energy and interfacial tension, in Application Note 415, Rulison C. Editor, Newbury, OH (www.augustinescientific.com).
22. Hansen · Tappi Journal · 1993 · 76 · 171
23. Sun · Tappi Journal · 1998 · 81 · 177
24. Bezigian · Tappi Journal · 1992 · 75 · 139
25. 10.1103/PhysRev.17.27310.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
26. 10.1021/ie50660a00810.1021/ie50660a008 ↗
27. 10.1021/ie50660a00810.1021/ie50660a008 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.157479810.1063/1.1574798 ↗
29. 10.1149/1.343255910.1149/1.3432559 ↗