journal article·2016Open access

Mechanical Degradation of Graphite/PVDF Composite Electrodes: A Model-Experimental Study

Kenji Takahashi, Kenneth Higa, Sunil Mair, Mahati Chintapalli, Nitash Balsara, Venkat Srinivasan

Abstract

Mechanical failure modes of a graphite/polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) composite electrode for lithium-ion batteries were investigated by combining realistic stress-stain tests and mathematical model predictions. Samples of PVDF mixed with conductive additive were prepared in a similar way to graphite electrodes and tested while submerged in electrolyte solution. Young's modulus and tensile strength values of wet samples were found to be approximately one-fifth and one-half of those measured for dry samples. Simulations of graphite particles surrounded by binder layers given the measured material property values suggest that the particles are unlikely to experience mechanical damage during cycling, but that the fate of the surrounding composite of PVDF and conductive additive depends completely upon the conditions under which its mechanical properties were obtained. Simulations using realistic property values produced results that were consistent with earlier experimental observations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.008 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10008-006-0095-110.1007/s10008-006-0095-1 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.320548510.1149/1.3205485 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.326180910.1149/1.3261809 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.326999510.1149/1.3269995 ↗
7. 10.1149/2.049210jes10.1149/2.049210jes ↗
8. 10.1149/2.132306jes10.1149/2.132306jes ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.332791310.1149/1.3327913 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.0281504jes10.1149/2.0281504jes ↗
12. 10.1149/1.239872510.1149/1.2398725 ↗
13. 10.1021/am100871y10.1021/am100871y ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.04310.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.043 ↗
15. 10.1002/polb.2009910.1002/polb.20099 ↗
16. 10.1149/1.158692210.1149/1.1586922 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.239872510.1149/1.2398725 ↗
18. Zheng H. Liu G. Crawford S. Battaglia V. S. , http://bestar.lbl.gov/vbattaglia/cell-analysis-tools/.
19. Mandelkern L. Alamo R. G. , Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook, 2nd ed., Mark J. E. , editor, ch. 11, p. 174 (2007).
20. 10.1149/2.046308jes10.1149/2.046308jes ↗
21. 10.1149/2.054304jes10.1149/2.054304jes ↗
22. 10.1149/2.0091507jes10.1149/2.0091507jes ↗
23. 10.1021/nl300570d10.1021/nl300570d ↗
24. 10.1039/c4cp01968g10.1039/c4cp01968g ↗
25. 10.1021/am505847s10.1021/am505847s ↗
26. 10.1149/1.138817810.1149/1.1388178 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.275984010.1149/1.2759840 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.11310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.113 ↗
29. 10.1149/1.184768510.1149/1.1847685 ↗
30. 10.1016/0032-3861(80)90079-810.1016/0032-3861(80)90079-8 ↗
31. 10.1002/pen.76031040510.1002/pen.760310405 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0014-3057(96)00182-610.1016/S0014-3057(96)00182-6 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00222-X10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00222-X ↗
34. 10.1080/0015019990823029810.1080/00150199908230298 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00184-710.1016/S0032-3861(01)00184-7 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.04410.1016/j.msea.2004.09.044 ↗
37. 10.1149/2.088309jes10.1149/2.088309jes ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.02.07610.1016/j.cplett.2007.02.076 ↗
39. 10.1080/18811248.1987.973584510.1080/18811248.1987.9735845 ↗
40. 10.1016/0008-6223(91)90089-210.1016/0008-6223(91)90089-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.02210.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.022 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.02.00910.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.02.009 ↗