journal article·2012

Cobalt Polishing with Reduced Galvanic Corrosion at Copper/Cobalt Interface Using Hydrogen Peroxide as an Oxidizer in Colloidal Silica-Based Slurries

B. C. Peethala, H. P. Amanapu, U. R. K. Lagudu, S. V. Babu

Publisher page

Abstract

A colloidal silica-based slurry with H 2 O 2 (1 wt%) as the oxidizer and arginine (0.5 wt%) as the complexing agent was found to polish cobalt (Co) with superior performance (better post-polish surface quality and no pit formation) at pH 10 compared to pH 6 and 8. At pH 10, there is no measurable dissolution of Co and an open circuit potential (E oc ) difference of ∼20 mV between Cu and Co, suggestive of reduced galvanic corrosion. Our results also suggest that, during polishing, the Co film surface was covered with a passive film, possibly of Co(III) oxides. Addition of 5 mM BTA to this slurry inhibited Cu dissolution rates and yielded a Co/Cu removal rate ratio of ∼1.2 while further reducing the E oc difference between Cu and Co to ∼10 mV, both very desirable attributes. The roles of H 2 O 2 , arginine, and silica abrasives as well as the pH on the Co material removal process are discussed and a removal mechanism is proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced materials and composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Van Olmen J. List S. Tokei Z. Carbonell L. Brongersma S. H. Volders H. Kunnen E. Heylen N. Ciofi I. Khandelwal A. Gelatos J. Mandrekar T. Boelen P. , in Proceedings of the International Interconnect Technology Conf., Burlingame, CA, IEEE 2007, p. 49.10.1109/IITC.2007.382338 ↗
2. 10.1149/1.351852210.1149/1.3518522 ↗
3. Gordon R. G. Kim H. Au Y. B. Wang H. Bhandari H. B. Liu Y. Lee D. K. Lin Y. , Proceedings of Advanced Metallization Conf. (AMC 2008), San Diego, CA, U.S.A. (2008).
4. 10.1149/1.203993910.1149/1.2039939 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.311724210.1149/1.3117242 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.160527110.1149/1.1605271 ↗
7. Wojcik H. Kaltofen R. Merkel U. Krien C. Strehle S. Gluch J. Knaut M. Wenzel C. Preusse A. Bartha J. W. Geidel M. Adolphi B. Neumann V. Liske R. Munnik F. , Microelectronic Engg. (2011).
8. 10.1149/1.352894210.1149/1.3528942 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.358930810.1149/1.3589308 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.192492910.1149/1.1924929 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0039-6028(03)00819-710.1016/S0039-6028(03)00819-7 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.199375910.1063/1.1993759 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.275040210.1063/1.2750402 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.277369910.1063/1.2773699 ↗
15. Ma P. Qian L. Sundarrajan A. Jiang L. Aubuchon J. Tseng J. Kumar N. Okazaki M. Yuchun W. You W. Yufei C. Naik M. Emesh I. Narasimhan M. , in Proceedings of the Interconnect Technology Conference, Sapporo, Japan, 2009, IEEE International (2009), p. 38.10.1109/IITC.2009.5090334 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.01.03510.1016/j.mee.2009.01.035 ↗
17. 10.1143/JJAP.49.05FC0310.1143/JJAP.49.05FC03 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.03.01810.1016/j.electacta.2007.03.018 ↗
19. 10.1023/A:100389312220110.1023/A:1003893122201 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.08.00810.1016/j.corsci.2004.08.008 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja00442a01110.1021/ja00442a011 ↗
22. Joshi S. K. Hinge V. K. Shrivastava B. D. , 13th International Conference of X-ray absorption fine structure - XAFS13, Stanford, CA, USA 882 (2007).
23. 10.1021/ja01045a01510.1021/ja01045a015 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja01650a01810.1021/ja01650a018 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.04410.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.044 ↗
26. 10.1021/cm048478f10.1021/cm048478f ↗
27. 10.1149/1.208328710.1149/1.2083287 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.139397910.1149/1.1393979 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0010-938X(70)80026-910.1016/S0010-938X(70)80026-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.11.05710.1016/j.jcis.2007.11.057 ↗
31. 10.1023/A:102656042209010.1023/A:1026560422090 ↗
32. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000013934.85378.4010.1023/B:JMSC.0000013934.85378.40 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.03.01610.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.03.016 ↗