journal article·2017Open access

Operando X-ray Diffraction Study of Polycrystalline and Single-Crystal LixNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2

Rochelle Weber, Christopher R. Fell, J. R. Dahn, Sunny Hy

Abstract

Pouch cells made with single-crystal Li x Ni 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 positive electrodes have recently shown superior capacity retention over equivalent pouch cells made with polycrystalline Li x Ni 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 . 1 This paper aims to further understand the cycling behavior of polycrystalline and single-crystal Li x Ni 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 through an operando X-ray diffraction study, which reveals identical trends in lattice parameter evolution and unit cell volume change during cycling for the two materials. In addition, coin-cell cycling experiments used to examine the initial irreversible capacity loss observed for both materials indicate that it is primarily caused by kinetic limitations of lithium intercalation. Additional X-ray diffraction experiments show much higher c -lattice preferred orientation for electrodes made from single-crystal material, and SEM images of the electrodes reveal a shearing effect in single-crystal particles caused by electrode calendaring.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/2.0991707jes10.1149/2.0991707jes ↗
2. 10.1021/acscentsci.5b0022310.1021/acscentsci.5b0022310.1021/acscentsci.5b0022310.1021/acscentsci.5b00223 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.01710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.01710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.01710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.017 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.06310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.063 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.083 ↗
6. Zhu L. Paulsen J. AHN H. S. HONG H. , (2017) http://www.google.com/patents/EP3114722A1.
7. 10.1039/C2TA00678B10.1039/C2TA00678B10.1039/C2TA00678B10.1039/C2TA00678B ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.045 ↗
9. 10.1039/C5CP03228H10.1039/C5CP03228H ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.105 ↗
11. Cheng G. Li B. Kaye S. , (2014) http://www.google.com/patents/US20140272553.
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.02.01710.1016/j.electacta.2004.02.017 ↗
13. Larson A. C. Von Dreele R. B. , General Structure Analysis System (GSAS), (2000).
14. 10.1107/S002188980100224210.1107/S0021889801002242 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRev.56.97810.1103/PhysRev.56.978 ↗
16. Mueller-Neuhaus J. R. , thesis Dalhousie University, (1997).
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1174610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11746 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.10430610.1103/PhysRevB.78.104306 ↗