In-Situ Measurement of Current Distribution in a Li-Ion Cell
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reports in-situ measurements of current distribution in a Li-ion battery using a newly developed pouch cell with a segmented electrode. It is shown that current distribution is non-uniform from the beginning of discharge and evolves dramatically as discharge proceeds. Initially, segments closer to the negative tab generate higher local currents, which is attributed to the ohmic potential drop along the negative current collector. However, toward the end of discharge the current distribution reverses in pattern due to local SOC non-uniformity developed by uneven current production in early stages. Current distribution is more uniform at lower C rates and lower temperatures. In cells operated close to the equilibrium (e.g. at low C-rates or higher temperatures), current distribution tends to be wavy as it is dominated by the SOC non-uniformity effect and reflective of multiple plateaus in the open-circuit voltage vs. SOC curve. In contrast, current distribution exhibits a monotonic variation in cells operated at highly non-equilibrium as the ohmic potential drop along the current collector becomes more controlling. Local SOC distribution is calculated based on measured local currents. The SOC distribution is found not uniform, even at cutoff during high C rate discharge, suggesting strongly under-utilization of active materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Dahn J. Ehrlich G. M. , Chapter 26 in Linden's Handbook of Batteries, 4th ed., Reddy T. B. Linden D. , Editors, McGraw-Hill, New York (2010).
2. 10.1039/c1ee01598b10.1039/c1ee01598b ↗
3. DOE, Fiscal Year 2011 Progress Report for Energy Storage R&D, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/resources/vt_es_fy11.html, (2012).
4. 10.1149/1.312638510.1149/1.3126385 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.070 ↗
6. Smith K. Markel T. Kim G. H. Pesaran A. , Design of Electric Drive Vehicle Batteries for Long Life and Low Cost, in IEEE Workshop on Accelerated Stress Testing and Reliability (ASTR), Oct. 6-8, Denver, Colorado (2010).
7. Zhao W. Luo G. Wang C. Y. , Energy & Environ. Sci., submitted for publication (2013).
8. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.038 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.05010.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.050 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.349599210.1149/1.3495992 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.070 ↗
13. 10.1149/2.018203jes10.1149/2.018203jes ↗
14. 10.1002/er.165210.1002/er.1652 ↗
15. Luo G. Wang C. Y. , Chapter 7 in Lithium-Ion Batteries, Yuan X. Liu H. Zhang J. , Editors, CRC Press (2012).
16. 10.1149/1.297969610.1149/1.2979696 ↗
17. 10.1021/jz100634n10.1021/jz100634n ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20110015710.1002/adfm.201100157 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nima.2011.03.02310.1016/j.nima.2011.03.023 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.356634110.1149/1.3566341 ↗
21. 10.3390/s11100994210.3390/s111009942 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.105 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20080398110.1002/anie.200803981 ↗
24. Celgard, Celgard High Performance Battery Separators, http://www.celgard.com/pdf/library/Celgard_Product_Comparison_10002.pdf, (2009).
25. Eom J. Y. Cao L. Wang C. Y. , J Power Sources, submitted for publication (2013).
26. 10.1038/nmat163410.1038/nmat1634 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.222084910.1149/1.2220849 ↗
28. Bard A. J. Faulkner L. R. , Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2001).
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.04110.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.041 ↗
30. Laughton M. A. Warne D. F. , Electrical Engineer's Reference Book, 16th ed., p. 1/29, Elsevier (2003).10.1016/B978-075064637-6/50029-0 ↗