Quality Implications of Foreign Metallic Particles in the Membrane Electrode Assembly of a Fuel Cell
Source abstract
Abstract
Foreign metallic particles unintentionally trapped within the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) may adversely affect quality and yield of high-volume fuel cell production, for instance by damaging the membrane or releasing metallic cation contaminants. The present work aims to understand the impacts of 55 ± 5 μm Fe and SS316L metallic particles present at the membrane - cathode catalyst layer (CCL) interface during fuel cell fabrication, conditioning, and diagnostics. In-situ X-ray computed tomography imaging of particle-laden MEAs within a customized small-scale fuel cell fixture reveals that Fe particles undergo complete dissolution within the first air starve cycle of the conditioning phase. After dissolution, legacy particles are observed to incur considerable damage within the MEA, including void spaces at the membrane-CCL interface, membrane thinning, CCL cracks, and membrane rupture. In stark contrast, the SS316L particles feature negligible dissolution during fuel cell conditioning and diagnostics and remain largely intact, merely causing membrane-CCL delamination in their vicinity. Post-operation chemical analysis by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry indicates Fe ion concentrations in the range of 800–950 ppm and 10–25 ppm for the Fe and SS316L laden MEAs, respectively, which correlates to visual observations of particle dissolution and slight reductions in fuel cell performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Advances in stationary and portable fuel cell applications10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.057 ↗
2. Applications of proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems10.1016/j.rser.2006.01.005 ↗
3. A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030 ↗
4. Overcoming the challenges for a mass manufacturing machine for the assembly of PEMFC stacks10.3390/machines7040066 ↗
5. Benjamin · 2017
6. A review of functions, attributes, properties and measurements for the quality control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell components10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229540 ↗
7. Rapid detection of defects in fuel-cell electrodes using infrared reactive- fl ow-through technique10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.124 ↗
8. Applying infrared thermography as a quality-control tool for the rapid detection of polymer-electrolyte-membrane-fuel-cell catalyst-layer-thickness variations10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.030 ↗
9. Recent progress of catalyst ink for roll-to-roll manufacturing paired with slot die coating for proton exchange membrane fuel cells10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.02.022 ↗
10. Morphological features (defects) in fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.027 ↗
11. Investigation of catalyst layer defects in catalyst-coated membrane for PEMFC application: non-destructive method10.1002/er.4107 ↗
12. The operation characteristics of MEAs with pinholes for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells10.1149/1.2937450 ↗
13. Impacts of bubble defects in proton exchange membranes on fuel cell performance and durability10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234072 ↗
14. The effect of membrane casting irregularities on initial fuel cell performance10.1002/fuce.201900149 ↗
15. Utilizing a segmented fuel cell to study the effects of electrode coating irregularities on pem fuel cell initial performance10.1002/fuce.201600214 ↗
16. Impacts of cathode catalyst layer defects on performance and durability in PEM fuel cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233565 ↗
17. Ink degradation and its effects on the crack formation of fuel cell catalyst layers10.1149/2.0411902jes ↗
18. Mitigation of mechanical membrane degradation in fuel cells by controlling electrode morphology: a 4D in situ structural characterization10.1149/1945-7111/abef87 ↗
19. In situ metal ion contamination and the effects on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.086 ↗
20. Toward a comprehensive understanding of cation effects in proton exchange membrane fuel cells10.1021/acsami.2c07085 ↗
21. Durability of perfluorinated ionomer membrane against hydrogen peroxide10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.043 ↗
22. Effect of H2O2 on Nafion® properties and conductivity at fuel cell conditions10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.133 ↗
23. Aspects of the chemical degradation of PFSA ionomers used in PEM fuel cells10.1002/fuce.200400050 ↗
24. Comparison of two accelerated Nafion degradation experiments10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.10.001 ↗
25. Kinetic study of Nafion degradation by Fenton reaction10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.043 ↗
26. Effect of free radical-induced degradation on water permeation through PFSA ionomer membranes10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.118 ↗
27. Ex situ investigation of the proton exchange membrane chemical decomposition10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.052 ↗
28. Durability of PEM fuel cell cathode in the presence of Fe3+ and Al3+10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.003 ↗
29. Editors’ choice—diffusion media for cation contaminant transport suppression into fuel cell electrodes10.1149/1945-7111/abde82 ↗
30. Effect of catalyst layer defects on local membrane degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.016 ↗
31. Yelvington · 2018 · 1
32. 4D imaging of chemo-mechanical membrane degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cells - Part 2: unraveling the coupled degradation mechanisms within the active area10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230673 ↗
33. 3D printed flow field and fixture for visualization of water distribution in fuel cells by X-ray computed tomography10.1149/2.0461613jes ↗
34. AC impedance technique in PEM fuel cell diagnosis-A review10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.05.036 ↗
35. Communication—effect of micro-XCT X-ray exposure on the performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cells10.1149/2.0751610jes ↗
36. Direct analysis of solid samples by fs-LA-ICP-MS10.1016/j.trac.2007.08.008 ↗
37. Development of a low temperature decal transfer method for the fabrication of proton exchange membrane fuel cells10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.127 ↗
38. Role of the glass transition temperature of Nafion 117 membrane in the preparation of the membrane electrode assembly in a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.121 ↗
39. Scan angle selection and volume fusion for reducing metal artifacts by multiple X-ray CT scanning10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.07.020 ↗
40. Improved decal transfer method to reduce membrane damage from foreign particles in membrane electrode assembly10.1149/1945-7111/ad0dc3 ↗
41. The use of multiple pseudo-physiological solutions to simulate the degradation behavior of pure iron as a metallic resorbable implant: a surface-characterization study10.1039/C6CP02451C ↗
42. Grain-dependent passivation of iron in sulfuric acid solution10.1149/2.0901414jes ↗
43. Influence of Al content and pre-oxidation on the aqueous corrosion resistance of binary Fe-Al alloys in sulphuric acid10.1016/j.corsci.2018.12.040 ↗
44. Electrochemical polarization and passivation of iron in acid solutions10.1007/BF00810926 ↗
45. Effects of O2 and H2 on the corrosion of SS316L metallic bipolar plate materials in simulated anode and cathode environments of PEM fuel cells10.1016/j.electacta.2007.05.001 ↗
46. Corrosion characteristics and fuel cell performance of a cost-effective high Mn–Low Ni austenitic stainless steel as an alternative to SS 316L bipolar plate10.1002/er.5422 ↗
47. Effect of cations (Na+, Ca2+, Fe3+) on the conductivity of a Nafion membrane10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.05.005 ↗