Influence and Improvement of Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication Methods for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis
Source abstract
Abstract
The performance of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is crucial for its commercialization. The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) preparation process determines the catalyst layer’s (CL) structure, thereby influencing PEMWE performance. Herein, the effects of conventional preparation methods, i.e., direct spray deposition and decal transfer, on the CL were investigated. It was found that the MEA prepared via the decal process exhibits lower activation and Ohmic overpotential. For decal transfer CL, this is due to the improved electrochemically active surface area and proton conduction, derived from the improved catalyst-ionomer agglomerates interconnection and CL-membrane interfacial contact. For direct spray deposition CL, the crack and larger pores in CL facilitate its water-gas transport. On this basis, a hierarchical CL was designed in order to combine the advantages of direct spray deposition and decal transfer. As a result, the hierarchical CL shows better performance than both direct spray deposition and decal transfer CL. The Ohmic and mass transfer losses are reduced by 13% and 15% at 4 A cm−2, respectively. This work provides valuable insights for MEA development, crucial for the large-scale application of PEMWE.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Essentials of high performance water electrolyzers–from catalyst layer materials to electrode engineering10.1002/aenm.202101998 ↗
2. Key components and design strategy for a proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer10.1002/sstr.202200130 ↗
3. Novel components in proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolyzers (PEMWE): status, challenges and future needs. A mini review10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106704 ↗
4. Analysis of voltage losses in PEM water electrolyzers with low platinum group metal loadings10.1149/2.0641805jes ↗
5. Effect of perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer in anode catalyst layer on proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer performance10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233413 ↗
6. Elucidating effects of catalyst loadings and porous transport layer morphologies on operation of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121213 ↗
7. Three-dimensional microstructure analysis of a polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyzer anode10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.089 ↗
8. Elucidating the effect of mass transport resistances on hydrogen crossover and cell performance in PEM water electrolyzers by varying the cathode ionomer content10.1149/2.0171908jes ↗
9. Influence of ionomer content in IrO2/TiO2 electrodes on PEM water electrolyzer performance10.1149/2.0231611jes ↗
10. The impact of ink and spray variables on catalyst layer properties, electrolyzer performance, and electrolyzer durability10.1149/1945-7111/abc746 ↗
11. Directly coated membrane electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis10.1016/j.elecom.2019.106640 ↗
12. Roll-to-roll production of catalyst coated membranes for low-temperature electrolyzers10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228819 ↗
13. A brief introduction of electrode fabrication for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers10.1088/2515-7655/acccb1 ↗
14. Studies on structure property relations of efficient decal substrates for industrial grade membrane electrode assembly development in pemfc10.1038/s41598-018-30215-0 ↗
15. Development of poly (arylene ether sulfone)-based blend membranes containing aliphatic moieties for the low-temperature decal transfer method10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120853 ↗
16. Optimization of catalyst-coated membranes for enhancing performance in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.239 ↗
17. Influence of iridium oxide loadings on the performance of PEM water electrolysis cells: Part I–Pure IrO2-based anodes10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.013 ↗
18. Utilization of the catalyst layer of dimensionally stable anodes. Part 2: Impact of spatial current distribution on electrocatalytic performance10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.09.034 ↗
19. Quantitative in situ analysis of ionomer structure in fuel cell catalytic layers10.1021/acsami.6b07188 ↗
20. Microscopic analysis of current and mechanical properties of Nafion® studied by atomic force microscopy10.3390/membranes2040783 ↗
21. Degradation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis cells: looking beyond the cell voltage increase10.1149/2.1451910jes ↗
22. Bubble management in PEM water electrolysis via imprinting patterned grooves on catalyst layer10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124249 ↗
23. Bubble evolution and transport in PEM water electrolysis: Mechanism, impact, and management10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101075 ↗
24. Utilization of the catalyst layer of dimensionally stable anodes—Interplay of morphology and active surface area10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.101 ↗
25. How to minimise destabilising effect of gas bubbles on water splitting electrocatalysts?10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100797 ↗
26. Rational design of the electrode morphology for oxygen evolution–enhancing the performance for catalytic water oxidation10.1039/c3ra45998e ↗
27. Hierarchical wrinkle-structured catalyst layer/membrane interface for ultralow Pt-loading polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs)10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04354 ↗
28. Exploring and understanding the internal voltage losses through catalyst layers in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis devices10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119213 ↗
29. Numerical study of the impact of two-phase flow in the anode catalyst layer on the performance of proton exchange membrane water electrolysers10.1149/1945-7111/acc898 ↗