journal article·2023-12-01

Review—Recent Advances in Nanosensors for Precision Agriculture

Shi Wun Tong, Wei Peng Goh, Changyun Jiang

Publisher page

Abstract

Accurate assessment of plant health conditions across thousands of crops is a challenging undertaking in high density indoor farming as the environmental conditions experienced by individual plants can be very different. Manually inspecting visible symptoms of plant diseases is also not a feasible method because the process is time-consuming and human evaluations are subjective. Compared with traditional bulky sensors, nanosensor-based array can be seamlessly attached onto the plants to identify the onset and type of stress in-vivo via the detection of the plant signaling molecules triggered by plant stress. Most review articles about nanosensors are focused on the working mechanisms, fabrication processes, and device architectures. This review aims at highlighting how nanotechnology can introduce additional value to sensing applications for precision farming, together with the adoption of nanosensors in the current agricultural sector. Further efforts in understanding the applications of nanosensors in a safe and sustainable agricultural environment is also addressed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Mahtta · npj Urban Sustain. · 2022 · 2 · 510.1038/s42949-022-00048-y ↗
2. U.S. WA · 2016
3. U.S. WA · 2017
4. Umapathi · Food Front. · 2002 · 3 · 66610.1002/fft2.166 ↗
5. Umapathi · Trends Food Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 119 · 6910.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.018 ↗
6. Umapathi · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2022 · 47010.1016/j.ccr.2022.214708 ↗
7. Raju · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2023 · 47610.1016/j.ccr.2022.214920 ↗
8. Lakhiar · J. Sens. · 2018 · 201810.1155/2018/8672769 ↗
9. Yang · Sens. Actuators B: Chem. · 2022 · 36110.1016/j.snb.2022.131675 ↗
10. Rai · J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. · 2012 · 3 · 31510.4236/jbnb.2012.322039 ↗
11. Srivastava · Environ. Chem. Lett. · 2018 · 16 · 16110.1007/s10311-017-0674-7 ↗
12. Lv · Nanomater., (Basel) · 2019 · 9 · 42210.3390/nano9030422 ↗
13. Giraldo · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2019 · 14 · 54110.1038/s41565-019-0470-6 ↗
14. Rastogi · Biotech. · 2019 · 9 · 9010.1007/s13205-019-1626-7 ↗
15. Shang · Mol. · 2019 · 24 · 255810.3390/molecules24142558 ↗
16. Minamiki · Sensors · 2020 · 20 · 222810.3390/s20082228 ↗
17. Abdel-Karim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/ab67aa ↗
18. Eltzov · Eurobiotech J. · 2019 · 3 · 1910.2478/ebtj-2019-0003 ↗
19. Patel · Materials (Basel) · 2020 · 13 · 167910.3390/ma13071679 ↗
20. Vikesland · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2018 · 13 · 65110.1038/s41565-018-0209-9 ↗
21. Ang · Front. Plant Sci. · 2022 · 1310.3389/fpls.2022.884454 ↗
22. Cai · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 2398710.1021/acsami.8b07373 ↗
23. Kumar A · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · B326410.1149/2.0431909jes ↗
24. Li · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2020 · 1104 · 12510.1016/j.aca.2020.01.001 ↗
25. Zhang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 56710.1021/ja1084942 ↗
26. Parveen · Sens. Actuators B: Chem. · 2017 · 246 · 91010.1016/j.snb.2017.02.170 ↗
27. Esser · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. · 2012 · 51 · 575210.1002/anie.201201042 ↗
28. Lee · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 264710.1021/nl500513n ↗
29. Zhao · ACS Omega · 2019 · 4 · 952210.1021/acsomega.9b01035 ↗
30. Wang · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 3210.1002/adma.201908214 ↗
31. Prajapati · Nanotechnol. · 2019 · 3110.1088/1361-6528/ab44fd ↗
32. Ebrahimiasl · Sci. Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 9 · 204510.1166/sam.2017.3110 ↗
33. Song · Talanta · 2015 · 144 · 68010.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.025 ↗
34. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 166010.1039/C9TA11901A ↗
35. Liu · Sci. Adv. · 2020 · 610.1126/sciadv.aax9757 ↗
36. Meng · J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. · 2020 · 145 · 7510.21273/jashs04759-19 ↗
37. Yao · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2020 · 16610.1016/j.bios.2020.112463 ↗
38. Wu · Nano Lett. · 2020 · 20 · 243210.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05159 ↗
39. Zhang · Microchim. Acta · 2019 · 186 · 58410.1007/s00604-019-3674-4 ↗
40. Zarebanadkouki · Sci Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 1297910.1038/s41598-019-49528-9 ↗
41. Lobet · Plant Physiol. · 2014 · 164 · 161910.1104/pp.113.233486 ↗
42. Foissner · Plant J. · 2000 · 23 · 81710.1046/j.1365-313X.2000.00835.x ↗
43. Bucksch · Front. Plant Sci. · 2017 · 8 · 90010.3389/fpls.2017.00900 ↗
44. Son · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2023 · 18 · 20510.1038/s41565-022-01274-2 ↗
45. Boonyaves · Nano Lett. · 2023 · 23 · 91610.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04128 ↗
46. Li · Matter · 2021 · 4 · 255310.1016/j.matt.2021.06.009 ↗
47. Ahmed · Adv. Bot. Res. · 2023 · 105 · 31110.1016/bs.abr.2022.11.003 ↗
48. Lew · Nat. Plants · 2020 · 6 · 40410.1038/s41477-020-0632-4 ↗
49. 2023
50. 2018
51. 2005
52. Alexandra · 2017
53. 2023
54. Cognet · Science · 2007 · 316 · 146510.1126/science.1141316 ↗
55. Boghossian · J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 13510.1063/1.3606496 ↗
56. Pumera · 2014
57. Phosphate sensor opens up new possibilities for growers